Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/University of Maryland, College Park/Child Language (Fall 2017)

This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
Child Language
Institution
University of Maryland, College Park
Instructor
Jeffrey Lidz
Wikipedia Expert
Shalor (Wiki Ed)
Subject
Language Acquisition
Course dates
2017-08-28 00:00:00 UTC – 2017-12-19 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
20


This course examines language acquisition in infancy and early childhood, asking about the nature of children’s linguistic representations and how they acquire these representations. The coursework relies heavily on the evaluation of existing research through which we will learn about the methods and results leading to current models of language acquisition. Students will write detailed critiques of several readings in order to develop their ability to apply the scientific method. Students will also collaboratively write a Wikipedia entry about an important topic in language acquisition. This activity will develop critical reading and thinking skills, alongside scientific communication skills.

This year's Wikipedia project will involve the pages for the Poverty of the Stimulus and Negative Evidence.

Student Assigned Reviewing
Rcsender
Gty97
Zwiseguy15
Dynwrighter Indeterminacy of Translation
Prosetta
KevinHipsman Poverty of the stimulus
Cgilchri
Jchung10 Poverty of the stimulus
Shkaplow
Yvonne.luk96
Maggicurrier
Lizdahl44
Gsoyoye Poverty of the stimulus
Allexan
AllHailDolapo Poverty of the stimulus
Lord2019
Jonahcp
Octology
Roasis
Mvs526
ImJustHereSoIWontGetFined Direct Negative Evidence

Timeline

Week 1

Course meetings
Tuesday, 29 August 2017   |   Thursday, 31 August 2017
In class - Introduction to the Wikipedia project

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Please remember to check both this page and the ELMS course page regularly in order to ensure that you stay up to date on your work. 


This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia. 


This course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Content Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page. 


 To get started, please review the following handouts: 


Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account. 

Week 2

Course meetings
Tuesday, 5 September 2017   |   Thursday, 7 September 2017
Assignment - Practicing the basics
  • Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you.
  •  It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade. 
  •  When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page. 

Week 3

Course meetings
Tuesday, 12 September 2017   |   Thursday, 14 September 2017
In class - Discussion
What's a content gap?

Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.

  • Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
  • What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
  • Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
  • What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?
Assignment - Critique an article

 It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate the Wikipedia article on the Poverty of the Stimulus, and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page. 


  • Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  • Read the article, and consider some questions (but don't feel limited to these): 
    • Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
  •  Choose at least 2 questions relevant to the article you're evaluating. Leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Shkaplow (talk) 03:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC). [reply]

Week 4

Course meetings
Tuesday, 19 September 2017   |   Thursday, 21 September 2017
Assignment - Add to an article

Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:


  • Add 1-2 sentences to any course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
  •  The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement. 
In class - Discussion
Thinking about sources and plagiarism
  • Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
  • What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
  • What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
  • What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?

Week 5

Course meetings
Tuesday, 26 September 2017   |   Thursday, 28 September 2017
In class - Discussion
Thinking about Wikipedia
  • What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
  • What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
  • On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
  • If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?

Week 6

Course meetings
Tuesday, 3 October 2017   |   Thursday, 5 October 2017
Assignment - Choose your topic / Find your sources

It's time to choose an article and assign it to yourself.


  • Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
  •  Find an article from the list of "Available Articles" on the Articles tab on this course page. When you find the one you want to work on, click Select to assign it to yourself. 
  •  In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article. 
    •  Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page. 
    •  Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography. 

Week 7

Course meetings
Tuesday, 10 October 2017   |   Thursday, 12 October 2017
Assignment - Start drafting your article

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.


Creating a new article?


  •  Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox
    •  A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas. 

Improving an existing article?


  •  Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox



Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.


Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Set up a meeting with your group and one of your instructors to discuss your plans for the article and your draft in progress.


Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 8

Course meetings
Tuesday, 17 October 2017   |   Thursday, 19 October 2017
Assignment - Complete your first draft
  • Transform your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review. 
  • If you'd like a Content Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.

Week 9

Course meetings
Tuesday, 24 October 2017   |   Thursday, 26 October 2017
Assignment - Peer review and copy edit
  • First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
  •  Select two classmates’ articles that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the articles that you want to review, and then assign them to yourself in the Review column. 
  •  Peer review your classmates' drafts. Leave suggestions on on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians. 
  •  As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic? 
Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 10

Course meetings
Tuesday, 31 October 2017
Assignment - Respond to your peer review

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!


  • Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
  •  Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Content Expert if you have any questions. 
Assignment - Keep expanding your draft
  • Keep working on transforming your article into a complete draft. Keep giving/getting peer review.
  • If you'd like a Content Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.



Week 11

Course meetings
Tuesday, 7 November 2017   |   Thursday, 9 November 2017
Assignment - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace." 


Editing an existing article?


  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  • Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!

Creating a new article?


  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
  • You can also review the [[../../../training/students/sandboxes|Sandboxes and Mainspace]] online training.

For the 9th, we're asking you to submit a proposal for how you are going to move your article to the mainspace. This means listing out the changes you're planning to make to the material that already exists on Wikipedia, to incorporate the content you have built in your article. Post these proposals in your sandbox, and the instructors will review them and let you know when you can start implementing these changes on the Wikipedia mainspace.

Week 12

Course meetings
Tuesday, 14 November 2017   |   Thursday, 16 November 2017
Assignment - Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.

Week 13

Course meetings
Tuesday, 21 November 2017   |   Thursday, 23 November 2017
Assignment - Polish your work

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Content Expert at any time if you need further help!

Week 14

Course meetings
Tuesday, 28 November 2017   |   Thursday, 30 November 2017
Keep Polishing Articles

Week 15

Course meetings
Tuesday, 5 December 2017   |   Thursday, 7 December 2017
Keep Polishing Articles

Week 16

Course meetings
Tuesday, 19 December 2017
Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.


Assignment - Final article

It's the final period for develop your article. All edits must be final by 12/19.


  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
  • Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Content Expert at any time!