Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Websites/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
4chan
Whoever decided that 4chan is not at least as important as TheForce.Net and Woot really needs to get their head screwed on straight. 4chan has tens of thousands of posts each day and is a center of internet culture. Please rethink your decision and rate 4chan as at least mid, preferably high, on the importance scale. --72.66.75.159 (talk) 20:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
This AfD discussion could use some fresh eyes. Comments are appreciated. Thank you, Cirt (talk) 23:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
The Million Dollar Homepage has been nominated at FAC (Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Million Dollar Homepage). Any neutral reviews from Wikiproject members would be appreciated. Thank you! Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 17:17, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Naming convention?
I was surprised that there's no naming convention listed for website articles at WP:NAME. While working on NPP, I came across Fire Joe Morgan. Should this be moved to Firejoemorgan.com? Or should I create Firejoemorgan.com as a redirect to Fire Joe Morgan? And to make things more confusing, the most frequent name for the site that I've seen around the intertoobs is FJM.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Coordinators' working group
Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.
If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.
Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.
Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:51, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
We're planning to get Wikipedia:WikiProject Blogging going again. Please come and help us out! Computerjoe's talk 10:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
PureVolume afd
PureVolume is up for deletion, please comment on it: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PureVolume. ~EdGl ★ 19:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Consensus Needed on Ning
There has been some dispute over the Controversies section of the Ning article. This dispute can be found in the talk page.
Please review this dispute and help resolve it by weighing in whether Charting Stocks is a reliable source here. [1] While there are multiple issues beyond WP:RS, this seems to be the biggest point of contention at the moment. Thanks. Kangaru99 (talk) 20:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Peer Review
I've requested a peer review of Wikipedia to see if a FA bid would be advisable. If anyone has time to do the review, it would be much appreciated. --Cybercobra (talk) 20:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Sys-Con
The reliability of Sys-Con as a source is being discussed at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Sys-Con. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Relevant AfD
Relevant AfD, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rumor website parody of Glenn Beck. Cirt (talk) 03:42, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
I couldn't believe that there wasn't an article on this topic, so I started a stub. --seav (talk) 01:32, 17 October 2009 (UTC)