Talk:Fearless Tour/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 09:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 18:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I will complete a review within one week. One quick thing I see on the talk page is that [[Discovery Family#As The Hub / Hub Network|The Hub]] is a broken anchor. -Riley1012 (talk) 18:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for reviewing. I've fixed the pipe :) Ippantekina (talk) 04:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

• Rehearsals took place in an old steel factory Nashville, Tennessee, starting from February 2009 and lasting for over a month. Add "in" before "Nashville" and change "from" to "in".
• ...six background dancers were dressed as cheerleaders and the seven-member backing band wore marching band outfits. Add a comma after "cheerleaders"

2. Verifiable
Copyvio check is fine- the similarities highlighted in the five sources above 20% are because of song titles from the setlist and direct quotes.

• Is thehothits.com (ref. 12) a reliable source?
• References that are dead URLs without an archive link: 59
• Spot check

  20: A fairytale-inspired castle, co-designed by Swift, featured more than one million lumens of light. The source doesn't mention the lumens fact.

  No issues: 3, 6, 8, 13, 16, 21, 25, 31, 39, 43, 45, 48, 51, 54, 62, 70, 77, 88

3. Broad
The article covers the subject fully and stays focused.

4. Neutral
The article is neutral.

5. Stable
This article is stable day-to-day, no edit warring or content disputes.

6. Illustrated
The images have relevant captions and do not have copyright issues.

@Ippantekina: Not a lot to fix here- I will be happy to promote once these few changes are made. -Riley1012 (talk) 00:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Riley1012:, thanks for the review again. I've addressed all points accordingly! :) Ippantekina (talk) 04:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Okay, looks good. I will pass this! -Riley1012 (talk) 13:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.