Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 November 10

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< November 9 November 11 >

November 10 edit

Template:Inside Man edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed, only two articles in this series. ★Trekker (talk) 22:43, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Point Break edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless, only 3 articles here. ★Trekker (talk) 22:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Day Off edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:18, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After cleaning up all the barely related content and redirects there are only 3 actual articles here. ★Trekker (talk) 22:32, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wastelanders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:52, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless, used to have a bunch of sections and redirects but once those were removed there are only 3 pages to link to. And it was made by a sockpuppet. ★Trekker (talk) 22:21, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Reservoir Dogs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:53, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless navbox, it contained a bunch of barely related topics which I had to remove. Also seems it was originally created by a sock puppet. ★Trekker (talk) 22:12, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Malaysian exit number templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:52, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These templates applied unneeded text styling for numbers in the exit column of a junction list table. First, each added the word "EXIT" in front of the number, which duplicated the heading at the top of the column. Second, the templates applied boldface in contravention of MOS:BOLD or MOS:RJL. Third, they applied a colored background just to the text and number, presumably to imitate actual exit number signs, something we don't do elsewhere. This colored background was also problematic in imitating signage as there was usually a line break between the word "exit" and the number, so the imitation was very poor. I removed the unneeded formatting, leaving just a number displayed, meaning the templates are pointless, so they've ben substituted and can be deleted. Imzadi 1979 → 22:10, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wrcode edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:48, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Following a discussion at WT:RU, this template attempts to add statistics to rugby union articles that are uncalled for. The information included is not useful, nor is it ever backed up by any sources in any of its many uses. – PeeJay 21:50, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sixteen Candles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:41, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I find this template unnecessary for several reasons. First, it is based on the assumption that the remake 15 Candles will come out, which is untrue, since it is only in development and can fail to proceed. So this template unduly highlights Selena Gomez's name and unduly lists 15 Candles as an outright film (when it is just a project). Furthermore, ideally, articles should be cross-referencing each other. For the "Music" section, only the song "16 Candles" actually has that term mentioned in it. None of the other music-related links mention "16 Candles" in any capacity. Regarding the Shermer High School connection, that is not even mentioned in 16 Candles or Ferris Bueller's Day Off. Not to mention that the "Characters" category with just a side character being linked (along with a tangential broad-scope article) seems awkwardly forced in. There is no good reason to have this template. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 16:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC) Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 16:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Have removed 15 Candles and unnecessary music links; keeping template only to film, video game, related, and characters. Vexedsmuggery (talk) 18:07, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I find this a minor improvement but still insufficient. The 2019 video game is not even a standalone article, it's a line in a table in a broader article. The Sherman High School connection is still nonsense with the film article not mentioning it at all, and there is literally nothing in the top search engine results for the film plus high school name. I don't even see the relevance of Young Frankenstein's Frau Blucher, and Google shows nothing at all. The template is full of tenuous and nonexistent connections. Plus TV episodes doing a riff of some famous film does not make for a "universe" of links. We don't need a template at all here. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 15:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Only two articles directly or about the film. The main film article and the character of Long Duk Dong. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 21:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:24TeamBracket-NHL-reseed edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:21, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transcluions. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as template creator. Given that this is related to an ongoing MOS:COLOR issue across multiple sports templates that have been replaced and that the potential replacement colours don't look very good, I'm fine letting this one go. Deadman137 (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1967 Stanley Cup playoffs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single use. Subst and delete to 1967 Stanley Cup playoffs. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:22, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Di edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barely used (each use can be subst:'d), "di" also stands for "delete image", not "diff". Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 18:49, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020 Massachusetts State Collegiate Athletic Conference football standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and won't be because there is no place to transclude this. But more importantly, the lack of information can't be fixed because the MSCAC did not play in any games for the 2020–21 NCAA Division III football season. So a standings template is not needed. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:42, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:16TeamBracket-NHL Divisional edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:47, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Replaced by {{16TeamBracket}} per prior discussions and MOS:COLOR. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:30, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Species description edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of species described in 2022, it was agreed that all articles in this template should be deleted, therefore the template is redundant. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:07, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rdconfigarray edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 November 17. ✗plicit 23:57, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:16TeamBracket-StepladderToQF edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:10, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Permil edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:04, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged this for speedy deletion back in July. Recreated since and still unused like last time. All it contains is text. Not sure what function this is to serve. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:07, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep and undelete page history, since the original speedy deletion was clearly contested. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:38, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How is this a keep? Contested and since still serving no function. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This was an invalid speedy under G2 (fyi @JBW). Given its disuse, it should however probably be deleted. Izno (talk) 22:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 12:45, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: unused. If consensus is reached to keep the template, its history should be undeleted as a contested speedy. HouseBlastertalk 19:45, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep, permil is hard to type, but make it substitute only like {{minus}}. Frietjes (talk) 21:55, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FC UTA Arad seasons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:09, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with zero blue links. Created in 2018, transcluded only in the parent article. No navigational value. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:05, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oklahoma City Energy FC squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:08, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

team is not active; no need for current squad template Joeykai (talk) 02:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 18:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:58, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - defunct team has no current squad, so does not need a 'current squad' template. GiantSnowman 18:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Austin Bold FC squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:06, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

team is not active; no need for a current squad template Joeykai (talk) 02:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 18:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - defunct team has no current squad, so does not need a 'current squad' template. GiantSnowman 18:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_November_10&oldid=1122760333"