Talk:Phonetic change "f → h" in Spanish

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created, improved, or expanded by a translator from the Open Knowledge Association (OKA).

Needs improvement for sure, but where to start? edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article definitely needs repair, but the question is where to start. The title itself is misleading, i.e. from Latin /f/ to modern null, the change is not just phonetic; it's phonemic/structural/underlying, depending on the approach taken. Unsourced peremptory declarations such as "The realization of the phoneme /f/ as a bilabial fricative [ɸ], is quite unstable" require at the very least some explication. Distinctions between allophony (/f/ → [h]) and restructuring (/f/ > /h/) are inconsistently observed. Terms (e.g. aspirate, aspiration/fricative) are used inconsistently. And much more. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 19:08, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic