Wikipedia talk:Most smartest Wikimedia decisions
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Double sharp in topic There are so many more
There are so many more edit
The image filter was far more smartest than the visual editor, and fully deserves time here - David Gerard (talk) 07:02, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Ehh...I would personally not put the Vector skin as a most smartest decision. Anything with a functional off switch, IMHO, should not be here. Double sharp (talk) 11:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Notifications, Wikipedia:LiquidThreads (used on fr.wikipedia, I think) Double sharp (talk) 11:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- Just looked at the LiquidThreads FAQ:
- Old talk pages are not migrated into the new system.
- That sucks, but it's not an easy problem to solve.
- ROFL. Double sharp (talk) 11:43, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- I was the one that added the Vector/MonoBook switch. I made sure to mention that it was smart yet had a "critical loophole" (being able to turn it off and switch back to MonoBook.) It's not on the actual list, merely mentioned with the comment that if the "loophole" isn't patched, the skin switch won't make the list. --Yellow1996 (talk) 20:36, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- still, I wouldn't really put it in the same class of smartness as VE...at least it is just about usable and doesn't actively break pages :-P Double sharp (talk) 14:14, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
- I was the one that added the Vector/MonoBook switch. I made sure to mention that it was smart yet had a "critical loophole" (being able to turn it off and switch back to MonoBook.) It's not on the actual list, merely mentioned with the comment that if the "loophole" isn't patched, the skin switch won't make the list. --Yellow1996 (talk) 20:36, 19 July 2013 (UTC)