Wikipedia:WikiProject Zoo/Members/Coordinator Selection

WikiProject Zoo
Founded 2 December 2006
Current Coordinators Dan Koehl
General information Main page Participants Tasks Article requests Attention requests Expansion requests Image requests
Departments Collaboration
Resources Zoo article template Zoo talk page template Zoo Article Guidelines Project category WikiProject Zoo Templates

Current coordinators

The project coordinators are generally responsible for maintaining all of the procedural and administrative aspects of the project, and serve as the designated points-of-contact for procedural issues. They are not, however, endowed with any special executive powers, nor with any authority over article content or editor conduct.

Coordinators

User:Dan Koehl.

Responsibilities

The coordinators' main role is performing the maintenance and housekeeping tasks required to keep the project and its internal processes running smoothly. This includes keeping the announcement and open task lists updated, overseeing the assessment and review processes, managing the proposal and creation of task forces, and so forth. There is little that couldn't theoretically be done by any other editor, of course—the coordinators are only explicitly written into a few processes—but, since experience suggests that people tend to assume that someone else is doing whatever needs to be done, the most efficient route has proven to be to delegate formal responsibility for this administrative work to a specified group.

The coordinators also have several other roles. They serve as the project's designated points of contact, and are explicitly listed as people to whom questions can be directed in a variety of places around the project. In addition, they have highly informal roles in leading the drafting of project guidelines, overseeing the implementation of project decisions on issues like category schemes and template use, and helping to informally resolve disputes and keep discussions from becoming heated and unproductive. The coordinators are not, however, a body for formal dispute resolution; serious disputes should be addressed through the normal dispute resolution process.

Selection

Coordinators are elected by a simple approval vote of the membership, normally held every Year. Any project member in good standing may nominate himself or herself, including current coordinators, who may serve as many times as they wish. The candidate receiving the highest number of votes becomes the lead coordinator, and bears overall responsibility for coordinating the project; the other coordinators support and advise the lead coordinator, and focus on any specific areas that require special attention.

If, between elections, the project has more work than the current coordinators can handle, and no election is imminent, the coordinators may co-opt additional coordinators, to serve until the next election.

Occasionally, a motion to appoint a former lead coordinator as a coodinator emeritus is made for endorsement during an election. The objective is that the project may continue to benefit from their help and experience. The position has no special responsibilities and is held for as long as the coordinator emeritus wishes.

Nomination Code

For Nominators:
Please use the following code when nominating an Member.

===[[User:Username|Username]]===
''Nominated [[MONTH DAY]], [[YEAR]];''

Support:

1. (sign with four tildes)

Comments:

• (put your reason for nomination, sign again)

----

For Voters:
Please use the following code when voting to support a Member.

#~~~

2010 Election

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed, Coordinators are ZooPro and The Arbiter ZooPro 03:26, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

---

Please place all Nominations for the Position of Coordinator/s below. Voting will Close on the 2nd February 2010.

ZooPro The Arbiter

Nominated January 27, 2010;

Support:

1. Donlammers (talk) 13:46, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
2. --ZooFari 04:49, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
3. Belugaboy535136 ^contribs

Comments:

• Nominating as co-coordinators. ZooPro kick-started this group, and The Arbiter bridged the gap when ZooPro was out for a bit. Now they seem to be working very well together (yes, I have been watching both of user pages), so I am proposing a vote of confidence.
• Excellent teamwork, well done! --ZooFari 04:49, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
• I've checked the history of the project, and it seems things have gotten better since ZooPro came along, but The Arbiter and ZooPro put together are an undescribable mix of amazing and dazzle. Belugaboy535136 ^contribs 13:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.