Talk:Surreal humour
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Eldomtom2 in topic The article's conflation of surreal humour and surrealism
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Surreal humour article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days  |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | Surreal humour received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The article's conflation of surreal humour and surrealism edit
This doesn't ring true to me. It feels wrong to confine such classics of surreal humour as the Alice books to being mere "precursors" of "actual" surreal humour. Eldomtom2 (talk) 22:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)