Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 March 20

March 20 edit

Template:Infobox shahnameh characters edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Not needed. Templates like {{Infobox person}} appear to work fine at articles like Rostam. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:30, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Either {{Infobox person}} or {{Infobox character}} can work here. Gonnym (talk) 21:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If it is not useful, I agree to delete it Barfir (talk) 14:12, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Time zone? edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:14, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep guessing it would be as useful as other article cleanup templates. Just not known for users. Pelmeen10 (talk) 23:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The fact that this has lain forgotten for 11 years is much stronger evidence than Pelmeen10's guessing. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:27, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Genshin Impact edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:MiHoYo. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:23, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consists of 3 blue links and 2 red links (both of which most likely won't be blue for a while), one of the blue links is most likely more appropriate merged into the actual article, otherwise the links can all simply be included in the see also section for the main article making a template completely unnecessary. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:29, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dhaka Dynamites current squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:05, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Team now known as Dhaka Dominators, and there is a new template for that team name: Template:Dhaka Dominators squad. This is not a current squad, as it's a squad template from circa 2015. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).