Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 November 24

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< November 23 November 25 >

November 24 edit

Template:Hawthorn best and fairest (AFL Women's) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:23, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A template with one entry, for a non notable award. Fram (talk) 13:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:26, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – this is ridiculous; it's an AFLW club best and fairest award that at least warrants mentioning in the player's article, even if the award isn't considered ready to have its own article yet, so what's wrong with/what's the rule against having a navbox? 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 01:01, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • A navbox is meant to navigate between articles. A navbox for one article defeats it purpose. Fram (talk) 09:20, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I can't find an indication of how many times an annual award must be awarded before it gets a navbox and article. The award is clearly going to be awarded every year that the team exists. Hawthorn was just slow getting in to AFLW. The fact that there has only been one winner so far still carries information. --Scott Davis Talk 12:41, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • For a navbox, the absolute minimum would be two, one would think (I wouldn't create it before there were at least three or four instances of something notable, but that's personal opinion). Or perhaps we can start creating navboxes for all clubs which don't have such an award at all? The fact that there has been no winner so far still carries information as well. Fram (talk) 13:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • It has two links - the award and the first winner. I agree I wouldn't have created it yet either, but as others have said, it will be created next season or the one after anyway. --Scott Davis Talk 03:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as per User:4TheWynne – especially as it will just be recreated next year/season, or the year/season after by the logic above. Storm machine (talk) 01:56, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:30, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Russian–Chinese Winter Youth Games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fails NENAN. Only three links. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:44, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no point in deleting any wikipedia article because it has inadequate sources. If in this case, then many articles would have been deleted Sharontse121 (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete only 3 blue links (plus the article name itself), which is not enough to justify a template. Especially as all 3 blue links are currently being discussed for deletion, and seems likely that they'll be deleted. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:02, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Short track speed skating at the Russian-Chinese Winter Youth Games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:46, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only one link to an article that is the subject of an Afd. Above all else, fails NENAN. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:42, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gymnastics at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Qualified NOC's edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:46, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused chart/table. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:32, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Cinécoles Short Film Prize at the Marrakech International Film Festival Awards edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:45, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only one link. Fails NENAN. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:31, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Golden Star Grand Prize Short Film at the Marrakech International Film Festival Awards edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. ✗plicit 23:44, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and no links to any film articles. Even on the main article there are no links to articles on any short film winners and will likely not pass notability. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:29, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite letter/core edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Presumably, this was orphaned when the parent template was converted to Lua in approximately 2013. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:24, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Historical content top edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:49, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Created in 2013, but appears to have not been adopted or to have been superseded and replaced by templates like {{cot}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:18, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mf-big edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:49, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Created in mid-2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:09, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Most populous cities of Gabon edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:49, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The information exists in a better table at Gabon, the only article where this template is usable. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:08, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ntsgaps edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:49, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The only incoming link from a discussion refers to this template as "temporary". – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:53, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TCACycle WP78 offset edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:36, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links from discussions, categories, or documentation. Created in 2010. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:32, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TAU edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:36, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The entire contents of this template are &Tau;. It also appears to be redundant to {{tau|uc=true|noitalic=true}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:24, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tissue distribution of estradiol and other estrogens edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:36, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links from discussions, or documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:20, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tracklisting/Track edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:37, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This is an unused subpage of a redirect that has been a redirect since 2011. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:19, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Willmonitor edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:37, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links from discussions. Created in 2018. Does not appear to have been adopted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:16, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:F1 race position 2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:37, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Created in June 2022. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:10, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_November_24&oldid=1125162151"