Talk:Stagger (aeronautics)

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Numerical stagger edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The aircraft I chose as an example, the Gloster TSR.38 is fairly obscure, but stagger (and gaps) are not all that often quoted unless there are detailed reports eg manufacturers or Martlesham for UK aircraft. It would be good to have citable sources for a better known machine.TSRL (talk) 17:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic