This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
The busts are great, but they don't really give that good of an idea of what the helmet looked like. A modern reproduction would be a great addition.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 07:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Even better would be a photo of the Ashmolean's original helmet. However, there is nothing on Wikimedia Commons, sadly. Urselius (talk) 13:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
I live in New York, the Met might have something. I'll take a picture if I see one. If you're cheap enough and don't possess the feeling of shame they will let you in for a penny.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 01:36, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Y I've just added a photo of the helmet at the Ashmolean Museum, although it was hard to get a good photo because of glass glare. BabelStone (talk) 19:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply