Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Illustration has been archived to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce/Archive 1.

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Pages moved. Ucucha 23:25, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

---

Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Taskforce → Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce —, and suggested moves of several related pages. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:57, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Discussion copied from User talk:Anthony Appleyard

• Hi, thanks for taking a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Taskforce. I'm not sure what to do with that and some related pages. I was looking at the histmerge largely because of there being a talk page on Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration with useful information, which is the main issue I had with doing a simple redirect. Also the "Taskforce" name isn't descriptive. Would
  1. Moving Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Taskforce to Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce
  2. Moving Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Illustration to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce/Archive 1
  3. Redirecting Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration (and its talk) to Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce
  4. Starting the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration task force with a {{copied}} template for the WP:Illustration copy.
  5. Merging/redirecting Wikipedia:WikiProject SVG (after a discussion on related pages or via MFD) to the Illustration task force.

  sound like an ok solution to you? I know there's several discussions need to take place, but I recently updated Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Wikipedia#Files and its a mish mash of overlapping projects there. -Optigan13 (talk) 23:46, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

• I could not perform the history-merge requested because the first 33 edits of Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration are WP:Parallel versions; the move from Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Taskforce to Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration was not a plain cut-and-paste move but a textmerge. See WP:Parallel versions. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Continued discussion

• Comment the current name is quite weird... an anonymously named taskforce... 70.29.210.242 (talk) 13:31, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Shapley-Folkman lemma

The featured-article candidate Shapley-Folkman lemma would benefit from a review of its illustrations. The article has 3 supports and no opposes; the supports did not discuss the illustrations. A FA-specialist editor asked for a review of the illustrations.

There are two new images for the page, as well as an animation.

Thank you!  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

All I can say about its illustrations is that "I am impressed". Excellent. Fleet Command (talk) 13:06, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, FleetCommand!

I should note that User:Quaddell kindly reviewed the images, as part of the FA nomination.

Most of the images come from other articles, but the two best were custom-contributed by User:David Eppstein, whose image galleries awaken the "inner mathematician/artist" in each of us. :D

Best regards,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Ouch! These pictures' placement really disfigure this section of talk page, at least on my screen. So, I moved them to the bottom. But in the process I noticed a problem: The alt text is very long. Remember: Alt text is a mean of accessibility. It is for those who cannot see the image and must hear it. So, alt text should not be similar to caption; otherwise, the visually-impaired people will just hear the same text twice. It is a torture for those poor folks. Make sure alt text is something like "illustration" or a short summary. Read help documentations for more info. Fleet Command (talk) 11:12, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

• 
  The Shapley–Folkman lemma is illustrated by the Minkowski addition of four sets. The point (+) in the convex hull of the Minkowski sum of the four non-convex sets (right) is the sum of four points (+) from the (left-hand) sets—two points in two non-convex sets plus two points in the convex hulls of two sets. The convex hulls are shaded pink. The original sets each have exactly two points (shown as red dots).
• 
  The circumradius (blue) and inner radius (green) of a point set (dark red, with its convex hull shown as the lighter red dashed lines). The inner radius is smaller than the circumradius except for subsets of a single circle, for which they are equal.

Pencil Manufacture

For Pencil#Manufacture, please make animation of pencil manufacture using http://i.imgur.com/788bA.gif as example. Thanks! -- Utmoatr (talk) 11:38, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Trolley problem

The article Trolley problem could use some pictures to illustrate the different variations of the problem, if anyone is interested in creating them. —Granger (talk · contribs) 19:49, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Annotated image policy

If anyone has an interest in interactive annotated images, I've made a post on WP:IUP to discuss when wikilinked image annotation is appropriate. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)^talk 02:42, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Image optimization challenge

Think you are good at image editing? I have a challenge for you. See File talk:500 x 500 SMPTE Color Bars.png#Challenge. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2016 (UTC)