Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment/Hurricane Nate (2005)

Archived discussion. Current status: {{FA-Class}}

–Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 03:18, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Cyclonebiskit

Comments

Improve the lead, the two sentences sticking out is strange. It also has a generic start, try to make it more original
- Done –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 15:42, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A tropical wave emerged from the west coast of Africa on August 30, and maintaining a vigorous area along the wave axis, the wave tracked westward across the Atlantic Ocean. vigorous area of what?
- Fixed. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 15:42, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
By September 1, most of the deep convection had been stripped away by southwesterly wind shear. However, the wave remained well-defined as it continued towards the west-northwest. I'm a bit confused by this, how can it be well-defined if it's convection has been stripped away?
- There was no convection, but the wave was still well-defined on satellite imagery, I guess. Not sure how to explain it further. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 15:42, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Link center of circulation in the second paragraph
- Done –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 15:42, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Around the end of the second paragraph, you seem to ramble on about the trough, not sure what to say about it, but it seems strange
Did very little happen between it's peak intensity and becoming extratropical? It looks rather short (IMO)
- Well, it went from peak strength to tropical depression in a single day, so there's not much more to say.

Cyclonebiskit (talk) 03:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 15:42, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]