Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 May 12

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< May 11 May 13 >

May 12 edit

Template:6TeamBracket-NCAA8 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:59, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by {{6TeamBracket | legs = 3/1}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 23:59, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:6TeamBracket-NCAA5 with 3rd edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by {{6TeamBracket}}.. –Aidan721 (talk) 23:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:6TeamBracket-3GameFinal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by {{6TeamBracket | legs = 1/1/3}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 23:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:6TeamBracket-2legSF edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by {{6TeamBracket | legs = 1/2/1 | aggregate = y}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 23:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Radic2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:05, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Random template I made more than a year ago that has never been actually used in an article. Indeed, the template it aimed to extend ({{radic}}) is deprecated in MOS:MATH. Not sure if this can be speedied per me being the sole author, but if so, that's cool. Ovinus (talk) 22:57, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GarageGames edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Even if all four articles are kept, this would still fail WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mila Mason edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 May 19. Izno (talk) 20:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Contains Meitei text edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Contains special characters. Izno (talk) 20:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Contains Meitei text with Template:Contains special characters.
All of these contain special characters templates were merged into a centralized template. This should join them. Additionaly, Wikipedia:Meitei script display help should be merged into Help:Multilingual support. Gonnym (talk) 09:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:49, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GOs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused {{Station link}} wrapper. Had one remaining usage which I converted. Gonnym (talk) 08:44, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep despite all transclusions being mass substituted in the past week, I find this template useful and likely to be used in the future. It is a low maintenance template so there is no harm in keeping it. BLAIXX 13:50, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    While this has "low maintenance" per your argument, the other option has none and is also clear to any editor what the template does as "GOs" is a meaningless name to most editors. Gonnym (talk) 14:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not sufficiently complicated to warrant a template wrapper, just pass {{Station link|GO Transit|...}} directly. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Metro access edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template is used in two articles where it is used to color text in a seemingly arbitrary color. If there is meaning behind the color, it is not explained. However, even if there is reason to this specific color, this still seems unnecessary. Gonnym (talk) 08:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Planned Paris metro lines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:52, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single use table template which should be subst into article and deleted. Gonnym (talk) 08:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Paris metro lines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:52, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single use table template which should be subst into article and deleted. Gonnym (talk) 08:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Agreed, copy into article and delete it. FiP (talk) 09:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Easy cleanup and related templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions except in the creator's user page. Non-standard and redundant to other cleanup templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. These shouldn't be used at all. Gonnym (talk) 08:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't find Template:Useful contribs any better. Gonnym (talk) 08:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/KSR left/Hwanghae Chongnyon Line and 60+ related North Korea S-line templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. All relevant articles have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/KSR. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:16, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:East Midlands Trains lines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions except in one demonstration on a talk page. These templates either were never adopted or were replaced by the updated Module:Adjacent stations/East Midlands Railway and similar subpages. Note: since these pages have no transclusions or so few transclusions, it is not entirely clear to me that they should be lumped together. I am happy to withdraw this nomination or make a new Adjacent stations module subpage if necessary. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Earthquake energy class edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 May 19. ✗plicit 06:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ESPN NHL edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This template appears to have been used in articles ten years ago, but it is no longer used. It is unclear why. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:59, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ENA edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:31, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed in 2014, never adopted. Presumably this template is not usable, not needed, or served by a different template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:57, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EMD switchers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:32, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, except in a WikiProject's template list. Appears to be redundant to {{EMD diesels}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:55, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EMA source edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:33, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, or categories. Documentation does not explain what it might be used for. Created in 2017. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:54, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, speedy. Obviousy no use. (I created this one). Speedy=OK too. (Not sure if I would disturb te XfD process by db-tagging it now myself). -DePiep (talk) 06:29, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ECP topicon edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading topicon showing edit-confirmed protection. Used misleadingly on one User page. Delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:50, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dysphemism edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:35, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly named proposed article maintenance template (proposal here) that was rejected in favor of existing templates. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/LRBoat left/RB1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:35, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. All relevant articles have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/London River Services. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dubbing edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:36, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2019, and does not appear to have caught on. Probably not useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:31, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dilatory edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:36, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions of this anti-AGF template. It didn't catch on, and for good reason. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Difficulty edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created in 2010 as a proposal that was swiftly rejected. Two transclusions. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Daytime-only radio edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:44, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions of this sprawling navbox that appears to be a giant parent category in navbox form. I don't see how this could be usable in article space. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Darken1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 May 19. Izno (talk) 20:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Darken edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 May 19. Izno (talk) 20:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dance or Die edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:48, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions of this navbox in article space. The body of the navbox contains only links to the main article and to one other band that is an WP:EGG violation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:03, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cyprus Astronomy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:26, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{Infobox organization}}. Replace with that template and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Congrats edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:49, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions (except in the creator's sandbox), documentation, incoming links, or categories. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:49, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Computer shortcuts edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions except for two demonstration/testing pages. These are shortcuts for a specific operating system that work only in some programs. The ones that have linked articles explain that the shortcuts can perform multiple functions, not just the ones listed here. This navbox appears to be unusable. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cancel edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Strikethrough. ✗plicit 06:52, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just three transclusions. I recommend merging this new template with the longstanding {{Strikethrough}}, adding this template's |color= parameter to the merge target. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_May_12&oldid=1089026665"