Talk:Argumentum ad populum
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Hob Gadling in topic Fallacy
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Argumentum ad populum article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Fallacy edit
Is it really possible to say that Argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy while most of the values we accept as a society are indeed "Argumentum ad populum"? --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 12:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yes. A majority of people believing something is good or true doesn't make it ethical or correct. Germanater09 (talk) 00:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- See here. --Hob Gadling (talk) 05:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
ad UNpopularity? edit
Is there a name for the opposite? ie "No one agrees with X." StephanNaro (talk) 07:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)