Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 May 30

May 30 edit

Template:Drapac riders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:14, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Team is defunct, so the template is no longer required. Craig(talk) 22:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of high schools in Manhattan edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. I have implemented Gonnym's suggestion. Any editor may copy the list to the list about the state and indeed partake in regular editing from there (though I don't suggest it in the interest of removing a duplication). Izno (talk) 20:29, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These templates are better off being displayed as a list on the List of high schools in New York and List of high schools in New York City articles rather than on separate templates. And the templates are superseded by the Template:Education in Brooklyn, Template:Education in Manhattan, Template:Education in Queens, Template:Education in Staten Island, and Template:Education in the Bronx navboxes where the list of high schools in the templates above are linked to the navigational templates. There's no need for separate templates for high schools in the five boroughs when they're included along with other types of schools and other educational institutions in the navboxes for each borough of New York City. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:04, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete. These templates should only appear in the List of high schools in New York City article. List of high schools in New York is way too long and completely unnecessary and should instead just link to the articles that are already created. --Gonnym (talk) 10:10, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete only being used in two places, one of which is questionable. FWIW, I agree with Gonnym on what to do there, but that should be sorted through the normal editing process and not at tfd. Regards, 31.41.45.190 (talk) 18:36, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I am being purely pragmatic, this sub-wiki is well thought out and probably the result of a lot of thinking. I suspect that trying to improve it would break something: something that I haven't the time or inclination to fix. I have had a look at List of high schools in New York and it is long- very long- I would have a look at our {{Hidden end}}{{hidden begin... syntax as it could lead to a better user experience- (but there is probably a policy somewhere!) ClemRutter (talk) 09:48, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SportsNet New York edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:30, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A local television network linked only to a few pages about their Mets-related programs. Even those pages might not be notable. The rest of the template is just plain text outside of the notable on-air personalities for the network. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:58, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I have proposed those run-of-the-mill tv shows for deletion. This navbox would then only be for on-air staff, which isn't necessary. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:36, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ColorToLum/nonLua edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:31, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Described as a "non-Lua version of {{ColorToLum}} to be used in large tables", but actually spends about six-to-ten times longer executing Lua code than the original and therefore has no benefit over the original. See Special:PermaLink/1025981290 versus Special:PermaLink/1025981783. Unused. User:GKFXtalk 18:17, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment User:Guarapiranga should consider contributing this to a source code repository instead of Wikipedia -- 67.70.27.180 (talk) 03:29, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Continental and regional labelled-map templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:32, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The parameters are confusing, it's hopelessly outdated, and is nearly unused. Painting17 (talk) 16:48, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WpEnergyPortal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:12, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Replaced the 3 uses with the standard {{portal}}. Izno (talk) 16:33, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Is italicized edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:11, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if was ever used, but currently it is unused and seems too specific for any general usage so unlikely to be used. Gonnym (talk) 14:38, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Memorial Tournament honorees edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 June 6. Izno (talk) 20:38, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Murtaza ali edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as WP:CSD#G7. plicit 13:24, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Improperly formed, and solely promotional. Philip Trueman (talk) 10:14, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).