Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 20

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 19 January 21 >

January 20 edit

Single-use weather box templates (S–Z) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:31, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

this is a follow-up to the December 24 discussion ... January 4 discussion. single-use weather box templates, per numerous prior discussions, these should be merged with the transcluding article and deleted. we have thousands of weatherboxes in thousands of articles, and the convention is that we put them in a separate template only when they are transcluded in more than one article. Frietjes (talk) 18:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Random box-header subpage edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused portal template. Gonnym (talk) 17:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Any portal-related template that isn't currently used will almost certainly never be used. Nigej (talk) 18:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NumberTools edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Every single function except for pi is redundant to some pre-existing functionality (usually the #expr parser function), and I don't see the value in a module to calculate pi to an arbitrarily large number of digits. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How about the number prefix? Anpang01 (talk) 01:24, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you mean the suffix function, then that's redundant to {{ordinal}}. I don't see any code involving prefixes in this module, so you'll have to be more specific if you mean something else. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, didn't know that existed. I just searched up like "number prefix" and it didn't appear, sorry. It can be deleted. Anpang01 (talk) 02:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ottoman Empire labelled map (1900) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or incoming links. Created in 2011. This should either be used or deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Realistically the only sensible place for it is at Vilayet where it used to be until 24 April 2021‎. That article has a list and a number of maps, which I assume people think is adequate. Nigej (talk) 17:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Monetary Policy Committee composition November 2013 – May 2014 and sibling templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Replaced by the much more sensible {{Monetary Policy Committee (United Kingdom)}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Linevert edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused character templates. Gonnym (talk) 10:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Devil May Cry Task Force edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I cleared out the 4ish pages here as this task force no longer exists, and even where it does/did it had relevant parameters in the relevant WikiProject (WP:VG). Izno (talk) 04:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This task force was merged with the main WP:VG back in 2015 and this template won't be required again.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikiblog disclaimer edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While I doubt this meets the intent of WP:NOTSOCIAL, this template has regardless not caught on with only some 3 uses. Izno (talk) 04:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MYL edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:28, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in two places, and I'm pretty sure we have a uw-civil series lying around already, for if/when civility is a concern (because bad words are not). Izno (talk) 04:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Maintained a barely used template, when other very similar ones exist, makes no sense. Nigej (talk) 07:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Diplomatic missions in Trinidad and Tobago edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template only links to 2 articles, one of which is actually on Japanese WP. So really only links to 1 article. There is not much value of having a template linking to one article. LibStar (talk) 03:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Republic of China Army edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and with only link and one redirect to an article about a division of the U.S. Military. Everything else is red. Clearly, no benefit here. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_January_20&oldid=1068433392"