Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikipedia essays/Archives/2016/December
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I invite you to an ongoing RfD discussion about those redirect to WP:AADD#Just a vote. --George Ho (talk) 19:55, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Your archives list needs updating...
...because right now it looks like nothing has happened until this month from 2013 June. :) Thanks! — Geekdiva (talk) 22:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
I created this essay in belated response to Wikipedia:Competence is required. I invite you to make improvements on the essay. --George Ho (talk) 22:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
The essay is userfied. I don't know how to mainstream the "Competence is not required" message. How do I give advices about this message? --George Ho (talk) 03:37, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Now I need help on expanding User:George Ho/Competence is not required to make it acceptable for the "Wikipedia:" namespace. --George Ho (talk) 06:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- George Ho, Users who repeatedly make the same errors after being prompted are generally walked through the 4 levels of message and then blocked for being disruptive. Your message that they shall not be forced to improve and that a person shall not be blocked or banned for incompetence runs counter to that long held practice. Cabayi (talk) 23:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- Is there a policy or guideline discussing incompetence in general? George Ho (talk) 05:47, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- Rewrote the passage, Cabayi. George Ho (talk) 05:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- What if I retitle the essay to "Competence is not policy" or "Competence is not a guideline" or "Competence is not a rule"? George Ho (talk) 06:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)