Wikipedia talk:Admin burnout and meltdown

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Better forms of crowd control edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

As an admim whose advice is generally considered unwelcome by most of the invited, I decline to actually edit the essay, but may I add the problem of IP edits under crowd control. In some cases, they are distinct, but the Kalamazoo Kid, among others, frequently approached the 75 edits per month on an article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:53, 26 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

I wish we could put admin burnout into a centrifuge that would tease out the extent to which IP edits are contributing to the problem. If, as I suspect, IP edits are major contributor, it might be time to ask if the wiki project has grown and matured to a point where thee costs of allowing such edits outweigh the benefits.NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 14:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic