Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-07-05/Technology report
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Seav in topic Discuss this story
Discuss this story
- As the lead developer of Peachy, I disagree with the idea that bot operators are required to use it. I believe that everyone should have an option as to what framework to use. Peachy may be the best in some people's eyes, and in other eyes, it may be far too bloated for the purposes and they may want a small, barebones class. (X! · talk) · @976 · 22:25, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
- "[T]he namesake of this report"? This is "Technology report", not "Brion Vibber report"... OrangeDog (τ • ε) 12:01, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- See the initials of "Bugs, repairs, and internal operational news". --seav (talk) 16:15, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
←Was it indeed renamed "Arbitration report"? If so, thank the gods for it. The irony was lost on many readers ... :-) Tony (talk) 16:52, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- How did I never notice any of these for five years? OrangeDog (τ • ε) 12:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- It's actually pretty subtle. I didn't realize it myself a few years ago until it was pointed out. Check out the comments on the BRION report the week Brion resigned for an assurance that this report will remain at this title: Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-09-28/Technology report :-) --seav (talk) 15:17, 15 July 2010 (UTC)