| Edit Count
|
Username
|
Position Summary
|
Note
|
Source/Quote
|
Jayron32
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (0/1) |
EncMstr |
- |
*Maintenance |
|
|
|
| 1 (0/1) |
Eric |
- |
*Maintenance |
|
|
|
| 1 (0/1) |
Johnny Au |
- |
*Maintenance |
|
|
|
| 1 (0/1) |
Minimac |
- |
*Maintenance |
|
|
|
| 1 (0/1) |
TedPavlic |
- |
*Maintenance |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Amire80 |
- |
*Comment |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Jalexander |
- |
*Maintenance |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Soap |
- |
*Maintenance |
|
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Samantha.pia |
- |
*Confused |
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28proposals%29/Proposal_to_require_autoconfirmed_status_in_order_to_create_articles&diff=424840763&oldid=424837225 |
|
|
| 7 (6/1) |
Philippe (WMF) |
- |
*Maintenance |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Bk314159 |
- |
*Comment |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Bronsonboy |
- |
*Comment |
|
|
|
| 20 (0/20) |
SineBot (bot) |
- |
*BOT |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Jenks24 |
- |
*Maintenance |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Kathyfeller |
- |
*Comment |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Kfederme |
- |
*Comment |
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Mr.Z-man.sock |
- |
*Comment |
|
| 1 (1/0) |
RFC bot (bot) |
- |
*BOT |
|
| 2 (0/2) |
Bloffy |
- |
*Maintenance |
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Linu5kay |
- |
*Vandalism |
|
| 2 (2/0) |
AGiorgio08 |
Alternative, (Unique) |
*Self-removed |
\'Semi-support\'\': I do believe that some sort of action should be required to help the workload
|
| 2 (2/0) |
BeenChanged |
Alternative, (Unique) |
|
I believe only those who are willing to make a simple userpage and account should be trusted to make quality Wikipedia articles
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Blackwidowhex |
Alternative, (Unique) |
|
Wikipedia could detect if a new user adds an article without references and then stop the article from being created. And have the create new article pages written with \"may be deleted\" big and bold
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Steelpillow |
Alternative, (Unique) |
|
If we do anything it should be incremental. One might begin by say watermarking suspect articles, and allowing only autoconfirmed users to remove the watermark.
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Robman94 |
Alternative, Plrk |
|
Plrk: You should only be able to create an article if there is one or more articles in the main namespace linking to it
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Plrk |
Alternative, Plrk |
|
Plrk: You should only be able to create an article if there is one or more articles in the main namespace linking to it
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Enfcer |
Alternative, Werespielchequers |
*Comment Removed |
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28proposals%29/Proposal_to_require_autoconfirmed_status_in_order_to_create_articles&diff=424114315&oldid=424110547
|
| 1 (1/0) |
The Land |
Alternative, Werespielchequers |
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Morgankevinj |
Alternative, Werespielchequers |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Shipsview |
Neutral, (Unique) |
|
Have I got this wrong?
|
| 1 (1/0) |
WIERDGREENMAN |
Neutral, (Unique) |
|
Not going to give an opinion right now
|
| 1 (1/0) |
LordVetinari |
Neutral, (Unique) |
|
I\'d support the proposal and even recommend the edit count and account age criteria be higher and more stringent. However, this not only risks going against policy
|
| 20 (15/5) |
Cenarium |
Nuanced, (Unique) |
*comments on trial |
|
| 7 (7/0) |
Guymacon |
Nuanced, (Unique) |
|
While I support the basic idea of requiring the use of a wizard in order to create articles, I strongly oppose any proposal for a \"trial\" until I recieve some sort of assurance that the trial will not be extended indefinitely
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Wayne Roberson, Austin, Texas |
Nuanced, Malleus Fatuorum |
DGG, Cardamon too |
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Deadagain33 |
Oppose, (Unique) |
|
I do not thing that people should be subject to the encouragement of \"mass editing\" in order to create said article
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Mike Cline |
Oppose, (Unique) |
|
I oppose this tactical change not on the basis of merit, but because it doesn\'t seem that any of the arguments, pro or con are being made in light of the overall wikimedia strategy
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Mr Grim Reaper |
Oppose, (Unique) |
|
I do not support this. What would it solve? It shuts people out
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Peter coxhead |
Oppose, (Unique) |
|
at present I\'m against the change
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Pi |
Oppose, (Unique) |
|
I think that by placing more and more restrictions on new users we will discourage people from getting involved
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Quintucket |
Oppose, (Unique) |
|
I had a lot to say, but I realized most of it was just a complaint about how picky Wikipedia\'s new article standards are
|
| 1 (1/0) |
WikipedianMarlith |
Oppose, (Unique) |
|
I believe the autoconfirm threshold is not right now necessary
|
| 2 (1/1) |
Halo |
Oppose, (Unique) |
|
I think this trend should be reversed. IP article creation should be turned on
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Dankarl |
Oppose, (Unique) |
|
Oppose. There are users who would rather jump in and create a new article and they may be the better informed users with writing and research experience in other venues
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Jtbobwaysf |
Oppose, (Unique) |
|
I agree with 76strat and oppose this proposal. This is an effort to make it more difficult to create new articles, and is i am sure widely supported by the \"Deletes.\"
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Kiwhan |
Oppose, (Unique) |
|
I DISAGREE. Uh... I\'m new to Wikepedia. (I think) I think new users like me who are still having problems acting or editing in Wikepedia, would never have any mind left to think about autoconfirmed or something. What if starters feel uncomfortable about this rule and just stop editing.
|
| 2 (2/0) |
ZoneAlarm5 |
Oppose, (Unique) |
|
I don\'t think this will change the amount of vandalism, just relocate it.
|
| 3 (3/0) |
My76Strat |
Oppose, (unique) |
|
I think we have the best balance achievable, currently in place. After consideration, I believe we should keep everything related, as it is.
|
| 4 (4/0) |
CycloneGU |
Oppose, (unique) |
|
No, we should not limit article creation only to those who earn the AutoConfirmed status.
|
| 5 (5/0) |
Kaldari |
Oppose, (unique) |
|
This semester alone, we have several hundred college students adding new Wikipedia articles through the public policy initiative. If we implement this policy, we won\'t be seeing any more of that in the future.
|
| 14 (14/0) |
BarkingFish |
Oppose, (Unique) |
|
Absolutely no way should this be put into effect.
|
| 1 (1/0) |
216.38.130.166 (anon) |
Oppose, DGG |
*SPA? |
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Avicennasis |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Bejnar |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Blackrock01 |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
C628 |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Cbrown1023 |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Duttler |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Ephebi |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Errectstapler |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Falcorian |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Jnast1 |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Jorm (WMF) |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
JoshuaZ |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Marcusaurelius161 |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
RJC |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Rosiestep |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Scray |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
|
|
| 2 (1/1) |
Moneya |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
ClemRutter |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Frickeg |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Kingpin13 |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
NeilK |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Slowking4 |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Tibetologist |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
|
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Dream Focus |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
|
|
| 7 (5/2) |
Anetode |
Oppose, DGG |
|
|
|
|
| 1 (0/1) |
TomStar81 |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (0/1) |
Wiki ian |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Adallas |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
AshLin |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Blackhawk441 |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Bulwersator |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Carrite |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Charles Edward |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Chester Markel |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Christopher Parham |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Curiocurio |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Deb |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Dennis Brown |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
DrPoque |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
E2eamon |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
EnOreg |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Feedintm |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
FeydHuxtable |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Gk sa |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
HighSocietyCanada |
Oppose, Ironholds |
*SPA? |
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Holmwood |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
J\'ai os� |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Jimbobolaffsson |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Jkslouth |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
JoeyD2010 |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
JuanR |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Julle |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Jztinfinity |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
LiteralKa |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Mactrac |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Manishearth |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Mark Mukasa |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
NativeForeigner |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
NERIUM |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Qrsdogg |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Reaper Eternal |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Richardofoakshire |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Roberterubin |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Rpeh |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Sindinero |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
SteveStrummer |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Stickee |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Wareh |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Whpq |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Yogesh Khandke |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Zenswashbuckler |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Andre Kritzinger |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 11 (10/1) |
Protonk |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 13 (13/0) |
WereSpielChequers |
Oppose, Ironholds |
*Also added alternate view supported by both sides |
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (1/1) |
Darion29 |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (2/0) |
AbsolutDan |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Bailo26 |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Chick Bowen |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Contains Mild Peril |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Ddama |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Glorioussandwich |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Headbomb |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Hobit |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (2/0) |
J Milburn |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Juliancolton |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Ladislav the Posthumous |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Sjakkalle |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Spinningspark |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Torchiest |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Xymmax |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 3 (1/2) |
Rgrant |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 3 (2/1) |
DJ Magician Man |
Oppose, Ironholds |
*Name Change |
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Angusmclellan |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Davewild |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Hydroxonium |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Melchoir |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Michaeldsuarez |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Sadads |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 3 (3/0) |
SoWhy |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 3 (3/0) |
The ed17 |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Twilsonb |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 4 (3/1) |
DGG |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Abductive |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Alzarian16 |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 4 (4/0) |
CT Cooper |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Joy |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Philip.t.day |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Ruslik0 |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 4 (4/0) |
ThatPeskyCommoner |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 5 (4/1) |
Paine Ellsworth |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 5 (5/0) |
Enric Naval |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 5 (5/0) |
Graeme Bartlett |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 5 (5/0) |
Johnsemlak |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 6 (5/1) |
TotientDragooned |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 6 (6/0) |
Orionist |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 7 (7/0) |
Jamesofur |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 9 (8/1) |
Ironholds |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Gwern |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Levalley |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Maunus |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Res2216firestar |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
Ironholds
|
| 2 (2/0) |
A Stop at Willoughby |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Hullaballoo Wolfowitz |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Jane023 |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Dr. Blofeld |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Ser Amantio di Nicolao |
Oppose, Ironholds |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Sctechlaw |
Oppose, Natgertler |
|
Natgertler: I agree with those who say that this would set an unnecessary bar.
|
| 2 (2/0) |
NatGertler |
Oppose, Natgertler |
|
I agree with those who say that this would set an unnecessary bar
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Eagles247 |
Oppose, no trial |
*migrated comment |
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Proposal to require autoconfirmed status in order to create articles/Discussion on running a trial
|
| 11 (10/1) |
Bob House 884 |
Oppose, no trial |
*migrated comment |
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Proposal to require autoconfirmed status in order to create articles/Discussion on running a trial
|
| 1 (0/1) |
V111P |
Oppose, Orionist |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
VishalB |
Oppose, Orionist |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
KidGwakebake |
Support, 3 Month Trial |
*migrated comment |
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Proposal to require autoconfirmed status in order to create articles/Discussion on running a trial
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Jamietw |
Support AfC, (Unique) |
|
sometimes articles written by new users can by really good, therefore I believe that we should force all users who are not confirmed or auto-confirmed to use the article wizard or articles for creation
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Bassist DaTaco |
Support AfC, Sven Manguard |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Fnlayson |
Support AfC, Sven Manguard |
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Safety Cap |
Support AfC, Sven Manguard |
|
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Takamaxa |
Support AfC, Sven Manguard |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Richukuttan |
Support Cautious, (unique) |
|
I feel that, though 10 edits are too much, atleast 2 or 3 of them should be made by a person before he can make a page.
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Al Lemos |
Support Cautious, Both |
*Confirmed Both |
|
Jayron32 |
Ironholds
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Pitke |
Support Cautious, Both |
*Confirmed Both |
|
Jayron32 |
Ironholds
|
| 1 (1/0) |
28bytes |
Support Cautious, Cardamon |
|
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Cardamon |
Support Cautious, Cardamon |
|
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Cynwolfe |
Support Cautious, Cardamon |
|
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Farscot |
Support Cautious, Cardamon |
|
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Obsidian Soul |
Support Cautious, Cardamon |
|
|
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
CharlieDelta |
Support Cautious, Cardamon |
|
|
|
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Teles |
Support FR, (Unique) |
|
Instead of forcing registration, we could, however, think about a way of reviewing articles created by non-confirmed accounts like it is already done by reviewers (Pending changes). |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
AGK |
Support FR, AGK |
|
A suitable compromise would be that anonymous users can still create new articles, but that pages they create are not viewable except to them and to registered users until the article has been confirmed |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Drew.ward |
Support FR, AGK |
|
|
|
|
| 6 (5/1) |
Marcus Qwertyus |
Support FR, AGK |
|
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
TParis |
Support FR, Chzz |
|
|
|
|
| 10 (8/2) |
Chzz |
Support FR, Chzz |
|
|
|
|
| 3 (1/2) |
Alex146 |
Support FR, Chzz |
|
|
|
|
| 7 (7/0) |
69.111.194.167 (anon) |
Support FR, Chzz |
|
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
AndreisEntaro |
Support FR, Collect |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Collect |
Support FR, Collect |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Yellow Evan |
Support FR, Collect |
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Filelakeshoe |
Support FR, Collect |
|
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Certes |
Support FR, Collect |
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Gigs |
Support trial, Daniel Case |
|
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Daniel Case |
Support trial, Daniel Case |
|
|
| 1 (0/1) |
Ekin |
Support trial, Fetchcoms |
|
Let\'s do this. Simple and true. End of anonymous vandalism.
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Nat682 |
Support trial, Fetchcoms |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
NuclearWarfare |
Support trial, Fetchcoms |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Tomcloyd |
Support trial, Fetchcoms |
|
|
| 1 (0/1) |
Mainframezen |
Support trial, Shooterwalker |
*SPA? |
|
| 1 (1/0) |
SunCreator |
Support trial, Shooterwalker |
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Measure for Measure |
Support trial, Shooterwalker |
|
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Airplaneman |
Support trial, Shooterwalker |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Snowman304 |
Support, \"90 day trial\" |
*Migrated Comment |
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Proposal to require autoconfirmed status in order to create articles/Discussion on running a trial
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Crossmr |
Support, \"Just Do It\" |
*migrated comment |
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Proposal to require autoconfirmed status in order to create articles/Discussion on running a trial
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Swpb |
Support, \"Just Do It\" |
*migrated comment |
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Proposal to require autoconfirmed status in order to create articles/Discussion on running a trial
|
| 1 (0/1) |
V�r�s |
Support, (Unique) |
|
I agree with this proposal. I also believe that newly submitted articles should be reviewed by an administrator
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Albicelestes |
Support, (Unique) |
|
I think 10 edit is not enough to learn,making more than 50 edit is better.
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Barts1a |
Support, (Unique) |
|
I personally think that this proposal is a good idea. It will allow users to learn the basics by editing existing articles rather than learning only how to get a slap on the wrist for creating a non-notable article
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Burhan Ahmed |
Support, (Unique) |
|
Yes, it should be the case because of increased number of vandalism on Wikipedia!
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Crisco 1492 |
Support, (Unique) |
|
It would improve the quality of the encyclopedia enormously if editors could focus on that instad of hundreds of new articles that violate policy.
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Jam1991 |
Support, (Unique) |
|
It only makes sense. It\'ll prevent pointless articles from being created and will help ensure that more of the new articles are actually subjects that are worthy of receiving their own article.
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Jezhug |
Support, (Unique) |
|
I think that 10 edits is quite fair to ensure that new users learn the ropes before jumping into a new page
|
| 1 (1/0) |
MaxWyss |
Support, (Unique) |
|
I agree with this proposal because wikipedia needs quality more than numbers of editors
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Metalfan1976 |
Support, (Unique) |
|
And by forcing people to sign up with a valid account to contribute will lessen the clutter, make the job of the moderators easier, and improve the reputation of wikipedia as a whole.
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Msrafiq |
Support, (Unique) |
*Comment Removed |
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28proposals%29/Proposal_to_require_autoconfirmed_status_in_order_to_create_articles&diff=424365987&oldid=424359915
|
| 1 (1/0) |
RA0808 |
Support, (Unique) |
|
I agree. The autoconfirm threshold can act as a safeguard to ensure that a new user could learn the ropes and be able to create an article that meets Wikipedia\'s guidelines.
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Thisthat2011 |
Support, (Unique) |
|
To create articles I think should need autoconfirmed status.
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Timshuwy |
Support, (Unique) |
|
I agree with the concept... brand new users should have some form of review prior to publication
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Train2104 |
Support, (Unique) |
|
If necessary, we can raise this to 25 edits and decrease the time requirement to 2 days. This will help distinguish legitimate alternate accounts from new users.
|
| 1 (1/0) |
WikiCopter |
Support, (Unique) |
|
if you aren\'t autoconfirmed, you probably didn\'t edit enough to know what goes into an article and what doesn\'t.
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Yankeesrule3 |
Support, (Unique) |
|
I think that this is incredibly good idea.
|
| 2 (1/1) |
Prashantserai |
Support, (Unique) |
*Unsigned |
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28proposals%29/Proposal_to_require_autoconfirmed_status_in_order_to_create_articles&diff=424837125&oldid=424820759
|
| 2 (1/1) |
Tenebrae |
Support, (Unique) |
|
I agree with this proposal, and given Wikipedia\'s widespread credibility problem overall, I would, in fact, like to see more stringent safeguards on editing. Forbidding anonymous IPs
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Filmmaker2011 |
Support, (Unique) |
|
I agree with the proposal, however the biggest problem I see in the subject areas I am looking at (the arts) is the huge numbers of people joining to create their own personal CV page as an article with zero notability
|
| 2 (2/0) |
N419BH |
Support, (Unique) |
|
Therefore, I strongly support requiring Autopatrolled rights in order to create a new article without AFC
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Popa01 |
Support, (Unique) |
|
Controling new users ability to create new pages is a step in the right direction.
|
| 3 (3/0) |
75.57.242.120 (anon) |
Support, (Unique) |
|
adding more filtering wins in all ways: improves WP content, decreases newbie biting, and gets closer to the founding principles vision that editors without accounts still have something close to full privileges
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Arghyadeepd |
Support, (Unique) |
|
Okay! I too agree with the motion
|
| 3 (3/0) |
HTMLCODER.exe |
Support, (Unique) |
|
4 days and 10 edits seems reasonable enough, if not, it\'s a topic for another discussion. What I want to say is that such \"delay\" should greatly reduce numbers of \"lol dongs\" and similar in Newpages
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Themane2 |
Support, (Unique) |
|
I support this notion. Wikipedia needs to cut down on spamming
|
| 10 (9/1) |
NickPenguin |
Support, (Unique) |
|
We should only allow auto confirmed users to create articles, simply because the kinds of articles that still need to be created, and the standards we hold new articles to now, take a little more effort and a little more knowledge of how the community operates
|
| 11 (9/2) |
Promethean |
Support, (Unique) |
|
Creating articles is allot like uploading images and we don\'t allow non auto-confirmed users to do that, so this would also bring things into line with other areas.
|
| 15 (15/0) |
Fishhead2100 |
Support, (Unique) |
*name: Mr. C.C |
Couldn\'t the number of days and edits be upped? Maybe to sevens and 15 or 20 edits with them being reviewed.
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Tim bates |
Support, Barts1a |
|
Barts1a: I personally think that this proposal is a good idea. It will allow users to learn the basics by editing existing articles rather than learning only how to get a slap on the wrist for creating a non-notable article.
|
| 2 (2/0) |
BilCat |
Support, Brammers / Bobrayner |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
FCTS 142 |
Support, History2007 |
|
History2007: I support this as another step along the path of the end to the \"total freedom paradigm\". |
|
| 1 (0/1) |
Grapple X |
Support, Hominidmachinae |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Alarics |
Support, Hominidmachinae |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Bluerasberry |
Support, Hominidmachinae |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Golgofrinchian |
Support, Hominidmachinae |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Mgcsinc |
Support, Hominidmachinae |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Perchloric |
Support, Hominidmachinae |
|
|
|
| 2 (0/2) |
OliverTwisted |
Support, Hominidmachinae |
|
|
|
| 2 (1/1) |
Hekerui |
Support, Hominidmachinae |
|
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Joe Decker |
Support, Hominidmachinae |
|
|
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Johnuniq |
Support, Hominidmachinae |
|
|
|
| 6 (6/0) |
HominidMachinae |
Support, Hominidmachinae |
|
the quality of Wikipedia, and its long-term prospects would be better served by limiting article creation. |
|
| 1 (0/1) |
Ajraddatz |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (0/1) |
Canticle |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (0/1) |
Dragfyre |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (0/1) |
STSC |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (0/1) |
Arjayay |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Aaditya 7 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Adamrce |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Albacore |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Alexf |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Alfie66 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
AndyTheGrump |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Artoasis |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
AussieLegend |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Badgernet |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Bentogoa |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
BigDom |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Buckshot06 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Captain Screebo |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Chris.urs-o |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Cliff |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Coemgenus |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Cullen328 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
CutOffTies |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Cyphoidbomb |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
DeltaQuad |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Deyyaz |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Doctorcito |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Dp76764 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Dzlife |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Edison |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Ericleb01 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Ericorbit |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Evanh2008 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
EVula |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Fyrael |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Ghostshock |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Glenn L |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Greenshinobi |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Guoguo12 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Hardik4 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Hchc2009 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Hkcd1265 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Hut 8.5 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Iadrian yu |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Imzadi1979 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Jahahn |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Jcgoble3 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
JimMillerJr |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Jsayre64 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Kafziel |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
KarikaSlayer |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Karl 334 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Killiondude |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Lanthanum-138 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Lugnuts |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Marie Poise |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
MauchoEagle |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Michael Bednarek |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Mittgaurav |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Mkativerata |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Moray An Par |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Mystylplx |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Neutron |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Nev1 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Ntsimp |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
NYyankees51 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Ohnoitsjamie |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Openskye |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Parrotistic |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Patitomr |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Pdcook |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Phase Theory |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Phospheros |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Pichpich |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
PREVRAVANTH |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
PRL42 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Qwyrxian |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Racepacket |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Sandstein |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Sarah777 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Schlitzer90 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Scjessey |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Sgt. R.K. Blue |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Shajure |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
SheepNotGoats |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Shrike |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Shuipzv3 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
SnehaNar |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
SoCalSuperEagle |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Soosim |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Spartaz |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
STATicVerseatide |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Tbhotch |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Tentontunic |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Teukros |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Theoboyd |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
TheTechFan |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
TomorrowsDream |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Tony1 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Trilobitealive |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Uncle Milty |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
USchick |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
78.26 |
Support, Jayron |
*Weird Name |
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
VoxLuna |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Warren Whyte |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Webwires |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Wikidas |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Wizardman |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Ynhockey |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
YuYuNinjaGaiden |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Zlqq2144 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Σ |
Support, Jayron |
*Name Change |
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
A ntv |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Bender235 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Dahn |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 10 (10/0) |
Bahamut0013 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 10 (10/0) |
Beeblebrox |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 10 (10/0) |
Fetchcomms |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 10 (10/0) |
WhatamIdoing |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 10 (8/2) |
Cybercobra |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 10 (9/1) |
Kvng |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 11 (10/1) |
Kudpung |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 11 (11/0) |
Jayron32 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 11 (11/0) |
Jclemens |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 11 (11/0) |
Ronhjones |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 11 (11/0) |
SilkTork |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 12 (11/1) |
John Vandenberg |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 12 (12/0) |
Guerillero |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 12 (12/0) |
Herostratus |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 12 (12/0) |
MC10 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 13 (13/0) |
Bobrayner |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 13 (13/0) |
M4gnum0n |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 16 (15/1) |
Tijfo098 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 16 (16/0) |
Armbrust |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 19 (12/7) |
Malleus Fatuorum |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (1/1) |
Btphelps |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Binksternet |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Blue Square Thing |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Burpelson AFB |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Coren |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Frozen Wind |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Johnbod |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Kansan |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Mo ainm |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Mr. Stradivarius |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Nashville Monkey |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Nightenbelle |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Nyswimmer |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Ponyo |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
RadManCF |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Ruby2010 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
SchuminWeb |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Sitush |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Thomas888b |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 2 (2/0) |
TransporterMan |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 21 (21/0) |
Shooterwalker |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 25 (23/2) |
Danger |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 25 (23/2) |
Rivertorch |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 3 (2/1) |
Loadmaster |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 3 (2/1) |
UncleBubba |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Berean Hunter |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Captain panda |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Cuprum17 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Rschen7754 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Seraphimblade |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Stifle |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Thehelpfulone |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Timotheus Canens |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Worm That Turned |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Yaksar |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 33 (33/0) |
The Blade of the Northern Lights |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 4 (1/3) |
Baseball Watcher |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 4 (3/1) |
Ron Ritzman |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 4 (4/0) |
A p3rson |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 4 (4/0) |
CRGreathouse |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Dcoetzee |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 4 (4/0) |
First Light |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Pol430 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Stevietheman |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 5 (5/0) |
Apuldram |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 5 (5/0) |
Feezo |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 5 (5/0) |
Korruski |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 55 (55/0) |
History2007 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 6 (5/1) |
Seb az86556 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 6 (6/0) |
Silver seren |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 7 (4/3) |
Dabomb87 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 7 (4/3) |
Jebus989 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 7 (6/1) |
Snottywong |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 7 (7/0) |
Fluffernutter |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 7 (7/0) |
Nolelover |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 71 (67/4) |
Rd232 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 8 (3/5) |
JaGa |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 8 (8/0) |
Belovedfreak |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 8 (8/0) |
Beyond My Ken |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 8 (8/0) |
Hrafn |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 8 (8/0) |
Sven Manguard |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 9 (8/1) |
JayJasper |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 9 (9/0) |
Benlisquare |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
Jayron32
|
| 1 (1/0) |
DavidHobby |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Elekhh |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Fram |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Glenfarclas |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Jclavet |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Nafsadh |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Nyttend |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Ravenswing |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
SlimVirgin |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Sole Soul |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Spencer |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Steve2011 |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Tarc |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
|
| 2 (1/1) |
Sunray |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Brianann MacAmhlaidh |
Support, Jayron |
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Otelemuyen |
Support, Jayron |
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Ratibgreat |
Support, Jayron |
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Gb105 |
Support, Jayron |
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Mabdul |
Support, Jayron |
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Basket of Puppies |
Support, Jayron |
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Department of Redundancy Department |
Support, Jayron |
*DoRD
|
| 4 (4/0) |
H3llkn0wz |
Support, Jayron |
|
| 4 (4/0) |
Unscintillating |
Support, Jayron |
|
| 10 (10/0) |
MER-C |
Support, Jayron |
|
| 11 (11/0) |
Jennavecia |
Support, Jayron |
*name: Lara
|
| 12 (3/9) |
Brammers |
Support, Jayron |
|
| 13 (13/0) |
Donald Albury |
Support, Jayron |
|
| 15 (15/0) |
Yoenit |
Support, Jayron |
|
| 28 (26/2) |
Mr.Z-man |
Support, Jayron |
|
| 7 (4/3) |
Ancient Apparition |
Support, Jayron |
|
| 8 (6/2) |
Forty two |
Support, Jayron |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
RobinLeicester |
Support, Jezhug |
|
Jezhug: I think that 10 edits is quite fair to ensure that new users learn the ropes before jumping into a new page.
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Aldnonymous |
Support, Malleus Fatuorum |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
JDDJS |
Support, Malleus Fatuorum |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Pedro |
Support, Malleus Fatuorum |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Wolfehhgg |
Support, Malleus Fatuorum |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Xionbox |
Support, Malleus Fatuorum |
|
|
| 2 (0/2) |
Chaosdruid |
Support, Malleus Fatuorum |
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Mojoworker |
Support, Malleus Fatuorum |
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
MuZemike |
Support, Malleus Fatuorum |
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Volunteer Marek |
Support, Malleus Fatuorum |
|
|
| 3 (2/1) |
Anna |
Support, Malleus Fatuorum |
*anndelion |
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Aiken drum |
Support, Malleus Fatuorum |
*AD |
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Ianlopez12 |
Support, purplepox01 |
|
purplepox01: Agreed. That would be a good tool as considering the recent articles that appears to be based on crap.
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Purplepox01 |
Support, purplepox01 |
|
Agreed. That would be a good tool as considering the recent articles that appears to be based on crap.
|
| 1 (0/1) |
Srays |
Support, Rivertorch |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Chuckster2.0 |
Support, Rivertorch |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Coroboy |
Support, Rivertorch |
|
|
| 1 (1/0) |
Interferometrist |
Support, Rivertorch |
|
|
| 2 (2/0) |
Nightscream |
Support, Rivertorch |
|
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Diannaa |
Support, Rivertorch |
|
|
| 3 (3/0) |
Nczempin |
Support, Rivertorch |
*comment removed? |
|
| 3 (3/0) |
UncleDouggie |
Support, Rivertorch |
|
|
| 19 (17/2) |
SDY |
Support: prepare, implement, review |
|
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Proposal to require autoconfirmed status in order to create articles/Discussion on running a trial
|
| 28 (21/7) |
RedactionalOne |
Support: prepare, implement, review |
*migrated comment |
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Proposal to require autoconfirmed status in order to create articles/Discussion on running a trial
|
