Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 September 6

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< September 5 September 7 >

September 6 edit

Template:Beşiktaş JK 100th Year Champion Squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:22, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:CRUFT. We do not make navboxes for domestic league-winning squads. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 21:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - this is not a standard template in association football. GiantSnowman 18:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Govvy (talk) 19:13, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Colleges Under Hydrocarbons Education and Research Society edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:11, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All five fail the necessary amounts of links needed for a navbox. There is no navigational aid with these templates. The second template is majority text or red links. National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, and Colleges Under Hydrocarbons Education and Research Society remains unused. And the latter has no mainspace article. But also not every one of these schools needs a template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete none of them have enough bluelinks to actually aid navigation. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:48, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cephalonia div edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:12, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template is not used anymore, because the municipality of Cephalonia was disbanded in 2019. Markussep Talk 19:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wrestling template edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deletePer WP:NENAN. Five of them have less than 5 links to articles. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:57, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • More arguments. Per NENAN, at least 5 articles are required for a template. Vince's Devils and The Corre are two wrestling stables with less than 5 articles (Vince's 3 and Corre 4) BFG and MYC are tournaments with less than 5 articles (BFG 4 and MYC, 2). The title has two links. The Brood was a stable that lasted only one year and had 5 members (Gangrel, Jeff Hardy ,Matt Hardy, Edge and Christian). Not everything need a template and I think a template isn't necessary to see the stable members. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:New Britain Bees edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Does not aid navigation. User:Namiba 14:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Too small for a navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:27, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:27, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Now has sufficient links (what say you, @WikiCleanerMan: and @WilliamJE:?) Grutness...wha? 12:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment 3 of the links are still to the main article on the Bees or to categories(NAVBOX are supposed to link articles). So still delete....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It does not. Categories shouldn't be linked within the navbox and the adding of managers still make the navbox too small. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, connecting three articles is easily accomplished using "see also" links. Frietjes (talk) 15:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2008 Democratic presidential primaries delegate counts edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:38, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All these templates should be substituted where used. The 2020 US Democratic Party Automatic Delegates, 2020 Democratic Party primary results table, and 2020 Constitution Party primary results table are single-use. Tables like these shouldn't be on their own templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:05, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 12:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries was having page size issues, but I've dropped the size by 100kB through a page split, that template can be un-transcluded. I'm sure all the others were the same issue (or third-party fans following the crowd). User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 18:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1884 Western Maori general election edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:35, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Either used on two or three articles. Should be substituted where used since these will not require updating. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 12:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Substitute and delete Static and used in so few articles. Adabow (talk) 20:26, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1853 New Zealand general election edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:36, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All should be substituted where used. Most are on two articles with the exception of one. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:48, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 12:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Substitute and delete Static and used in so few articles. Adabow (talk) 20:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1993 New Zealand election edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:36, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All should be substituted where used. Same as the batch of templates nominated right below these. The very last template, 2020 New Zealand election, should be susbituted on the relevant election articles. And be removed from the Politics of New Zealand and NZ House of Representatives articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:20, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Make sure to use labelled section transclusion when substing, then, to keep them always in sync. Nixinova   T   C   23:30, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That can be done once this Tfd is closed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:50, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 12:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Substitute and delete Per nom. Adabow (talk) 20:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:New Zealand voting method referendum 2011 part A results edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Used only on three articles and should be substituted on there. One-off election referendum results using a table format that can be better off as part of the article than on its own template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:30, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 12:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Substitute and delete Per nom. Adabow (talk) 20:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Corfu div edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:21, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template is not used anymore, because the municipality of Corfu was disbanded in 2019. Markussep Talk 10:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Citation-attribution edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 September 14. Izno (talk) 22:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Central District current squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template is only used in one location so it should be moved there. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Substitute on the mainspace article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete not going to be used multiple times, so template not needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:49, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Multi-column numbered list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:07, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barely used and can be trivially replaced with {{div col}} and a wikitext ordered list in most places; where necessary, {{ordered list}} can be used for access to start. Izno (talk) 02:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_September_6&oldid=1099899756"