|
- Wikipedia:Article titles
- In WP:TITLE#Deciding on an article title, changed: "As part of this, a good title should convey what English, in an encyclopedic register, actually calls the subject (this does not mean Wikipedia must follow other encyclopedias' titles)." to: "As part of this, a good title should convey what the subject is actually called in English."
- In WP:TITLE#Common names, added: "Other encyclopedias may be helpful in deciding what titles are in an encyclopedic register, as well as what name is most common (see below)."
- In WP:TITLE#Non-neutral but common names, added: "Further, even when a neutral title is possible, creating redirects to it using documented but non-neutral terms is sometimes acceptable; see WP:RNEUTRAL."
- In WP:TITLE#Precision and disambiguation, added: "Often there is no alternative to parenthetical disambiguation, and it does have the advantage that the non-parenthesized part of the title may most clearly convey what the subject is called in English. On the other hand, such disambiguations may be longer or less natural than an alternate but unambiguous form, when there is one."
- In WP:TITLE#Article title format, added: "To italicize a title, add the template {{italic title}} near the top of the article: Use of italics should conform to WP:ITALICS."
- In WP:TITLE#Italics and other formatting, added: "In addition, certain templates, including Template:Infobox book, Template:Infobox film, and Template:Infobox album, will by default italicize the titles of the pages they appear on; see the pages for those templates for details."
- In WP:TITLE#Titles containing "and", added: "however, "Media's coupling of Islam and terrorism" may be acceptable."
- Wikipedia:No original research
- In the introduction, removed: ["original research" ... refers to any analysis or synthesis] "by Wikipedians" [of published material ...]. Added: "Despite the need to attribute content to reliable sources, you must not plagiarize them. Articles should be written in your own words while substantially retaining the meaning of the source material."
- In WP:NOR#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources, added: "Unless restricted by another policy," [primary sources that have been reliably published may be used in Wikipedia, ...]. Added: "Use extra caution when handling primary sources about living people; see WP:BLPPRIMARY, which is policy." Added: "Whether material counts as a primary or secondary source is not fixed. A book by a military historian about the Second World War might be a secondary source of material about the war, but if it includes details of the author's own war experiences, it would be a primary source of material about those issues."
- In WP:NOR#Citing oneself, added: "In fact, expert input is encouraged and experts often have specific knowledge of the relevant literature."
|
