Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 August 7

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< August 6
August 8 >

August 7 edit

Template:Standard atomic weight of the elements edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep * Pppery * it has begun... 21:57, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single use article content table. Subst into article and delete template. Gonnym (talk) 06:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I didn't jump to nominate this one some time ago because the Template:Standard_atomic_weight_of_the_elements/row subtemplate is a bit more complex than your average row. Are you suggesting to subst those uses also? Izno (talk) 19:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Those can be kept if they are useful, like other table row templates. The table itself though isn't anything unique that it has to live in the template space. Gonnym (talk) 19:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The /row template is used in only one place, the same as the parent template. Izno (talk) 19:45, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    True, but expanding it 118 times might be a bad choice in this situation (if we still want to use the sub-templates it uses and not plain numbers directly). Gonnym (talk) 05:46, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Gonnym Right, that's why I said I hadn't nominated the top-level. Keeping a single-use row template is as bad as keeping the table template to which it belongs. Izno (talk) 06:03, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Sure, then I withdraw my nom. Gonnym (talk) 14:08, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Withdrawn but can't be closed since someone !voted delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 14:14, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 16:48, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

'''Keep'''. per the Izno/Gonnyms conversation Mason (talk) 02:00, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Regardless of my vote, since the argument above states why it can't be subst, this can be closed as keep. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:European Para Championships edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:08, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 is the first occurrence of this event, and as such, there are not enough blue links to warrant a template anytime soon. There are 2 links, and we generally require around 5 for a valid template, which is unlikely to happen until 2035 (as the Championships is once every 4 years). Both articles listed are linked to each other in the articles anyway, and so this template is not needed until such a time as there are enough links to justify a template. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IPAc-uk edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No tranclusions, documentation, or incoming links from discussions. Created in 2018. Appears to be an abandoned test. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:54, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vietnamese film list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar with only two blue links. The navbox Template:Cinema of Vietnam is used (which itself only has the same two links). Gonnym (talk) 08:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Unknown parameters category/sort text edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2019. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table legend/Category-ptg-blind edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table legend/Category-blind edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2018. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table (metalloid)/Periodic table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:05, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Created in 2014. Previously kept in 2019, but does not appear to have been used or useful since then, and most of the other templates kept in that discussion have since been deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table (by noble metals) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Created in 2016. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:26, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table (32 columns, micro)/metals-metalloids-nonmetals edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:26, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table (32 columns, detailed cells) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Created in 2012. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox locomotive/param-transl-row edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The template that it may have been used in has been deleted as of last week. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox element/symbol-to-top-image/overview edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or template parameters. Created in 2017. If this is a reference page for a WikiProject, it should be moved to Wikipedia space. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox currency/talktable edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2022. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Index to chemical element pages/template pages inline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Created in 2019. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ISO 4217/code-to-iso-name edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2022. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:16, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ISO 15924 name/fr edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:16, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IPAc-es/pronunciation/parameters edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:14, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IPAc-en/core edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links from discussions. Created in 2011 by an experienced template editor. May have been superseded, or may have been an experiment, or something else. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IPAb edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. Created by an editor who has a recent history of creating one-off templates with no documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IPA vowels/accessible edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2018. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IPA chart/table vowels with audio edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created by a now-indefinitely-banned editor in 2011. These are subpages of a template redirect that redirects to one of its own subpages, confusingly. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:09, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cathead victorian era passenger ships of the edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. It is unclear to me how this became orphaned recently (in the last week). Its content is similar to that of Category:Victorian-era passenger ships, but not exactly, so it does not appear to have been used there. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:05, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but it looks like collateral damage from rationalising the category tree for Victorian-era ships. Category:Victorian-era passenger ships of the United Kingdom should be a subcat of Category:Victorian-era merchant ships of the United Kingdom per WP:SUBCAT, but wasn't, with some articles in both. I couldn't find any explanation for "Cathead" in H:CAT or WP:CAT, but by all means revert this if I am mistaken, though some explanation would be welcome. Davidships (talk) 09:34, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If that was the only category it was used on that it wasn't really useful anyways. Gonnym (talk) 09:47, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mestis teams edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content with no template parameters, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. Subst into article and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:49, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:50, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. A simple table is enough for that. – sbaio 13:34, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_August_7&oldid=1170575164"