Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tosa-class battleship

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tosa class battleship edit

Promoted --Eurocopter (talk) 14:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator(s): —Ed (talk • contribs) and Parsecboy (talk · contribs)

Both Tosas were canceled as part of the agreements made at the Washington Naval Treaty, but Kaga was reordered as an aircraft carrier when the battlecruiser Amagi was severely damaged by an earthquake and served in the Second World War, where she was sunk. As always, all comments are welcome! Thanks and cheers, —Ed (talk • contribs) 22:18, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments I almost feel like I need to make a template for Ed articles to point out the following:

Convert templates missing on some measurements. When converting nautical miles you need to include the US measurements in addition to the metric. The US reader is still lost without them. 19,000 yards should have the miles in addition to meters or km.
~~You need OCLC numbers on your book references.~~
~~You need a blue link reduction though I'm sure you will disagree~~. --Brad (talk) 05:11, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I've delinked what I could; my apologies for the state of the article, as Parsec and I wrote most of it back in January. I'll try to get back to this later or tomorrow. —Ed (talk • contribs) 05:26, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Pics need ALT text. No sense in waiting for FAC.~~ --Brad (talk) 22:59, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Whoops, I totally forgot to get back to this. I believe that your concerns have been addressed. —Ed (talk • contribs) 23:39, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes Ed they have. Support. --Brad (talk) 01:27, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Excellent article and couldn't find any other issues. – Joe N 17:41, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:06, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.