Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Contract bridge

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Aymatth2 in topic Project-independent quality assessments
WikiProject iconContract bridge Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Contract bridge, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Contract bridge on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Some Talk posted here is relocated to Talk about appropriate project subpages.


Skip to: Bottom of page to add a new topic or see most recent new topics

Categorising UK bridge players by nationality edit

The discussion has been relocated to the talk page of 'Category:British contract bridge players'.

Copyright Advice needed. Edwin C Howell edit

The discussion has been relocated to the talk page of the subject article.

Project-independent quality assessments edit

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:48, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kristen Onsgard edit

I've created about 300 Wikipedia articles on Bridge players.

Occasionally an article on a player, usually a female players, gets rejected by another Wikipedia editor.

I created a page for Kristen Onsgard, who recently won a North American Bridge Championship. It was moved to Draft space by Geschichte . I asked for a review by more senior editors, they moved the page back to the main branch. Geschichte then put a "no significant coverage" banner. I removed this after more people had edited the page. Geschichte retaliated by submitting the page for Kristen Onsgard to Articles for Deletion.

Please comment on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kristen_Onsgard with your opinions.

Formal definition for approval in Wikipedia edit

Wikipedia does not have a formal definition for Bridge and what is notable.

Please see my suggestion for this definition at

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(sports)#Bridge_2