Talk:Book of Malachi

Latest comment: 4 months ago by IncandescentBliss in topic Article needs a lot of help

Content Error edit

The references in the article to Malachi and Zechariah read אלֹהִים [Elohim] but the MSS read יהוה [YHVH].50.4.5.123 (talk) 16:11, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Subjective Bias Within This Article edit

There is blatant subjective bias in several sections of this article. For example, the NRSV New Testament comparisons are based on a Protestant perspective. I don't think this article should be used to expound Protestant theology. Please keep this in mind when modifying articles such as this one. --Gorgalore —Preceding comment was added at 13:48, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah it just looks like poop 66.31.65.132 (talk) 06:26, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

This article needs some citations/references. Everything below the "Period" section looks like original research. Misterniceguy (talk) 15:09, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reversion edit

I couldn't help but notice that my revised and expanded entry for the book of Malachi was reverted. The version I attempted to use cited the old version as a reference (the 100+ year old Easton's Bible Dictionary) and added a great deal more information.

Was there something specifically wrong with my update which necessitated its entire removal? --Jdstrgh 08:19, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I argree!
I thought the new article was good and was a needed update of a 100 year old BIble Dictionary --John Campbell 12:48, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Good. I have changed it back. JFW | T@lk 14:07, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. I realize that people change this quite often...and not always for the better. It'd good to see people are keeping their eyes on it! --John Campbell 16:15, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Book of Malachi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

The parallels edit

Some of the parallels don’t appear direct, some of them are only comparable in their wordplay. Bagabondo (talk) 08:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Article needs a lot of help edit

Just a note that this article needs a lot of help. It has no modern scholarship on the book. IncandescentBliss (talk) 00:39, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply