Fastily

Subject: Contesting Speedy Deletion of User Page

Hello Fastily,

Deletion Review Request

Description of the Deleted Content:

The deleted content was an article titled "The Stealing of Emily - Closed Material Procedures Secret Courts" that I authored. It provided information about a book I wrote, including its title, genre, and a brief summary of its plot.

Reasons for Reinstatement:

I believe the deleted content should be reinstated for the following reasons:

• The article adhered to Wikipedia's content policies and guidelines, including those on notability and verifiability.
• The book "The Stealing of Emily - Closed Material Procedures Secret Courts" is a notable work in its genre, as evidenced by its positive reception and reviews on reputable platforms such as Goodreads.
• The deletion may have been based on a misunderstanding or misinterpretation of Wikipedia's guidelines.

Supporting Evidence or References:

• The deleted content was sourced from Goodreads, a reputable platform for book reviews and information. [Link to Goodreads page: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/195237122-the-stealing-of-emily---closed-material-procedures-secret-courts]
• The book is also available on the author's official website, further confirming its availability and relevance. [Link to author's website: https://thestealingofemily.co.uk/bookshelf/]
• The book has an official Facebook page maintained by the author, which provides updates and information about the book. [Link to Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/TheStealingofEmily/]
• The book's ISBN information is available through the ISBN Agency, providing additional verification of its existence and publication details. [Link to ISBN Agency page: https://www.isbnagency.com/titles/9781513697574-the-stealing-of-emily--fate-of-children-through-our-court-system]

Clarity and Conciseness:

The original article provided a clear and concise overview of the book, including its title, author, genre, and plot summary. It adhered to Wikipedia's guidelines for article structure and content presentation.

Respectful Tone:

I respectfully request that the deleted content be reinstated in accordance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe that restoring the article would contribute positively to the Wikipedia community by providing valuable information about a notable literary work.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely, [Your Martinnewbold]

Hello Fastily,

I find it extremely perplexing and disheartening that my user page, User Secular Naturalism, has been tagged for speedy deletion under the claim that it is promotional. The page was created in compliance with Wikipedia's guidelines, focusing on personal information, interests relevant to Wikipedia's mission, and my contributions to the platform. Here is the content of the page in question:

[SEO spam removed]

The page includes typical user page content: a brief biography, a summary of my philosophical interests, a list of my contributions, and a sandbox link. It does not serve as an advertisement but rather as a personal introduction and an organizational tool for my activities on Wikipedia.

I strongly urge a reconsideration of the deletion tag, as the content aligns with Wikipedia's guidelines for user pages. If there are specific issues, I am more than willing to make necessary adjustments. However, tagging this page for deletion without a proper review seems unwarranted and undermines the efforts of active contributors.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best regards, Secular Naturalism Secular Naturalism (talk) 04:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Secular Naturalism. You may not use Wikipedia to promote your business/services or the business/services of a client. Please be advised that repeated violations of this rule will result in loss of editing privileges. Thanks, Fastily 09:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Rollback removal

Hi Fastily! I haven't had much time for working in anti-vandalism lately; would you be able to remove rollback from my account? Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 18:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi HouseBlaster. Sure,  Done -Fastily 08:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Database reports/Transclusions of non-existent templates

I haven't caught up on the noticeboards, so sorry if you already know about this, but Wikipedia:Database reports/Transclusions of non-existent templates broke a couple of days ago and hasn't recovered. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi Jonesey95. I was not aware of this, thanks for the ping. I restarted the webservice and manually kicked off an update. Regards, Fastily 03:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC)