Talk:Mammuthus armeniacus

	Paleontology portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Same as steppe mammoth? edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

It is very difficult to find anything authoritative and recent regarding M. armeniacus, which I think is because it is no longer recognized as a separate species. Instead, I find a few papers/etc that claim that M. trogontherii is the same as M. armeniacus. For example, the Academy of Natural Sciences website has an article that says "This widely distributed species is the direct ancestor of ... the steppe mammoth (Mammuthus trogontherii or M. armeniacus) of western Eurasia." There are several other publications that also make similar claims, they are easy to find but I will be happy to provide more citations if anyone wants me to. I tried to redirect this page to steppe mammoth but that was reverted, so it appears there remains some doubt about this issue. ErikHaugen (talk) 00:14, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

At first, I had thought that this paper by Lenardic [1] said that M. armeniacus and M. trogonotherii were two distinct species, but after re-rereading that paper, I think he was trying to demote "Elephas trogonotherii" as a junior synonym of M. armeniacus (as being a highly variable intermediate form between M. meridionalis and M. primigenius. And after reading this new paper [2] by Todd 2009, it appears that the consensus is that M. armeniacus is a junior synonym of M. trogonotherii. Forgive me for the bother, then.--Mr Fink (talk) 03:45, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for finding those! ErikHaugen (talk) 08:33, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Doesn't [Todd] say that M. trogontherii is the junior synonym? Should it be the other way 'round? ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 23:22, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Apparently, yes, he does, after all. It seems that more and more people are slowly using M. armenicus as the Steppe Mammoth.--Mr Fink (talk) 01:16, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Jan 2012 I am working together with paleontologist Dick Mol He tells me that the paleontologic world definitely goes with M. trogontherii, not armeniacus, which has been decided in Shoshoni, J., & Tassy, P., (eds.), 1996: The Proboscidea - Evolution and paleontology of elephants and their relatives. Andre —Preceding undated comment added 21:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC).Reply

Add topic