Talk:Alexander Rud Mills

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
edit

I have re-added a link to the Alexander Rud Mills project and despite being hosted by Geocities it is the best external source available and also it cites its sources. WP:EL lists types of site which should normally be avoided but I think in this case the content of the page linked to justifies inclusion.--Hengest 20:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

You could always ask for permission to mirror it on a non-Geocities page... I think the main contention are the pop-ups and adverts on Geocities - that and it's pretty much a byword for amateur. I concur, that the content is a valuable resource. - WeniWidiWiki 20:32, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I am the copyright holder for the 'individual geocities site' that hosts the Alexander Rudd Mills Project. I am prepared to add detail to the wikipedia page if allowed access. Wodensson 03:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wodensson, you already have access so you can edit whenever you are ready. If you need any help with formatting or citing sources etc. then please ask and somebody here will be happy to help.--Hengest 19:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alexander Rud Mills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:01, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply