Talk:Surrender of Japan
Surrender of Japan is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 15, 2020. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-5 vital article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Were the atom bombs the main reason for surrender? edit
According to these Stanford and MIT professors[1] [2], later released docs show that it was known that it was well-known that the main condition the Japanese wanted was that no harm would come to the emperor and that Truman finally signaled he would abide by this only after the two bombs were dropped.
Jewel Voice Broadcast ➡ Hirohito surrender broadcast edit
Please change "Jewel Voice Broadcast" to Hirohito surrender broadcast, per the revent move of that page (because Jewel Voice Broadcast is, it turns out, a 2006 Wikipedia user-spawned neologism).
Semi-protected edit request on 27 June 2023 edit
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Simple spelling mistake/typo. "the Emperor's will that Japan surrender."
Change "Afterward, Tōgō told Suzuki that there was no hope of getting better terms, and Kido conveyed the Emperor's will that Japan surrender.".
To
"Afterward, Tōgō told Suzuki that there was no hope of getting better terms, and Kido conveyed the Emperor's will that Japan surrenders."
Or rewrite this part entirely. 109.235.37.171 (talk) 13:58, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- Not done. The existing grammar is fine. Binksternet (talk) 16:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- Not entirely. 'afterward' (as opposed to 'afterwards') suggests the use of English American grammar and the use of the plural form for 'Japan surrender' suggests the use of British American grammar. In any case, I can agree it's probably fine as is; at most a minor confusion on the use of grammar
- . Thank you for looking at it. 89.205.135.89 (talk) 15:23, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
FAR needed edit
A 2009 FA with notable issues:
- Countless sentences and paragraphs without refs.
- The article overuses quotes and blockquotes, of which many are lengthy.
- Some large paragraphs only supported by one citation at the end.
- Many webpages referenced when they're better covered by high-quality academic books and journals.
- More than a third (73/185) of all citations rely only on Frank 1999 and Hasegawa 2005 as of now.
- Thousands of new, quality texts on this vital topic exist in TWL. Some are definitely due for inclusion.
- Citations and explanatory notes are mixed, but the problem is that different refstyles are used for each note.
Pinging FAC nominators Wwoods and Raul654. Wretchskull (talk) 10:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Wretchskull: Do you still have these concerns with the article? If so, do you want to take this to FAR? Z1720 (talk) 02:07, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
the intro is too long edit
I hope it's not too unhelpful to give general feedback? the introduction is too long but I'm not sure how I'd summarise it. So just leaving it as a general suggestion. FourPi (talk) 06:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)