Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Article improvement drive/Removed

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Football‎ | Article improvement drive
WikiProject on Football
Main pages
Football Assessment
Format templates
Other

This page contains nominations from the main Football Collaboration of the Week page which have been removed because they were unable to receive a certain pre-decided number of votes.

Older removed nominations: 2005 - June 2006

Eusébio (2 votes in 7 days) edit

Nominated 26 June 2006; needs at least 3 votes by 1 July 2006
Reason:

Arguably one of the greatest footballers ever, there is much more to say on this.

Support:
  1. Philc TECI 12:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Kingjeff 21:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

CAF Champions League 4 Votes in 14 days edit

Nominated 26 June 2006; needs at least 6 votes by 10 July 2006
Reason:

Africas premier club football event. Should be on an equal footing atleast with articles like UEFA Champions League.

Support:
  1. Philc TECI 12:32, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Kingjeff 21:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Bruno18 14:20, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Givern 14:17, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

FA Cup Final 1872 2 Votes in 7 Days edit

Nominated 2 July 2006; needs at least 3 votes by 9 July 2006
Reason:
  • It's only a stub which was started today.
  • The FA Cup is one of the biggest tournaments around. The final of the very first one should exist.
Support:
  1. Kingjeff 13:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  SLUMGUM  yap  stalk  16:23, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:
  • Is there much information available on this? Philc TECI
  • My sentiments exactly - what else can be added, apart from trivia which will need quite a bit of web-trawling to find and verify. Kingfisherswift 17:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Check the report that I added. There might be something there that either of you might add. Kingjeff 17:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FC Basel (2 Votes in 7 Days) edit

Nominated July 3 2006; needs at least 3 votes by July 10 2006
Reason:
  • History section starts from 1960 when it should start from 1893.
  • There are a lot of red links in the player section.
  • There is nothing about their Stadium(s), supporters, records and mangers/head coaches.
  • Is there any other wikipedia articles that can be put under a "see also" section?
  • A section about their main rival can be added.
Support:
  1. Kingjeff 04:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. kalaha 19:12, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

FIFA Women's World Cup 2007 and FIFA Women's World Cup 2007 qualification (2 Votes in 7 Days) edit

Nominated July 6 2006; needs at least 3 votes by July 13 2006
Reason:

This is a major FIFA tournament and should be prepared with a high quality standard. The qualification stage is currently in progress and should be maintained as a good page along with the tournament page.

Support:
  1. Kingjeff 04:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. StuartBrady (Talk) 02:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:
  • Improving these articles should also help to improve the quality of other women's football articles. E.g. 'wf2' templates need creating for all women's national football teams.

Fabio Cannavaro (1 vote in 7 days) edit

Nominated July 11 2006; needs at least 3 votes by July 18 2006
Reason:

Since this is the article of the FIFA World Cup winning captain, it has less information then the rest of the italian squad.

Support:
  1. KopiteCarl 11:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Joachim Löw (1 vote in 7 days) edit

Nominated July 13 2006; needs at least 3 votes by July 20 2006
Reason:

He is the new head coach for Germany. There is very little on his playing and coaching careers. There seems to be some inaccurate statistics on his playing career.

Support:
  1. Kingjeff 01:47, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Cork City F.C. (2 votes in 7 days) edit

Nominated July 14 2006; needs at least 3 votes by July 21 2006
Reason:

The article needs some clean up.

Support:
  1. Kingjeff 23:43, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. plazzTT 14:57, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Owen Hargreaves (2 votes in 7 days) edit

Nominated July 15 2006; needs at least 3 votes by July 22 2006
Reason:
  • The article is not entirely written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia entry.
  • References are needed.
Support:
  1. Kingjeff 21:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Kingjamie 17:52, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

David Trézéguet (4 Votes in 14 Days) edit

Nominated July 14 2006; needs at least 6 votes by July 28 2006
Reason:

This is almost small enough to be a stub. There should be more.

Support:
  1. Kingjeff 00:27, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. WESTSIDE 20:22, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Kingjamie 17:51, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Chupu 20:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:
  • A player of his class should have a longer article 20:23, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • This is a very well known player and it has a little information it needs more Chupu 20:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FA Youth Cup (3 votes in 14 days) edit

Nominated 25 July 2006; needs at least 6 votes by 8 August 2006
Reason:

Ridiculously short and untidy - so much more can be done with this article, e.g. first/second leg scores in finals, trivia section, records etc.

Support:
  1. Kingfisherswift 10:36, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Kingjamie 17:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Kingjeff 14:07, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Ruhrstadion (1 vote in 7 days) edit

Nominated August 1 2006; needs at least 3 votes by August 8]] 2006
Reason:
  • It's a stub. The stadium is used for top flight football in Germany. It should be considerably longer.
Support:
  1. Kingjeff 22:49, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Bayern Munich Junior Team (1 vote in 7 days) edit

Nominated August 4 2006; needs at least 3 votes by August 11 2006
Reason:

The main thing that nees to be done is to add more info. Bayern Munich Junior Team is a top Junior Team in Germany and should have much more in the article.

Support:
  1. Kingjeff 21:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Bayern Munich (womens' section)(1 vote in 7 days) edit

Nominated August 4 2006; needs at least 3 votes by August 11 2006
Reason:
  • Incomplete team squad.
  • It's only a stub. Needs more info.
Support:
  1. Kingjeff 21:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

English football on television (1 vote in 7 days) edit

Nominated August 9 2006; needs at least 3 votes by August 16 2006
Reason:
  • Currently reads more like Manchester United on television.
Support:
  1. Oldelpaso 20:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

CONCACAF Champions' Cup 2002 (1 vote in 7 days) edit

Nominated August 10 2006; needs at least 3 votes by August 17 2006
Reason:
  • Mostly needs formatting, wiki-linking
  • Tables are all different sizes
  • Apply any other competition template standards
Support:
  1. Rballou 19:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Watford F.C. (3 votes in 14 days) edit

Nominated 10 August 2006; needs at least 6 votes by 24 August 2006
Reason:
  • A good article, but not the standard of other premiership teams. I nominated it once before, but due to the World cup being on at the time it didn't receive much work, so I feel it should be renominated.
Support:
  1. Kingfisherswift 11:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Kingjeff 13:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Kingjamie 20:02, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

David Villa edit

Nominated 30 August 2006; needs at least 3 votes by 6 September 2006
Reason:

Quite short and unstructured for an article on a player of repute and recent track record.

  • 25 goals(2nd top scorer) last season in UEFA's top seeded league.
  • 3 world cup goals inspite of not even starting all of the 4 matches he played in.
  • With Valencia playing Champions League this season, if the player lives up to his billing, there would be lot of visits to the english article on him.
Support:
  1. Su30 08:21, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Kingjeff 18:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:
  • Received a third vote a day late.

Nouvelle Fédération-Board member's teams edit

Nominated 31 August 2006; needs at least 3 votes by 7 September 2006
Reason:

Near enough every team on this list has no information or information verging on the lower side of ultra-sub-basic. Though not strictly 1 article, I'm sure a lot can be offered to the lot of them. The teams in question:

Support:
  1. Kingfisherswift 10:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Chris Larkin 18:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Football at the 1996 Summer Olympics - Men's team squads (3 votes in 14 days) edit

Nominated 2 September 2006; needs at least 6 votes by 16 September 2006
Reason:
  • Very incomplete, does not look good.
  • Everyone can contribute.
Support:
  1. Punkmorten 10:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Kingfisherswift 12:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Kingjamie 13:32, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:
  • It could also benefit from creation of articles about the players.

List of European football managers (2 votes in 7 days) edit

Nominated 12 September 2006; needs at least 3 votes by 19 September 2006
Reason:

Something that, with a bit of work, could easily become a Featured List. It's something that everyone could pop into, do couple of rows, then go off and do something else!

Support:
  1. HornetMike 01:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I've already changed a few countries from the nation to "XX national football team" and introduced flag icons for some. Will do more when I canDodge 04:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:
  • I think the article should be renamed or moved to List of European national team managers (I know, I know about the words "national team"...) because a list of European football managers could be endless. Agree with your point though Dodge 03:45, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

F.C. Internazionale Milano (5 votes in 14 days) edit

Nominated September 11 2006; needs at least 6 votes by September 25 2006
Reason:
  • Probably one of the leading teams in the world, needs a massive cleanup, lacks of historical information and probably needs to be even heavily restructured.
Support:
  1. Angelo 13:52, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oldelpaso 20:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Nach0king 12:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. WESTSIDE 17:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Serte 15:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Ernst Happel (2 votes in 7 days) edit

Nominated 27 September 2006; needs at least 3 votes by 4 October 2006
Reason:

One of the best managers from the past, becoming a legend at almost every club he showed up. The main issues of his career are discribed, but are in need of a huge improvement and much more detail then what's written right now.

Support:
  1. SportsAddicted 00:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Kingjeff 18:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Jim Baxter (1 vote in 7 days) edit

Nominated September 30 2006; needs at least 3 votes by October 7 2006
Reason:

Arguably the best Scottish footballer ever, and in his time one of the best players in the world. The article is far too short and doesn't provide many statistics or detailed information of his career.

Support:
  1. Archibald99 10:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Heysel Stadium disaster edit

Nominated 26 September 2006; needs at least 6 votes by 10 October 2006
Reason:
  • The Heysel Stadium disaster is one of the biggest tragedies to ever hit football. I have attempted over many months to improve this article, but very often people write on the talk page apparently disgusted by the bias present in the article. I have asked for a peer review — but got no response. I have asked for help before. Perhaps this nomination will help get people to notice that this article could do with some attention. At the very least it'd be good for people to check the article for any perceived biases and report them on the talk page. However I am more looking for new editors to take over the article. I feel that I've taken it as far as I can. aLii 16:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support:
  1. aLii 16:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Archibald99 16:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. QmunkE 10:31, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Marcus Allbäck edit

Nominated October 3 2006; needs at least 3 votes by October 10 2006
Reason:

Part of the Swedish national team, and UCL participants F.C. Copenhagen. The article is far too short and doesn't provide many statistics or datailed information of his career.

Support:
  1. kalaha 09:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jerr 02:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:
  • I second the reason. Allback is one of the greatest modern players - yet his bio on Wiki is so short? Jerr

Roberto Baggio edit

Nominated 28 September 2006; needs at least 6 votes by 12 October 2006
Reason:

A poor article about one of the greatest footballers ever, the last Italian to win the Golden Ball. Great if improved to FA.

Support:
  1. Angelo 16:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Archibald99 22:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oldelpaso 10:30, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Czech Republic national football team edit

Nominated October 11 2006; needs at least 3 votes by October 18 2006
Reason:

Same grounds as Uruguay team. Also would like to menton that there are literally hundreds of National Team Articles which are ridiculously short - Maybe we should organise some sort of mass improvement?

Support:
  1. Kingfisherswift 17:59, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Archibald99 18:15, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:
  • Like the idea of improving all the national team articles which are too short. Archibald99 18:15, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article reeks of recentism. Why is the 2006 World Cup so prominent in the article? Punkmorten 17:29, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, it's been the first time the Czech team qualified to the World Cup. Before that, it was Czechoslovakia. --Angelo 14:07, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tobias Linderoth (3 votes in 14 days) edit

Nominated October 14 2006; needs at least 6 votes by October 28 2006
Reason:

Very short for the midfield dynamo and vicecaptain for Sweden and F.C. Copenhagen-captain. He is a great player and has competed for Sweden at the last two World Cups.

Support:
  1. kalaha 17:57, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Kingjeff 17:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Dk-fck 19:25, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Volkswagen Arena (2 votes in 8 days) edit

Nominated October 23 2006; needs at least 3 votes by October 30 2006
Reason:

It's just a stub. It's a football stadium that host the 5th best league in Europe and a league that has unmatched attendance in Sports. There must be something to add despite only being 5 years old.

Support:
  1. Kingjeff 00:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Superlinus 12:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Weserstadion (2 votes in 8 days) edit

Nominated October 23 2006; needs at least 3 votes by October 30 2006
Reason:

It's just a stub. It's a football stadium that host the 5th best league in Europe and a league that has unmatched attendance in Sports. This stadium holds the team to last dethrone Bayern Munich. There must be some scoring record or something that can be added.

Support:
  1. Kingjeff 00:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Superlinus 12:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Åge Hareide (1 vote in 7 days) edit

Nominated 25 October 2006; needs at least 3 votes by 1 November 2006
Reason:

Horrible article. Could easily be expanded, and lists replaced with prose.

Support:
  1. Punkmorten 12:15, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:
  • Any Man City or Norwich fans around who can help with this? Punkmorten 12:15, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That'll be me. While I don't currently have access to all my books about City, I've not found much in the ones I have to hand. I don't think my programme collection has any from those two seasons either. His time at the club was undistinguished, he only made a total of 17 starts + 8 sub. Unfortunately I doubt I could add more than about one or two sentences. I think he fared better at Norwich though. You could try User:Dweller, who is a Norwich fan. Oldelpaso 19:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

José Mourinho (1 vote in 7 days) edit

Nominated 30 October 2006; needs at least 3 votes by 6 November 2006
Reason:

Probably currently the best football coach in the world: In his first 2 complete seasons as a manager, he won 2 Portuguese championships, 1 Portuguese Cup, a Champions League and a UEFA Cup with FC Porto. Then, two English Championships in two years. A very dividing and controversial figure: either you like him or hate him; called by some as an arrogant, by others as a genius. He deserves a better article. He's one of the main figures of the sport in the world.

Support:
  1. Serte 22:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Duncan Ferguson (1 vote in 7 days) edit

Nominated November 5 2006; needs at least 3 votes by November 12 2006
Reason:
  • This article of a fairly notable Scottish footballer but it needs major improvment. Things that need fixing arte citing sources and fixing factual accuracy disputes and if these problems are fixed "Big Dunc's" article will have the capabilites of a good article.
Support:
  1. Kingjamie 00:00, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Alf Ramsey edit

Nominated 13 November 2006; needs at least 3 votes by 20 November 2006
Reason:

This article, about England’s greatest football manager, has been improved a lot over the past few months, but still needs vast improvement.

e.g. No infobox; his playing career, both at club and international level, is covered very sketchily; and the whole section on his career as England manager could do with a acomplete re-write to remove a lot of the POV stuff.

Support:
  1. Daemonic Kangaroo 06:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Celtic F.C. edit

Nominated 13 November 2006; needs at least 3 votes by 20 November 2006
Reason:

Just list upon list upon list, and the only thing before 2003 is a link to History of Celtic F.C., which could be merged in and trimmed down anyway. Although a good article anyway, it just needs a bit of fine tuning, and this is the best way to do it.

Support:
  1. к1иgf1$н£я5ω1fт 17:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Kingjeff 01:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Gay Football Supporters Network (3 votes in 14 days) edit

Nominated 12 November 2006; needs at least 6 votes by 26 November 2006
Reason:

Small article on a nationwide organisation that works closely with English Football Association in a anti-homophobia campaign & provides a forum for homosexual football fans. Now the subject of as much focus as the anti-racism campaign in the 1980s. Possibly the largest LGBT-associated football organisation in the United Kingdom. Requires minor expansion (especially Campaigning section) & currently has few links from other articles.

Support:
  1. Apex204 18:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Kingjeff 17:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Australian Matt 13:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Asociación Deportiva Carmelita edit

Nominated 4 December 2006; needs at least 6 votes by 10 December 2006
Reason

This article is in the status of a stub, so it may be needed to be expanded where the status of the article can be updated to the next level, I know that it may not generate the support, but at least I try to help this Costa Rican team.

Support:
  1. Rakuten06 18:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC) (as nominator)[reply]
Comments

Liverpool_F.C. (5 vote in 10 days) edit

Nominated 21 December 2006; needs at least 3 votes by 28 December 2006

Reason: This article is linked to all over the internet and it is very poorly written. I know that people worked out the kinks getting out the megalists of players and things, but maybe now we can work on the grammar, focus, and logic of the article. Such an important team should be a featured article.

Support:
  1. ChrissMari 20:02, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Hallam F.C. (1 vote in 9 days) edit

Nominated 22 December 2006; needs at least 3 votes by 29 December 2006
Reason:

This team played in Northern Counties East League Premier Division, so this club should be worked on to the full extent of this club (history, players, records, and honours). Also that this club is, surprisingly, the second oldest club in football history.

Support:
  1. Rakuten06 13:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

New York Cosmos (2 votes in 9 days) edit

Nominated 22 December 2006; needs at least 3 votes by 29 December 2006
Reason:

One of the most well know American clubs with a huge influence on American soccer today. A very disorganized article that doesn't include very much information and has lots of red links. м info 18:21, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support:
  1. м info 18:21, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. AJSDA115 14:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Liverpool F.C. (1 vote in 7 days) edit

Nominated January 2 2007; needs at least 3 votes by January 9 2007
Reason:

This is the most decorated team in English Football. The article does not follow an encyclopedic tone. There are many citation needed tags, and it was recently delisted from Good Article Status. Such an important club in football should have a well written article. Please consider helping this article out!

Support:
  1. ChrissMari 23:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Tostão (2 votes in 7 days) edit

Nominated January 12 2007; needs at least 3 votes by January 19 2007
Reason:

Tostão is one of Brazil's greatest players and one of the stars on Brazil's 1970 World Cup dream team. He was also Pelé's strike partner for a long period in the 60's/70's. Nowadays he is considered one of the greatest and most respected football pundit and jornalists in Brazil. This article is missing a lot, it is even considered a stub, but with some work this article can achieve the same standards the Garrincha article achieved.

Support:
  1. AJSDA115 00:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ChaChaFut 02:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Club Brugge (3 votes in 14 days) edit

Nominated January 27 2007; needs at least 6 votes by February 10 2007
Reason:

One of the most successful clubs in Belguim has a very poor article.

Support:
  1. Pelotastalk 13:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Cream147 23:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Defy 23:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. м info 01:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:
  • Awful article, for the biggest and most well-known club in Belgium, it deserves better. Cream147 23:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of eponyms of stadiums (1 vote in 7 days) edit

Nominated 29 January 2007; needs at least 3 votes by 5 February 2007
Reason:

This list really has potential for expansion.

Support:
  1. Punkmorten 09:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Dario Gradi (2 votes in 7 days) edit

Nominated January 31 2007; needs at least 3 votes by February 7 2007
Reason:

A man who has, in the words of the BBC, "stood the test of time" - Oh, and he's given the footballing world a few well known players to boot ;-)

Support:
  1. Skully Collins Edits 15:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Cream147 Shout at me for doing wrong 19:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Brookhattan edit

Nominated February 14 2007; needs at least 3 votes by February 21 2007
Reason:

One of the greatest soccer clubs in American history, they were the first to win an American treble and provided many players for the US's 1930 FIFA World Cup, where a Brookhattan player scored the infamous winning goal against England. This article needs some help with logo, colour's, and history.

Support:
  1. AJSDA115 23:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
COmments:

Rafael van der Vaart edit

Nominated February 17 2007; needs at least 3 votes by February 24 2007
Reason:

For a highly notable player, the article is still a stub and information is dated.

Support:
  1. Archibald99  17:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Themcman1 17:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Coventry City F.C. edit

Nominated February 23 2007; needs at least 3 votes by March 2 2007
Reason:

A decent article, but does need a prose adjustment and a reshuffle of sections. With a bit of luck and sorting it could be enough for GA status - the core info's there, but it needs to be easier to find.

Support:
  1. к1иgf1$н£я5ω1fт 19:02, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Davnel03 21:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

R.S.C. Anderlecht edit

Nominated February 26 2007; needs at least 3 votes by March 4 2007
Reason:

Very good article, possibly improveable into featured article?

Support:
  1. Pelotastalk 23:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oldelpaso 13:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:
  • Decent content, needs a referencing drive. Oldelpaso 13:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Bradley edit

Nominated March 25 2007; needs at least 3 votes by April 1 2007
Reason:

Michael is one of the up-and-coming stars in America, and his article could certainly use improvement. I don't really expect this to get voted for, but the article would definitely be better with just a little more organization, and I'm not exactly sure how that should be approached.

Support:
  1. Che84 00:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. AJSDA115 13:36, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Lincolnshire Senior Cup edit

Nominated April 2 2007; needs at least 3 votes by April 9 2007
Reason:

Despite being somewhat of a niche subject, I believe that this article needs some serious cleaning up. I've done the best I can so far to improve this article, however, due to lack of information, I'm having trouble adding more. There's also many disputes as to who was the outright winner of a said competition, or whether it was shared or not. Everyones knowledge may solve this problem!

Support:
  1. Cintrianex 13:00, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

F.C. Internazionale Milano edit

Nominated April 23 2007; needs at least 3 votes by April 30 2007
Reason:

Inter Milan, i.e. the new Italian champions. This article needs quite a massive cleanup, and much more reference to its early history, especially in the 1960s (the so-called Grande Inter times).

Support:
  1. Angelo 12:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. NotoriousTF 21:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

Alf Ramsey edit

Nominated April 29 2007; needs at least 3 votes by May 6 2007
Reason:

This man was the only manager to take England to a World Cup final.

The article is riddled with PoV and inconsistencies, is badly written and needs someone to take hold of it and produce an article worthy of his achievements.

Support:
  1. Daemonic Kangaroo 06:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Soopa hoops77 13:42, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. ChaChaFut 04:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

European Super Cup edit

Nominated May 17 2007; needs at least 3 votes by May 24 2007
Reason:

Poor article for the Super Cup. The tables does not look good. The article should be better for a match between the UEFA Champions League and UEFA Cup winners.

Support:
  1. kalaha 09:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. WATP  (talk) • (contribs) 11:35, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Pelotastalk 23:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Sir-Nobby 13:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/Article_improvement_drive/Removed&oldid=1147972616"