Talk:Nuclear power debate
Latest comment: 4 months ago by 2A02:2788:7C8:610:FDFF:58AA:F23:2BD9 in topic Non-neutral
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nuclear power debate article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Wiki Education assignment: European Studies edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2022 and 29 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gwmonroe (article contribs).
Non-neutral edit
Some parts of this article are written as an opinion piece. See things like:
Greenpeace and some other environmental organizations have been criticized for distributing claims about CO2 emissions from nuclear power that are unsupported by the scientific data. Their influence has been attributed to "shocking" results of 2020 poll in France, where 69% of the respondents believed that nuclear power contributes to climate change.
The claim about Greenpeace is NOT supported by the [1]quoted news piece. 2A02:2788:7C8:610:FDFF:58AA:F23:2BD9 (talk) 17:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)