Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 March 29

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< March 28 March 30 >

March 29 edit

Template:Rfd2/header-notext edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub-templates from a failed proposed change to Template:Rfd2 from 2016 which was never worked on after. Gonnym (talk) 07:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Text Styles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:05, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. Created only 9 days ago, so if it is still a work in progress, this TFD gives the creator a week to get it working. If the creator wants to keep it, it can be userfied or recreated in their user space. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:09, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if creator doesn't update documentation Rlink2 (talk) 20:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ATK Mohun Bagan ISL debut season first match team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not sure where it could be used. If a location is found during this TfD then it should be subst there anyways. Gonnym (talk) 15:13, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's being used in the 2020-21 sub-part of ATK Mohun Bagan FC's History section Debankan talk  15:49, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:12, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep I oppose the decision to delete the template. The debut match in ISL for ATK Mohun Bagan was a milestone in their history, moreover it was against Kerala Blasters FC, who would soon become a part of a fierce rivalry. Therefore the line-up template forms a major part of the match's story. The template was unused because it wasn't incomplete for sometime, and as soon as it was completed, I used it in 2020–21 section of ATK Mohun Bagan's page. Debankan talk  08:48, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete the template is being used in one place, and that's the only place it'll ever be needed. Therefore, a template is not needed, so subst and delete it in that one article. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:29, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Triple-A East and West edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. No longer needed, because this league existed for only one year before Major League Baseball realized their error and returned to calling this league the International League. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Teahouse protected edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to Wikipedia:Teahouse/Banner/Teahouse protected notice. ✗plicit 14:09, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. It appears that this template previously appeared at the top of WP:Teahouse when the page was protected due to excessive vandalism (at least in 2018), but a search appears to indicate that the template is no longer used. If this is wrong, I will be happy to document where it is used. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:29, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/move to project space it could be useful if the page needs to be protected again for vandalism. Rlink2 (talk) 20:49, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to Wikipedia:Teahouse/Banner/Teahouse protected notice per Rlink2 -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 20:57, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to a subpage of Wikipedia:Teahouse. This was created during this discussion (that archive was a mess, because it transcluded both my sandbox and a subpage of Nick Moyes' userpage. I've pasted in the versions that were there at that time, so now the discussion is at least readable.). I don't think it's been necessary since, but it's definitely useful to keep around. --rchard2scout (talk) 08:53, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move per Rlink2. I agree this is not currently in use, nor has been for a while, but the levels of vandalism we can occasionally get at the Teahouse do merit this being kept in reserve, rather than having to reinvent the wheel, should problems ever occur again. Nick Moyes (talk) 10:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NewPages edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This appears to serve the same function as transcluding Special:NewPages, unless I am missing something. This template is probably not needed. Created about two months ago. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kabankalan Radio edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. No main article for this navbox. All of the linked articles are redirects to radio network articles, which have their own navboxes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't meet standard for templates. Rlink2 (talk) 20:45, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Messianic Feasts edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No main article for this navbox. None of the linked articles appear to be exclusive to this religious movement, so they are not connected in a way that is typical for a navbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:28, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Template:Jewish and Israeli holidays is the template that should be used for those articles. Gonnym (talk) 16:32, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That template is made for other reason and contain events with no messianic prophetic meaning like modern Israeli days unrelated to the Messianic Judaism. We also have two or three more events with translation into English that have also biblical names. FlorinCB (talk) 17:17, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Messianic Judaism is part of Judaism and all of the links in the nominated template, are located in the standard one. The translations are irrelevant. This is a navbox, not an article. Use only links. Gonnym (talk) 09:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We can include it to each article listed in the box. Interlink it to ro:Format:Sărbători mesianice. I made a private backup for my user page in case I will find some time in the summer. Thank You. FlorinCB (talk) 17:09, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
delete, I cleaned up the typos and bad markup, but as stated above, this is duplicating navigation found elsewhere. Frietjes (talk) 17:32, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
and reverted, apparently the owner doesn't want this navbox fixed (e.g., correct VTE links, functioning state parameter, ...). Frietjes (talk) 18:33, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If You can fix the markup create a User:Frietjes/Messianic Feasts since I could not see it working. FlorinCB (talk) 19:57, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
this now seems pointless since this is being deleted, but "feats" are not "feasts" and {{{Free days in Israel|state=collapsed}}} is not how the state parameter works. Frietjes (talk) 15:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This was not a joke it become so accidentally. FlorinCB (talk) 16:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Malta/Talkpagenote edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:29, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No need for documentation. Transuded onto Talk:Malta Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 19:23, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well if its transcluded, then what would be the need for the template to stay around @Pichemist? Rlink2 (talk) 20:45, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It seems redundant at that page, which already has a standard talk page note at the top explaining that "This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Malta article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject." – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:35, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • If kept, then generalize for any topic that has a noticeboard or wikiproject, so that this can be more than a single instance transclusion. (it would also need renaming) -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 21:32, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is not needed. It wasn't needed in the many years since WikiProjects were introduced and it still isn't needed now. Gonnym (talk) 23:15, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FH Maties edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created three months ago. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. If these simple links are needed, a single template in the style of {{Rugby union team}} (though not necessarily that complex) should be created instead of individual templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:48, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Rlink2 (talk) 20:46, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Medislast edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Only (dozens of) maintenance edits since creation in 2011. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2022 FIFA World Cup qualification – OFC First Round group tables edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unused template - OFC qualification was conducted in a neutral-site tournament ⇒ Chris0282 (talk) 17:03, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nepali Congress/meta/symbol edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 5. Izno (talk) 17:20, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PSButton edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted per G7. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created almost two months ago. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • yeah this should probably get deleted. originally was intented for playstation articles but I kinda just forgot about it. -> JLL9Tv (; t, c) 18:33, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jerry Lee Lewis' 9th toe: since you're the only major editor, you can request speedy deletion using WP:G7. Axem Titanium (talk) 16:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator and creator Rlink2 (talk) 20:46, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rejected Books of the Bibles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:08, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, or documentation. Created over a year ago. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WPPJ-BLP edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The only substantive edit was its creation in 2009. If it is wanted, it could be moved to project space as a subpage of the WikiProject. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:20, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete but notify members of the Wikiproject beforehand in case they want to move it into their space Rlink2 (talk) 20:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProjectWUSTLinvite edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Invitation for a project marked inactive since 2010. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:20, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clearly obselete Rlink2 (talk) 20:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The project is dead and as history has shown, very little chance to actually returning. Gonnym (talk) 09:08, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Yamatai footer edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 7. Izno (talk) 02:26, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Needdevanagari edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 7. Izno (talk) 02:26, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_March_29&oldid=1081373585"