Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/The World Ends with You

The World Ends with You edit

I know there's references missing in the gameplay section and if possible in the setting section, but I'm looking to see how the rest of the article works before going up the quality scale here with this. --MASEM 04:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

This article is looking good. Great work, Masem.

As you've already stated, the gameplay could use some references. I don't know if it's really a must with references in plot sections, but maybe a few wouldn't hurt.
Is it really necessary to mention the characters in the box art caption?
I saw two red links in the article. Eliminate them.
Is VG Chartz reliable? I've heard some talk about it not being reliable, but I may be wrong. Maybe Ealdgyth knows. The Prince (talk) 09:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The two last sections in "Development": "Promotion" and "Manga" are very short (1-2 sentences). I think incorporating them into larger sections would be better.
I'd include Game Rankings and Metacritic in the reviews template.
Some unnecessary links throughout the article. E.g. 2007, North America etc.
In "External links", Website" should not be capitalised.

I haven't actually read the article, so I don't know if there are any prose issues. (I wouldn't know either way, as I'm terrible with prose.) This article is at any rate at least a GA. The Prince (talk) 09:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- On the box art caption, it does help to identify the characters without adding a new piece of non-free art, and while that could be mentioned in the Characters section, it wouldn't be obvious looking at it. I'm using VGChartz right now lacking any other specific numbers; what I've seen in forums confirms these (though its hard to tell who is wagging who here), but the game hasn't cracked into NPD's numbers and Squeenix isn't saying much. --MASEM 14:12, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone is still looking at this, I would like to get some final assessments before moving the article to FAC. It has been copyedited and everything else should be good. --MASEM 16:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]