Wikipedia talk:Reference Desk philosophies

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

"Metaphor" versus "analogy" edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I happen to think that "analogism" is a very intuitive name for the philosophy according to which the reference desk should strive to mimic a real-world reference desk.

However, I did like the changes that StuRat made to the text explaining the concepts. Maybe the word "analogism" will eventually gain strenght and become a subsection of the section Metaphor. As a non-analogist, I think that the word "metaphor" is a better description of my particular view of why the reference desk has this name, so, maybe, the two conflicting philosophies should be named "analogism" and "metaphorism" after all. A.Z. 04:23, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic