This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eminem, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eminem on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EminemWikipedia:WikiProject EminemTemplate:WikiProject EminemEminem articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Although not a single, it was still a popular track and had a music video. More importantly, it charted regardlessly. Does this qualify for a page? -Disco dude rock (talk) 22:43, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Since this was released as a legitimate single, so should it be put in chronology with the rest? -Disco dude rock (talk) 20:49, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
So, Aardwolf68, your suggestion is that I should add a source in order to reinstate information that you want in the article? That's not how it works; you have to add the source yourself (and if you reinstate the info with no changes, you will violate WP:3RR). Erpertblah, blah, blah... 18:29, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
All you have to do is link the lyrics, it’s not just something I want, it’s been apart of the article for a while Aardwolf68 (talk) 18:32, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Erpert, he's continuously adding fake unsourced information. His talk page shows that he's been doing this for a while. And he's not quitting --Mr. Crabx (talk) 10:39, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Don't listen to him, he's a sock of Morce Library and targeting me specficially. Aardwolf68 (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I struck the sock's comment. But my argument still stands. Erpertblah, blah, blah... 16:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
