Rationale for deletion?

edit

My apologies, I was rearranging and adding a lot of text and didn't give the reasons for these deletions.

1. Photo-Club of Paris. There's no link, and I can't find any information about what it did and why it's important. I'll keep looking. 2. EuroDisney is not in Paris, and not within the scope of this article. If we include everything in the Paris region, we need to include events at Versailles and many other places. 3. Parc de la VIlette was actually built between 1987-1991, and is part of the City of Science and Industry, which opened in 1986, and which I listed in the timeline.

Thank you for the explanation. How would you describe "the scope of this article"? It may be useful to add a guiding intro paragraph useful to both readers and editors. In my opinion, for instance, major events near Paris (like opening of EuroDisney) affect people in Paris, and are therefore worthy of inclusion in the city timeline. M2545 (talk) 16:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Good question. I think the main goal here is to try to make the article useful, interesting and not too long or filled with trivia. I think it should include no more than the two or three most important events (political, social, cultural, or economic) events in any given year. These could be the opening of an important new museum or landmark, the Olympic games, a landmark cultural event (Premiere of Rites of Spring, and Gershwin writing an 'American in Paris' ) a major civil disturbance or natural disaster. Again, the key is limiting the number of events to two or three maximum per year, otherwise it will get filled with trivia and promotions and will be hard to read. The best timeline example I've seen so far is the Rome history timeline, which covers a comparable number of centuries and which is concise, informative, and well-illustrated. Having good images with clear, dated captions is also essential, for people who are looking for the dates of important landmarks and events.

Also, I don't think the population figures should be sprinkled throughout the timeline; I think we should have an info box where you can see the population growth (with citations) in one place, without having to search the article for it.

I welcome anyone else's thoughts an ideas on this.SiefkinDR (talk) 19:13, 11 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Population Statistics

edit

The population statistics in the timeline are questionable, and often very different from the population statistics which are found in the article Demographics of Paris and also in Histoire de Paris by Yves Combeau (1999). I propose we replace them with the official figures, and put them in a separate section or a couple of sections, by century. Any thoughts about this? SiefkinDR (talk) 13:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes, good idea to include official population statistics. I think population info should be integrated into each relevant year in the timeline, rather than ghettoed aside. M2545 (talk) 14:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Year of establishment in Paris?

edit

Photo-club de Paris

edit

Photo-club de Paris founded in 1888 should absolutely be kept. It is one of the most important events in the history of "art", if photography is considered to be an art - which it is. Think of Niépce & Daguerre.

Mention of it can be found at the Bibliothèque nationale de France:

http://data.bnf.fr/13171255/photo-club_de_paris/
http://data.bnf.fr/atelier/13171255/photo-club_de_paris/
http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b8458363g

and in this interesting article:

http://www.photo-arago.fr/Explorer/Th%C3%A8mes/Photo-Club-de-Paris

In an article on Paris, mention of what touches the beginning of photography & its development as an art is as important as the touristic bateaux-mouches on the Seine & certainly more important than... Disneyland Paris, which is not in Paris!

--Blue Indigo (talk) 08:26, 17 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Image of the Burning of the Amaurians

edit

Dear Blue Indigo- thanks for this image, it's great. Any further suggestions on images for the Timeline are very welcome. SiefkinDR (talk)

0.o - Maps?

edit

I haven't looked at this in ages, and what an improvement! Bravo to all who worked here. I'm working on some maps (Paris' successive walls over the ages) that may be of some use here, if you're interested. THEPROMENADER   08:20, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for Recent Corrections

edit

Dear Blue Indigo, thanks for your recent corrections and improvements. I made just one change; the number of Communards buried in the cemeteries includes both those killed in the fighting and those executed afterwards. There's an explanation of the source of these numbers in the article Paris Commune. Best wishes for the New Year- SiefkinDR (talk) 19:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for catching this: I should have known better... In fact, I knew, but was too quick at deleting "killed". Sorry I have not had time lately to spend on this.
Best wishes for the New Year to you also! --Blue Indigo (talk) 08:02, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Page layout

edit

The current layout of this article looks great and is quite functional. For comparison's sake, however, the design of Timeline of the San Francisco Bay Area differs slightly. It especially streamlines the layout of years with multiple events (centered headings, fewer bullet points, even more images, etc.). Thoughts? Any interest in considering a slight restyling of the Paris timeline layout? (Following the San Francisco model, the layout of the Timeline of Boston was recently revised. See changes here). -- M2545 (talk) 07:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bibliography of Paris

edit
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Timeline of Paris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:40, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference anthony1902 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference MMA-euf11 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).