Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Awards/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Category for discussion

RockMagnetist (talk) 16:53, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

VAC Benny Award.jpg.png

image:VAC Benny Award.jpg.png has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 21:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Tony Award hooks at DYK

Please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Proposal for a day of 67th Tony Awards nominee DYK hooks.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:42, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Ausublues.jpg

File:Ausublues.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 23:49, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Nazi medals images up for deletion

• File:LongServe25orwm.jpg
• File:LongServe25owm.jpg
• File:LongServe25rwm.jpg
• File:LongServe40or.jpg
• File:LongServe40owm.jpg
• File:LongServe40rwm.jpg
• File:LongServe50bwm.jpg

have been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 05:54, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

File:AHS Sikorsky Prize Winning Flight by AeroVelo.jpg

File:AHS Sikorsky Prize Winning Flight by AeroVelo.jpg has been nominated for deletion on Commons -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 10:22, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Mahatma Gandhi Seva medal.jpg

image:Mahatma Gandhi Seva medal.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Орден святого Михаила Архангела1988г.jpg

image:Орден святого Михаила Архангела1988г.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 09:09, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:GLAAD Media Award winners

Category:GLAAD Media Award winners has been nominated for deletion -- 70.24.244.158 (talk) 06:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Categories

There are several categories up for deletion that you may be interested in, see

• Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 September 8
• Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 September 10
• Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 September 11
• Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 September 12
• Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 September 13

-- 70.24.244.158 (talk) 06:38, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

British Empire Games 1950 Silver Medal.jpg

image:British Empire Games 1950 Silver Medal.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 65.92.181.39 (talk) 07:14, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Meteorite prizes

Over at WikiProject Geology/Meteorites we're having a month long focus to eliminate red links either by starting new articles or by finding appropriate link targets within existing articles. We'd be very glad of WikiProject Awards and prizes' help with any of the following:

• Fellow medal
• Leconte medal
  • Leconte Medal
• International Jury of Awards

-Arb. (talk) 21:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Academy Award non free image and placeholder discussion

An editor had placed a non free image on the article Academy Award believing that the Commons policy on source country freedom of Panorama applies to Wikipedia because commons recently decided by consensus to allow the uploads until a law suit somewhere creates case law. Wikipedia has a strict non free image policy about the use of copyrighted 3 dimensional works. Since the image is not allowed on Wikipedia without a fair use rationale and a placeholder image has been put into the infobox, a consensus discussion has begun to determine if the place holder should remain at Talk:Academy Award#Image place holder? please join the discussion and add you input.--Amadscientist (talk) 18:26, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Peter Mark Memorial Award

Hey everyone,

I stumbled across the article for the Peter Mark Memorial award while clicking "Random Article" and noticed it had a bunch of gaping holes in the table, so I've remedied that to some degree.

The issue: The "Citation" field in the table...it appears that so far, the entries are just copy/pasted from the AVS web site (the source, which, I've updated, as the older one was defunct).

Is that a copyvio issue...and should the Citation field of the table be outright deleted? Wanted to check with those who will know better than I. Thanks! GRUcrule (talk) 20:44, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

São Paulo Prize for Literature

It looks like I'm the only one who has really worked on the São Paulo Prize for Literature for awhile. I was able to dig up a substantial amount of information for each year the prize has been given, like who served on the jury, and how many books were judged. It's all in the main article right now, but I've noticed a lot of other prizes actually create separate articles for each year it is given. See for example the Man Booker Prize prize page, which is supplemented by the 2012 Man Booker Prize page and the 2013 Man Booker Prize page. I feel like the São Paulo Prize for Literature page looks cluttered with all the information, but if I break out each year into it's own page, then I feel like each of the individual articles may be too small to be worth it. Any suggestions? Vojen (talk) 22:44, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

About Grammy Award naming scheme

Hi. I have recently come across a conundrum over the names of our Grammy Award articles. The year we are using for our Grammy articles is "off by one" from the year that the Grammy organization is using. For instance, the article 1977 Grammy Awards corresponds to the "1976, 19th Annual Grammy Awards" on their website. The only discussion I've found about the naming of Grammy articles is this archived one. I'm not disputing that the award ceremony happened in 1977; in that sense they are the 1977 Grammy Awards. But since the awards are given, I guess, for records released in 1976, in that sense they are the 1976 Grammy Awards; it is this interpretation that the Grammy organization seems to be using for some, if not all, years. Thoughts on this? Previous discussions I've yet to find? Jason Quinn (talk) 16:37, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

The Recording Academy usually names the ceremonies using ordinal numbers (eg here, and here they use both year and ordinal number. I'd be happy to see the articles renamed in such a fashion. Adabow (talk) 06:51, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

I found this discussion about the naming scheme. Jason Quinn (talk) 04:32, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

I noticed that the Academy Award pages like 83rd Academy Awards use you naming scheme you suggest Adabow. I suppose a change could be in order. I'm surprised so few people have commented on this issue. I would have thought that the Grammies are a popular subject for editors. Hmph. Jason Quinn (talk) 20:12, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

it seems that there was consensus for moving back to ordinal numbers, but no one requested admin help. Adabow (talk) 20:22, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

I don't know about consensus but the current naming system is a big, confusing mistake. Perhaps that's why basically all the major award articles use the ordinal number naming scheme instead. For instance:

• 76th Academy Awards
• 19th Primetime Emmy Awards
• 61st Golden Globe Awards
• 25th Golden Raspberry Awards
• 58th Tony Awards
• 31st People's Choice Awards
• 31st Saturn Awards

I fear from the silence here that nobody is really interested in maintaining the Grammy Awards anyway. Given the huge issue with ambiguity in the year, the Grammy organization itself preferring the ordinal scheme, and the precedent of the other major awards, I think it's okay if we go ahead and declare that the pages should be changed back to the ordinal naming scheme. Ugh... What a mess. Now it's just a matter of doing it. Jason Quinn (talk) 20:28, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

I think I have found a good solution to this problem. The word "Annual" appears to be an official part of the award ceremony name. For instance the article for the ceremony that happened in 1970 should be called 12th Annual Grammy Awards (which does not currently exist) while 12th Grammy Awards does exist as a redirect. Except for a handful of years, pages have not been created that use "annual" as part of the name. So by moving the existing articles over to new pages that use "annual" with improve the naming scheme at the same time as using a better name. This is my plan. I will wait a few days for more comments and then begin to implement it. Jason Quinn (talk) 20:37, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

I have moved the first five Grammy Award ceremonies as above. I will pause for a while, perhaps two or three days, to see if it attracts any more interest in this discussion. I don't know how the off-by-one error will be solved (that is, what the Grammy organization calls the 1959 Grammy Awards is what we are calling the 1960 Grammy Awards and so on). I shudder to think how many links are involved with that problem. Any article that has a link like 1975 Grammy Awards really should be 1974 Grammy Awards. Can't just change the redirect or it will screw up the content of those articles. Jason Quinn (talk) 01:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

UPDATE: I have now changed the first 20 Grammy Award pages over to the new scheme. Over the next week or so I'll finish the rest. Jason Quinn (talk) 03:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

UPDATE 2: I have finished the renaming of all the articles. I corrected a few issues with redirects and unreverted talk page blanking along the way, including finding yet another comment by a user confused by the year-based scheme. Unfortunately, there are many thousands of articles that link to the Grammy by year titles. it looks like we are stuck with the "off by one year" naming scheme compared to the Grammy organization itself for the indeterminate future. I'm thinking that I should move protect all these articles so that any future renaming is properly debated. One thing I'm wondering is if the Grammy organization dropped the word "Annual" from the official name of the ceremonies at some point, which may require another minor renaming for a subset of the later articles. Jason Quinn (talk) 22:39, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!

I've recently created the page List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!.

Additional help with research, secondary source suggestions, and quality improvement ideas would be appreciated, at Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!.

Thank you for your time,

— Cirt (talk) 17:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

List peer review for List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!

• Wikipedia:Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!/archive1

I've started a list peer review for List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!, feedback to further along the quality improvement process would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!/archive1. — Cirt (talk) 19:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Featured List nomination for List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!

1. List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!
2. Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!/archive1

I've started a Featured List nomination for List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!.

Participation would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!/archive1.

Thank you for your time,

— Cirt (talk) 15:26, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Singular and plural Award(s)

Current discussion of moving the Academy Award article (Suggested move) alerts me to the WP:SINGULAR admonition to use the singular in article titles. Consider Nobel Prize and National Book Award which are about annual sets of awards.

Perhaps these articles on British literary awards should have singular names

• Costa Book Awards (previously Whitbread)
• Specsavers National Book Awards (previously Galaxy); Category:British Book Awards
• Hampshire Book Awards

and there are many more Pages in Category:American literary awards. --P64 (talk) 20:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

I don't know if the specific preferred usage of any one of those awards would weigh against a singular form, but I have no objections to changing all of the plural article titles to singular. --Vojen (talk) 08:00, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Which of those awards make a person notable?

See Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)#The_person_has_received_a_well-known_and_significant_award_or_honor.2C_or_has_been_nominated_for_one_several_times.. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:53, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

That's a good question. The importance of an award will sometimes vary over time as will the importance of its recipients, and oftentimes an award only becomes notable because it successfully identifies notable individuals before their notability is generally recognized. Notability is probably going to come down to a case by case basis for most people, but if you're looking for a general rule, you can check the Awards and Prizes WikiProject ranking for importance. Unfortunately this project is not as active as some of the other projects, so a lot of awards are laking importance ranks, and many that are ranked haven't been fully veted. However, as a general guideline I'd say winning or even being listed as a finalist for an award that has been ranked for Top Importance would probably make an individual notable per se. Winners of an award ranked for High Importance would also be per se notable, but I don't know that I would extend that distinction to award finalists. Of course many of the other finalists would be notable anyway, but if we're talking about a per se rule, this is where I would draw the line. Many of the Mid Importance rank awards are really just individual iterations of higher ranked awards (e.g. the article for the 26th Annual Grammy Awards is given a mid-importance rank, but the article for the Grammy Award itself is given a high-importance rank), so many of the winners of these awards will still be notable as winners of higher ranked awards. This is also true of many of the sports awards, like the Cy Young Award or the Heisman Trophy, both of which are mid-importance for awards purposes, but are high-importance in their respective fields. However, other awards look less significant, such as the J. Tuzo Wilson Medal. It has some notable recipients, but most are not. So I would say no per se rule on notability for mid-importance awards, just high and top. If anyone else has an opinion, please feel free to add your input.Vojen (talk) 07:45, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

1st Grande Prêmio Cinema Brasil peer review

I've just created and put the 1st Grande Prêmio Cinema Brasil article up for Peer Review with the intention of nominating it as a Featured List Candidate. I'd appreciate any and all feedback. The review is at Wikipedia:Peer review/1st Grande Prêmio Cinema Brasil/archive1‎. Thanks, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 04:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Honor-stub

Template:Honor-stub has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 70.50.151.11 (talk) 05:42, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Archived some threads

I've archived some threads which were inactive and essentially links to discussions that have since been closed. — Cirt (talk) 17:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

I replaced the broad archive banner (a slim version remains, far above) with the more visible archive box that displays beside the Contents table. And I annotated the box. --P64 (talk) 19:29, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Okay sounds good, thank you, — Cirt (talk) 16:13, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Several AFC drafts of awards-related topics

CathleenVought (talk · contribs) has submitted several draft articles through the Articles for creation process.

I suspect at least one of the photography-award-related topics is notable enough to warrant an article.

If any of these are notable, please add an {{afc comment}} near the top (below the other "afc" templates) saying as much and notify me or the last reviewer. Thanks. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:26, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/international design awards

Is Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/international design awards a notable topic? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

• No way of knowing since the creator has not provided any references. References are the basic starting point of any article. Softlavender (talk) 07:49, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
  • "No way of knowing," unless a reader of this talk page is familiar enough with the award to say "Oh, that's a well-known award" or "oh, that's a 2-bit vanity award." I'm hoping that since people who read this are interested in awards, someone might be able to fill in the blanks left by the absence of suitable references. If the topic is "known to be non-notable" then it can be declined with much stronger language than if it's just "not known to be notable." If it's "known to be notable" then it can be commented with "known-notable topic, declining due to lack of references, please work in it" or, if the reviewer has time and access to suitable sources, accepted and properly referenced. I guess what I'm trying to do is get the article in the encyclopedia if it's a notable topic or permanently discourage the submitter from trying again if it's a "known non-notable" topic. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:33, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
    • A quick Google search reveals them to be this. The content is alarmingly similar in parts to the "about" section. Checking Google News, I see no reference to these awards. There are other "International Design Awards" with press e.g. SBID International Design Awards. However, the IDA does have a website press section - see "IDA In The News". There are a few links; none scream notability. However, there is one major link to what is presumably a mention in the Financial Times; unfortunately I don't have subscription access to confirm/deny this and assert notability from it. I would question the notability unless this source has a fairly strong assertion. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 18:22, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Need help on Ian Charleson Awards

These are very highly regarded, very prestigious theatre awards in the UK; however there is little publicity and no glitz (serious actors/theatre-goers actually prefer it that way and feel it adds to their greater legitimacy). Because of the low publicity, there is less information easily available about the awards as a whole (e.g., no official website). Also, the Sunday Times, which sponsors the awards, is behind a paywall. For all of these reasons, the Wikipedia article on the Ian Charleson Awards is greatly lacking -- much information is missing, and most of what is there is uncited. If anyone would like to help out with expanding the article, please help! Even just the basic information for many years is incomplete or missing. Any additions to the article would be greatly appreciated. It would also help if you have a subscription to The Times (I don't, currently), but it's not necessary because the award information is out there on the web in other more scattered places. I also just spent many hours cleaning up the format of the article, which was a mess. I'm not 100% convinced that the format I came up with is the best one, so other opinions on that are welcome, too. Thank you very much! Softlavender (talk) 02:35, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Belated followup: I managed to get a one-month subscription to The Times, and a three-day subscription to The Times' digital archive, and printed out all of the twice-yearly Sunday Times articles on these awards, and updated and corrected and expanded the Wikipedia article accordingly. No further help needed. Softlavender (talk) 04:55, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Grammy Award templates

Suddenly many less important Grammy award templates have been created. Looking at Category:Grammy Award templates I see Template:Grammy Award for Best Pop Solo Performance, Template:Grammy Award for Best Song Written for Visual Media, Template:Grammy Award for Best Traditional Pop Vocal Album, Template:Grammy Award for Best Dance Recording, Template:Grammy Award for Best Dance/Electronica Album, Template:Grammy Award for Best Female Pop Vocal Performance, Template:Grammy Award for Best Music Video, Template:PolkaGrammy, and Template:Grammy Award for Best Pop Vocal Album have all been created unnecessarily. These are almost all basically subcategory awards of the big four. Should we delete all of these lesser Grammy award templates?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:52, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

I agree that only the "big four" should have navboxes. Others are simply coatracks of undue weight. Adabow (talk) 08:27, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

I agree, only the major four navboxes are useful. WikiRedactor (talk) 22:34, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

A bundled nomination at TfD might be in order. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Adabow, WikiRedactor, Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Come comment at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2014_July_13#July_13.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:29, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Strongly oppose this action, and the note above smacks of WP:Canvassing. An editor deciding they don't like a handful of Grammy categories, declaring them "less important" somehow, and having an unadvertised discussion with a couple of other folks on a US holiday weekend is hardly a broad consensus to delete useful navigation templates without other cause. - Dravecky (talk) 04:47, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

When are awards considered defunct?

For example PEN/Nabokov Award. Many times awards will stop operating with no notice. The only evidence is lack of evidence. At what point in time do we say the award has been non-existent for X years and therefore should be referred to in the past-tense and given a Defunct category entry? Interesting question perhaps no hard rule but raises the question about how to verify something (the award is defunct) by way of lack of sources. -- GreenC 02:37, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Good question. If you can't find evidence in the normal sources, I would try contacting the sponsoring organization directly. Sometimes there'll be an announcement of a formal withdrawal from sponsorship or closure of a prize, but these are not always well advertized. It's also fairly common for a prize to skip a year or two due to funding issues or a failure to find a satisfactory winner, so you wouldn't want to declare something defunct prematurely. If direct contact fails and it's been at least 5 years since the prize was last awarded, I'd be comfortable with an article saying something like: "The prize was last awarded in (year). The prize is now presumed to be defunct." Obviously 5 years is an arbitraty number and may not always be appropriate for prizes that are known to be sporadic or infrequent (for example, Granta has recognized the Best Young British Authors on an ongoing 10 year cycle since 1983), but if a prize that was meant to be awarded annually goes on a 5 year hiatus, it's hard to say it's still active. Even if it does come back, you could probably still say that the prize was effectively defunct for the 5 year period before it was brought back. Vojen (talk) 01:27, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Potential review needed

Hi. I have just blocked a user for adding content without sources; because of this, I do not feel like I should engage on content with him. However, noting that higher on the page he had been warned about adding sources that don't actually support the content he's placing, I took a glance at a few of the sources used in List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé and while the sources I looked at do support the content, I'm really unsure about the content. For instance, it is sourced that Beyonce is "Bing's Most-Searched Celebrity", but is this really an award or nomination? It wasn't really a competition, was it? Similarly, Guinness Book of World's Records evidently names her and her husband as a power couple; is that an award? The article is littered with such information. While this may be standard for such articles, I'm unsure due to my lack of involvement in the area, and, again, since I blocked the editor I do not feel I can become involved. I wanted to make a note in case there is an issue with bloat and somebody wanted to take a look. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 10:32, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Review Needed: Vsauce

Myself and Noyster have had a sort of disagreement about the edit to the Vsauce article made by Xtina fighter2 on 3 January 2015. It would be nice to see the appropriate authority decide whether or not the edit in question should have been reverted based on its perceived usefulness to the article. Thanks for your consideration! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crossark (talk • contribs) 23:58, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

"List of awards and nominations" vs. "List of accolades"

I've noticed a lot of inconsistency within lists of awards received in this project. Some articles, mainly films, use "List of accolades received by...", while others, mainly for individuals, use "List of awards and nominations received by..."

Shouldn't the same format be used throughout all lists? And if we're going to choose one, shouldn't we go with "accolades" since it's more concise? –Chase (talk / contribs) 01:52, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

• Note: Accolades includes any kind of honor, not just awards or award nominations. Therefore not synonymous. Softlavender (talk) 04:24, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

• But if accolades are any type of honor, then awards and nominations would be considered accolades, no? –Chase (talk / contribs) 05:11, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Some articles are only lists of awards/noms (and are restricted to such), and if they included every single honor the article would be tiresomely bloated, in some cases with insignificant trivia. It also bears mentioning that "accolades" sounds pompous and pretentious when referring to simply awards and nominations. Softlavender (talk) 06:39, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

A quick look through many of the current "film accolade" featured lists shows that many of these just include awards and nominations, with only a few containing a small handful of "runner-up", "2nd place", etc. type accolades. –Chase (talk / contribs) 12:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

"Awards and honors" (or "honours" for British topics) covers accolades, nominations, etc.. is a typical heading for literary articles. -- GreenC 14:11, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

That works for literary articles, but for e.g. performers "Awards and nominations" is a better title, because honors would become too coat-racky for many performers. In any case, either of these designations is better than "Accolades" in my view. Softlavender (talk) 00:37, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Iota Sigma Pi

Hello, if anyone has a free moment can you have a look over this article for me - I have put it as a Start-class and I am hoping to get a DYK for it at some point. I only found it through the 'Random Article' button and tried my best to improve it. Thanks ツStacey (talk) 20:50, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Highest US Army civilian award?

Please see a question at Talk:William Wiswesser and help if you can. Thanks. PamD 18:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Macklemore - Separate "List of awards and nominations received" page?

I was reviewing and copyediting the Macklemore article. I got to the Awards and nominations section and noticed it was quite long. (In addition, it seems Ryan Lewis is over wikilinked, but that's not what brought me here.) I was curious how this was handled with other artists and looked up one at random, Bon Jovi, and found a separate List of awards and nominations received by Bon Jovi article. Would this be appropriate for Macklemore? Anybody here care to take on the task of creating the list article? *Seen a Mike* 20:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Missing awards lists

It appears that there are as of yet no lists for Obie Award for Distinguished Performance by an Actor or Obie Award for Distinguished Performance by an Ensemble. The only one which has been created is Obie Award for Distinguished Performance by an Actress. While not quite as well-known as the Tony Awards, the Obie Awards for Off-Broadway theatre have been around for several decades. It seems like this would be an important addition to make. --GentlemanGhost (converse) 03:06, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Yeah. It seems like the thing about such items is that the person most interested in the matter ends up creating the lists. That's been my personal experience. So if no one jumps on board, I suggest your enthusiasm for or interest in the matter indicates you are or may be the person for the job. :-) Softlavender (talk) 03:28, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

I was afraid you might say that. ;-) --GentlemanGhost (converse) 21:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

The removal of non notable awards on film articles

There is a discussion about the removal of non notable awards on film articles here, I would love comments and thoughts to finally reach a consensus about it. LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:01, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

An RfC from that discussion: WT:FILM#RfC: Do list items need their own WP article in order to be sourced in list articles? Lapadite (talk) 14:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Mention of non-notable awards in pornography articles

There is a discussion on how to address non-notable awards in pornography articles: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Pornography#Mention_of_non-notable_awards_in_articles. We'd appreciate help creating consensus on when and how such awards are mentioned in pornography biographies and related articles. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 16:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Awards

While cleaning up an infobox, I noticed that Template:Awards emboldens the name of the award, which doesn't seem to fit with MOS:BOLD. Before I propose removal of the bold markup from the template, I thought I ought to enquire here first to see if anybody knew a reason why the name of an award should be an exception to our manual of style. Any thoughts, please add to Template talk:Awards #Bold text. Thanks in advance, --RexxS (talk) 23:43, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Help needed at List of awards and nominations received by Hugh Jackman

Help and eyes needed at List of awards and nominations received by Hugh Jackman. Right now only two are listed (one award and one nomination), and all the others have been removed. And if you try to add the others back in, you get a block message that prevents that. The block message says: "Awards and nominations must have citations to reliable sources validating each and every award received. If this edit is not an attempt to add unsourced material related to awards and nominations, please report this error." Softlavender (talk) 14:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

I don't understand your problem, Softlavender. The message told you that you couldn't add the awards and nominations without providing citations to reliable source validating each and every award received. You didn't do that: instead, you just tried to trip the filter over and over. How about finding citations to reliable sources that validate each and every award you add and including them in your edit? Then, your edit will comply with WP:V and the filter won't block it.—Kww(talk) 14:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Kww, citations are not specifically absolutely required for each and every single award in a List article for an extremely notable person, unless there is actual reason to doubt their veracity -- these awards are all a matter of public record. Cf., for instance, List of awards and nominations received by Philip Seymour Hoffman, the awards listing for a Featured Article. Or List of awards and nominations received by Meryl Streep. I would appreciate it if you would restore the 60 awards and nominations you have removed from the article, and if you would also remove the edit-block. I do not believe that the edit-block is within Wikipedia policy; nor do I believe that removal of 60 awards and nominations without notice and without Talk-page discussion is within Wikipedia policy. If you want more citations, please place a tag on the article. Right now the article has only a single award and a single nomination, making the article highly inaccurate. I believe that blocking auto-confirmed editors from restoring mass deletions without a WP:RFPP by an uninvolved admin is against Wikipedia policy. Can you tell me who created that edit-block feature and under whose aegis/guidance/discussion? Softlavender (talk) 14:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

There's no reason to carry on identical conversations in parallel. This discussion is over at Talk:Hugh Jackman.—Kww(talk) 15:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Kww If you keep this up I'll be requesting a ban on you from award articles. Your editing is irresponsible and in poor judgement.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Awards at Wikidata...

Hoi, many awards are of interest to both Wikidata and all Wikipedias. It is possible to use Wikidata as the source of data about this subject. The problem it solves is that every person with an article in any Wikipedia has a Wikidata item. Consequently, when an award is updated in Wikidata, all the articles with a list of an award can be updated. Often particularly when an award is a "foreign" award, the information at the other Wikipedia is more complete anyway.. You can piggy back on this information if you want to.

PS There are are the moment 182,635 items with "received award".. Thanks, GerardM (talk) 20:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

This is something I've wanted to do for a very long time. It's unclear how it would be structured at Wikidata as every award has its own record types to keep track of. It's not just "John Smith won a Pulitzer". The Pulitzer for example has many sub-categories of winners along with runner ups. Sometimes short lists and long lists. Sometimes co-winners. Sometimes, author + illustrator + translator (or some combo). Sometimes the award is for a book, sometimes just for the author. Each award can have its own unique fields for info to track, and those requirements could even change from year to year as the award is restructured. Then how to display the data in the award article and person article? Need templates (Lua) and each template would be customized for that particular award's requirements. It gets pretty complicated though not impossible. One concern is if it gets too complicated it will discourage editors from updating new winners, not worth the effort too much work with unfamiliar methods. What are the pros and cons. -- GreenC 20:47, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Sia Furler listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for List of awards and nominations received by Sia Furler to be moved to List of awards and nominations received by Sia. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 13:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Streamy Awards

Can anyone update this article? Happy editing! -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Peer Review for Bharat Ratna

The article on highest civilian award of India is a current GA and is put for the peer review here. I would like to take it to FAC in the near future. Any comments/feedback/corrections/guidelines are appreciated. This would be my first attempt with FAC so I am looking forward constructive criticism. - Vivvt (Talk) 10:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Notability (awards)

I have noticed that various experienced editors over the time have felt that the subject guideline "Wikipedia:Notability (awards)" should be revived. A discussion has been started at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(awards)#Revival_of_this_guideline in that effect and you are invited to give your opinion there. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Problems with BAFTA Award for Best Film article

Could people please see my comments here and share their views. I'm concerned about how the article merges together Best Film, Best Foreign Film, and Best British Film when all three categories have been separate for some time. I'm proposing splitting it. --Loeba (talk) 19:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Updates of awards information & Wikidata

Hoi, I have imported a lot of data from several Wikipedias. What I noticed is that the quality of the information is not always that great. That is in and of itself not so much of a problem. WHat is more relevant is that several fairly notable awards have not been updated with later information. Some Wikipedias do and some do not have the updated information. As the information aggregates at Wikidata it gets a higher quality.

At Wikidata we have as a policy that an award is its own item and the organisation that confers it is always separate. We can also only have entries for items and it then does not matter if there is an associated article somewhere. The challenge is to have the best information everywhere. It is technically possible to have lists with the information updated whenever something new is added in Wikidata.

Would you be interested to do an experiment with one award or maybe multiple awards?

PS this is one I am working on. Thanks, GerardM (talk) 06:31, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi GerardM, yes this is something I have wanted for a very long time, to track award winners in a database so they are available to all projects - enter winner once in Wikidata and appear in every language article automatically. I envisioned a Lua script to pull Wikidata and display-format in the award article winners section. Is this something you envision? I have written Lua script before and know how to request Wikidata. Do you want to try this for Nansen Refugee Award? It's very simple with only 1 winner per year and no finalists. The problem is each language wiki would need a language localized version of the Lua template. -- GreenC 15:56, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

I am going to do this for the Nansen Refugee Award. When you like what you see, I am happy to show you all the steps I tool. I really want to do this one myself because I am going to blog about it. Then we do a similar one together and then we look at a more complex one. Is this a plan? Thanks, GerardM (talk) 20:06, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Oh yes sure great. I'll add Nansen Refugee Award to my watchlist and/or post here anytime. Thanks. -- GreenC 22:47, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

I blogged about it> I did not change anything in the text of the award. I am now adding red links and when done I will blog again and have a result. Thanks, GerardM (talk) 08:04, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Be sure to document the variety of "display-format" that are automated. There is immense variety across the winners sections of awards articles here at EN.wiki.

On the Wikidata side I think you both plan that every award winner is a WD item --is represented by a Q-page at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki, such as D:Q4927681 for Blood Red Road. That would now sharply limit the numbers of awards whose Wikipedia tabulation of winners, not to mention winners and finalists/shortlists/runner-up/honors, may be automated via Wikidata.

In order to check the integrity of winners, or winners and others, at Wikidata it may be necessary to add a "no award" property for periodic awards such as annuals. Eg for the Carnegie Medal (literary award) at Wikidata, no award = {1943, 1945, 1966} or {1944, 1946, 1967}.

gotta go. good luck. --P64 (talk) 17:04, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

There is no problem in adding items in order to complete a list. Items do not need articles in a project. Thanks, GerardM (talk) 10:18, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

That's good to know I was also wondering about that. There is a great diversity of how awards are structured, see for example National Book Award for Nonfiction. But don't need to solve all at once (or ever), many awards are simple with a single winner no finalists or categories. -- GreenC 15:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

The Hans Christian Andersen Award is biennial with two categories, writers and illustrators (or writing/text and illustrations). There are dozens of nominees each cycle, as any national chapter of the IBBY may nominate someone. For winners, however, only 25 in number from 1966 to 2014, the illustrator award is complete at Wikidata. Every winner, such as Christine Nöstlinger d:Q93652, is a Wikidata item with property "award received" Hans Christian Andersen Award; qualifier "as: illustrator"; qualfier "point in time: YYYY". --P64 (talk) 23:59, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Academy Award for Best Directing listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Academy Award for Best Directing to be moved to Academy Award for Best Director. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:59, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Katy Perry/archive2

This is currently a candidate for FL. Comments are appreciated. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:34, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

FLRC

I have nominated List of awards and nominations received by Alicia Keys for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Examples of Listeria award lists

They can be found here. Thanks, GerardM (talk) 11:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Very interesting. A problem is no references, for example Prix Médicis has inline references but User:GerardM/Prix Médicis does not. -- GreenC 17:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

You do not get the point. The comparison is not between the articles it is about the presentation of the list. Thanks, GerardM (talk) 21:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Oh. What is the point then - where and how do you plan to use it? It can't be used on Wikipedia without references. Specifically the winners for 2013-15 which have references. -- 22:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

The references are text they can be copied like always. The award links to the official website, so you can review the data to your hearts content. Thanks, GerardM (talk) 07:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Not sure what is meant "like always". A mechanism for displaying secondary inline sources would be required. For example, to include a reference to the Washington Post for the winner of the 2010 User:GerardM/Prix Médicis. Award websites often have incomplete or missing winner information. Or additional sources are desired for whatever reason such as when the award goes defunct and there is no official website. Or the official website doesn't have a complete list of past winners which is very common, and each year's winner required a different source. -- GreenC 01:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Garth Brooks

Based on a request from Thechased (talk · contribs) at Wikipedia:Help desk#Frustrated with table, I did a technical fix for the table at List of awards and nominations received by Garth Brooks#Academy of Country Music Awards. Due to the way it was broken, I can't be sure that it is factually accurate (and the previous 2 versions were likely factually inaccurate, due to the way it was broken). Please fact check the table, it could very well have errors (most likely, wrong stuff in the wrong row type of errors). --Murph9000 (talk) 20:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Awards named after people has been nominated for discussion

Category:Awards named after people, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 11:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Featured list candidate

More input is needed on this FLC. Thanks. Lapadite (talk) 17:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Dromkeen medal listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Dromkeen medal to be moved to Dromkeen Medal. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Category:Silver Gavel Award winners has been nominated for discussion

Category:Silver Gavel Award winners, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:28, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:President's Certificate of Merit recipients has been nominated for discussion

Category:President's Certificate of Merit recipients, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:20, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:Recipients of the Médaillon Des Deux Épées has been nominated for discussion

Category:Recipients of the Médaillon Des Deux Épées, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:05, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:Russian science fiction awards has been nominated for discussion

Category:Russian science fiction awards, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for upmerging. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:Kentucky colonels has been nominated for discussion

Category:Kentucky colonels, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:Members of the Order of the Silver Elephant has been nominated for discussion

Category:Members of the Order of the Silver Elephant, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Gold medal awards listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Gold medal awards to be moved to List of gold medals. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 02:01, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

• Result The compromise from that discussion was List of gold medal awards, which was better than what I originally proposed. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:22, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:Awards with restrictions on nationality has been nominated for discussion

Category:Awards with restrictions on nationality, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Darwin Awards has been nominated for discussion

Category:Darwin Awards, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Automobile awards by continent has been nominated for discussion

Category:Automobile awards by continent, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for upmerging to Category:Automobile awards. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 04:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

I misunderstood

I was under the impression that the award was for Australian poetry - which obviously it is but not for the sort of poetry that is uniquely Australian. My entry was no doubt Hokey compared to others but it gave me a chance to set out an entry I thought was reflective of what Australia is. Good luck with the competition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.150.38.104 (talk) 12:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Using Nobel Prize.png in the userbox

Is it ok to use "" in the userbox? SoSivr (talk) 05:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

@SoSivr: So it's public domain in the US but still protected in Sweden? I think it would be fine for Nobel Prize related userboxes but I'm not sure about more broadly (although this WikiProject already uses it more broadly). I usually bring these type of questions to Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. RevelationDirect (talk) 12:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

@RevelationDirect: Using the png file for the nobel prize article is another issue. I was not talking about copyright issues. I just meant: is it ok to use the png file for the Wikiproject since it is not directly related to the nobel Prize?SoSivr (talk) 12:56, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Conceptually, it's fine by me. The Nobel Prize is a quintessential award and is already used as the this WikiProject's on the talk pages. RevelationDirect (talk) 13:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:European Car of the Year has been nominated for discussion

Category:European Car of the Year, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for upmerging to Category:Stern (magazine). A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:BCCMA Award winners has been nominated for discussion

Category:BCCMA Award winners, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:35, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Hero Cities of the Soviet Union has been nominated for discussion

Category:Hero Cities of the Soviet Union, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 12:10, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

FLC

Review needed for Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Kerala State Film Award for Best Actor/archive1. --Charles Turing (talk) 09:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Irma Black Award winners has been nominated for discussion

Category:Irma Black Award winners, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:53, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Members of the Singapore Women's Hall of Fame has been nominated for discussion

Category:Members of the Singapore Women's Hall of Fame, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Good Food Award winners has been nominated for discussion

Category:Good Food Award winners, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion and listifying. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Japan Prize laureates has been nominated for discussion

Category:Japan Prize laureates, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion and listifying. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:17, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Canadian Olympic Hall of Fame inductees has been nominated for discussion

Category:Canadian Olympic Hall of Fame inductees, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:11, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Energy Globe Award winners has been nominated for discussion

Category:Energy Globe Award winners, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:16, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:South Dakota Sports Hall of Fame inductees has been nominated for discussion

Category:South Dakota Sports Hall of Fame inductees, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Award winners has been nominated for discussion

Category:Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Award winners, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:42, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Tchernichovsky Prize recipients has been nominated for discussion

Category:Tchernichovsky Prize recipients, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:57, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Television Hall of Fame inductees has been nominated for discussion

Category:Television Hall of Fame inductees, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:00, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Canadian Business Hall of Fame has been nominated for discussion

Category:Canadian Business Hall of Fame, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:33, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Brentford F.C. Hall of Fame inductees has been nominated for discussion

Category:Brentford F.C. Hall of Fame inductees, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:14, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:South Dakota Hall of Fame has been nominated for discussion

Category:South Dakota Hall of Fame, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:18, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Auto-assessment of article classes

Following a recent discussion at WP:VPR, there is consensus for an opt-in bot task that automatically assesses the class of articles based on classes listed for other project templates on the same page. In other words, if WikiProject A has evaluated an article to be C-class and WikiProject B hasn't evaluated the article at all, such a bot task would automatically evaluate the article as C-class for WikiProject B.

If you think auto-assessment might benefit this project, consider discussing it with other members here. For more information or to request an auto-assessment run, please visit User:BU RoBOT/autoassess. This is a one-time message to alert projects with over 1,000 unassessed articles to this possibility. ~ Rob^Talk 22:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Scottish Science Hall of Fame has been nominated for discussion

Category:Scottish Science Hall of Fame, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:31, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Panasonic Gobel Award winners has been nominated for discussion

Category:Panasonic Gobel Award winners, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:17, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Africa Movie Academy Award for Best Film in an African Language listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Africa Movie Academy Award for Best Film in an African Language to be moved to Sembene Ousmane Award for Best Film in an African Language. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 06:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Benjamin Franklin Medal (Franklin Institute) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Benjamin Franklin Medal (Franklin Institute) to be moved to The Franklin Institute Awards. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 19:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Category:Rotary Foundation fellows has been nominated for discussion

Category:Rotary Foundation fellows, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Blue Ribbon Award (railway) winners has been nominated for discussion

Category:Blue Ribbon Award (railway) winners, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:44, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

National Film Awards (India) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for National Film Awards (India) to be moved to National Film Awards. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 04:14, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Category:Clare Boothe Luce Award winners has been nominated for discussion

Category:Clare Boothe Luce Award winners, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 04:32, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Prince Philip Designers Prize has been nominated for discussion

Category:Prince Philip Designers Prize, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.RevelationDirect (talk) 04:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia categories named after awards has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wikipedia categories named after awards, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion as a trial balloon to see if there is support for deleting other "Wikipedia categories named after..." categories. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 04:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

This discussion has been closed as delete, but I'm holding off on deletion for a couple days to allow editors to voice concerns if they wish to. Please do so at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Categories#Wikipedia_categories_named_after_... if you care to. ~ Rob^Talk 17:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Canadian Mining Hall of Fame has been nominated for discussion

Category:Canadian Mining Hall of Fame, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:21, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Golden Bear winners has been nominated for discussion

Category:Golden Bear winners, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:19, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Canadian Medical Hall of Fame has been nominated for discussion

Category:Canadian Medical Hall of Fame, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:22, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Jubilee 150 Walkway has been nominated for discussion

Category:Jubilee 150 Walkway, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:2008 awards in the United States has been nominated for discussion

Category:2008 awards in the United States, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion by another editor.. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by The King's Speech listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for List of awards and nominations received by The King's Speech to be moved to List of accolades received by The King's Speech. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:30, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Category:Honorary United States Marines has been nominated for discussion

Category:Honorary United States Marines, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

ESPY Awards 2010 listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for ESPY Awards 2010 to be moved to 2010 ESPY Awards. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 19:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Category:Australian science and engineering prizes has been nominated for discussion

Category:Australian science and engineering prizes, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for renaming to Category:Australian science and engineering awards. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:Scottish Engineering Hall of Fame has been nominated for discussion

Category:Scottish Engineering Hall of Fame, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:57, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:Honorary titles of the United States has been nominated for discussion

Category:Honorary titles of the United States, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:50, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:Hero Cities of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been nominated for discussion

Category:Hero Cities of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:Letelier-Moffitt Human Rights Award has been nominated for discussion

Category:Letelier-Moffitt Human Rights Award, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:21, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:National Lacrosse League weekly award winners has been nominated for discussion

Category:National Lacrosse League weekly award winners, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 04:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:NWA Wrestling Legends Hall of Heroes has been nominated for discussion

Category:NWA Wrestling Legends Hall of Heroes, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:Oklahoma Women's Hall of Fame has been nominated for discussion

Category:Oklahoma Women's Hall of Fame, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Assist with making videos for 2016 Nobel prizes

Simpleshow is an organization which produces explainer videos with Wikimedia compatible licensing. The organization is seeking volunteer Wikipedians who would collaborate with them to produce videos explaining the upcoming 2016 awards of Nobel Prizes. See details at Commons:Simpleshow#Nobel_Project_2016. Some background -

• WP:Simpleshow
• Commons:Simpleshow

Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:14, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Categories for awards

Please see a related discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2016_September_20. One of the dimensions of that discussion is that many categories in Category:Recipients of orders, decorations, and medals may be candidates for deletion. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:41, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Is this project active?

I do not see any useful discussion here. I think this project should be marked as {{inactive}}. Any objections? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Well, we're both here! I do wish there was more participation here (and in other WikiProjects) but I'll defer to your and other editors judgment here as to whether this is inactive. RevelationDirect (talk) 17:47, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

We need a notability guideline about awards

See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history#Notability_of_military_medals_and_awards. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

I missed that discussion. I think WP:OCAWARD is inadequate because it basically restates WP:DEFINING. I would rather something along the line that "if an award increases a person's notability, it's defining; if it reflects it, it's not." We can still disagree on when that happens but it at least gives us a standard. I don't see the need for separate military/civilian guideline though. RevelationDirect (talk) 17:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Ballon d'Or (1956–2009) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Ballon d'Or (1956–2009) to be moved to Ballon d'Or. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 12:30, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

New article

Hello, I'm working on this draft Hollywood Music in Media Awards, but I'm not 100% sure of its notability. I'd like to receive opinions. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Golden Mask listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Golden Mask to be moved to Golden Mask (Russian award). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:32, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Jnanpith Award

The subject article is an FL nominee since quite a long time for now and hence requesting the community to review and comment at the review. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:35, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Folio Prize listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Folio Prize to be moved to Rathbones Folio Prize. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 11:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Man Booker Prize listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Man Booker Prize to be moved to Booker Prize. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Category:Alaska Sports Hall of Fame has been nominated for discussion

Category:Alaska Sports Hall of Fame, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:38, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Recipients of the Langley Medal has been nominated for discussion

Category:Recipients of the Langley Medal, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:53, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Nobel Prize in Literature at WP:TFD

Please comment at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_January_2#Template:Nobel_Prize_in_Literature.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Can a project member help update an article with Guinness World Record verification?

On behalf of Honor, I've submitted two edit requests to update the Huawei Honor 8 article at Talk:Huawei Honor 8. One is to add an additional sentence to the "Reception" section, but more relevant to WikiProject Awards and prizes, another is to note the record for highest smartphone livestream, as verified by Guinness World Records. I've tried to make these edit requests as easy to implement as possible by clearly providing sourcing and markup to copy and paste to the article. Is there a project member who is willing to help with one or both of these requests? I can answer any questions on the talk page. Thanks for your consideration! Inkian Jason (talk) 17:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Sharon Stone

I have nominated List of awards and nominations received by Sharon Stone for featured list status here. I'd appreciate it if any of you could take a look and leave your comments. Aoba47 (talk) 21:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Razzies are not "Accolades"

A recommendation to move awards for "dubious distinciton" such as the Golden Raspberry Awards out of the "Accolades" or similarly-named sections of articles about films is being discussed at WT:WikiProject Film#Razzies are not "Accolades". davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Title of honor listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Title of honor to be moved to Title of honour. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 11:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Nominating Golden Eagle Award for Best Foreign Language Film (Russia) for featured list removal

Hi all, I'm not sure if anyone is willing to put in the effort, but I've nominated Golden Eagle Award for Best Foreign Language Film (Russia) for delisting from featured list status due to significant neglect (has not been updated in almost 5 years), and link rot (almost 40 dead links). Mattximus (talk) 17:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Similar issues are found in List of films that received the Golden Film. Mattximus (talk) 18:34, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Beatrice Hawley Award listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Beatrice Hawley Award to be moved to Alice James Award. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Upcoming "420 collaboration"

You are invited to participate in the upcoming "420 collaboration", which is being held from Saturday, April 15 to Sunday, April 30, and especially on April 20, 2017! The purpose of the collaboration, which is being organized by WikiProject Cannabis, is to create and improve cannabis-related content at Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects in a variety of fields, including: culture, health, hemp, history, medicine, politics, and religion. WikiProject Awards and prizes participants may be particularly interested in the following category: Category:Cannabis awards. For more information about this campaign, and to learn how you can help improve Wikipedia, please visit the "420 collaboration" page.

---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Paeksang Arts Awards listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Paeksang Arts Awards to be moved to Baeksang Arts Awards. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:01, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

List of awards and nominations received by The Black Eyed Peas listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for List of awards and nominations received by The Black Eyed Peas to be moved to List of awards and nominations received by the Black Eyed Peas. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 10:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

The Cheryll Tickle Medal of the British Society of Developmental Biology

In 2016, the British Society of Developmental Biology introduced the Cheryll Tickle Medal which is awarded annually to a mid-career, female scientist for her outstanding achievements in the field of Developmental Biology. The medal is received at the BSDB Spring Meeting, where the recipient presents the Cheryll Tickle Award Lecture.

Recipients:

• 2017: Jenny Nichols
• 2016: Abigail Saffron Tucker

PoppiUK62 (talk) 16:09, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Premios Feroz merges

i've proposed to merge all the subpages of the individual awards into the main page. please join the discussion on the talk page. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 17:58, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Template:PadmaBhushanAwardRecipients 1970–79 listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Template:PadmaBhushanAwardRecipients 1970–79 to be moved to Template:PadmaBhushanAwardRecipients 1970–1979. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 14:01, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Proposed deletion of Deutscher Schulbuchpreis

The article Deutscher Schulbuchpreis has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Xx236 (talk) 10:57, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Shorty Awards

As far as I can tell, the page Shorty Awards is a matter-of-fact listing of the historical events in a chronological fashion.

A user has come by with drive-by-tagging of {{COI}} and {{Advert}}, refusing to give any specifics as to why.

Attention would be appreciated, at Talk:Shorty Awards.

Thank you !

Sagecandor (talk) 17:16, 19 July 2017 (UTC)