Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 June 28

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< June 27 June 29 >

June 28 edit

Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:Citing sources edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus editnotice, does not actually match the way the talk page is used. Other indiscriminate applications of {{Wikipedia information pages talk page editnotice}} have been deleted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 October 12#Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:Wikidata, Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 November 10#Unnecessary Template:Wikipedia information pages talk page editnotice uses, Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 August 28#IPA help talk editnotices, Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 13#Template:Editnotices/Page/Help talk:IPA, and Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 26#Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment. This will need to be salted after deletion, to prevent it from being recreated by a bot. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AMAfF edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both are unused and serve no purpose. Useless in comparison to templates already dealing with the same subject. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of prisons in Rajasthan edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:41, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a useful navigation template - basically just duplicates List of prisons in Rajasthan. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:43, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Navigation template contains no links, and none of the referenced prisons has a Wikipedia article. Delete per nomination and WP:NAV. Johnnie Bob (talk) 19:03, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep 145 jails have been categorised and it is different from main wikipedia page. 40 open air camps jails may have different wikipedia pages and template can be used with them.I love to be honest (talk) 00:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No links. Just text. Very messy template. The article it was created for needs to be looked at as well. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:13, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and Johnnie Bob. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 02:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Speedy keep this is how a creative efforts are erased. Template contains information about 145 jails and there is debate for List of prisons in Rajasthan and it's result is to keep the page.I love to be honest (talk) 17:03, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I love to be honest, I've stricken your second speedy keep because you only get one vote. One vote per person and no the article you created hasn't resulted in keep. The debate is ongoing. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:50, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Country data New Zealand Cricket Team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:43, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flag is non-free and should therefore not be used simply for decoration. Also this just doesn't make sense - "New Zealand Cricket Team" is not in any way a governmental jurisdiction. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:42, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Windows 11 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 02:45, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary sidebar, all the links redirect back to Windows 11. Maybe in the future, this can be used like {{Windows 10}} but no need for it for probably a few years. — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 18:09, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep intuitively "probably in a few years" seems right, but looking at a few of the links, they don't redirect ("all the links redirect" isn't true...) - the links show essential data/info for the uninformed reader. (i): agent (5) (ii): autonomous - (version: prototype) (talk) 23:50, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the reasons stated by Autonomous agent 5. Itsquietuptown t • c 01:15, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep there's no reason for this template to be deleted; as the article gets larger, more things will be moved to their own page, so the deletion of this template will just make things a lot more cumbersome to manage, and the template will eventually just be recreated anyways. It should also be kept per the reasons laid out by Autonomous agent 5. Also, the "unnecessary for probably a few years" remark is more than likely highly untrue. - Kamran Mackey (talk to me · my contributions) 02:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as Features new to Windows 11 now has its own article. There's no reason to delete the template as per the reasons Autonomous agent 5 also laid out. Giorgos456 (talk) 16:43, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spotify Greenroom edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:46, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No reason for this at basename - {{Latest stable software release/Spotify Greenroom}} is the proper location (which also exists, so this needs to be deleted, not moved). {{Spotify Greenroom}}, if it existed, should be a navigation template for the software, not its latest version. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:09, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AIR music awards edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:47, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No navigational purpose as there is already a template for the AIR Awards. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:55, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ADFC ranks and insignia templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:48, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a template that links to other templates hence the plural of template at the end. Rather it just links to the article about cadets of the Australian Army, Navy, and Air Force. But it's useless as there already exists a template for the cadets of the three divisions of the Australian military. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AD+PD/meta/shortname edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:49, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and the party name is already short as it is a combination of the Democratic Alternative and the Democratic Party of Malta. It was probably created as a test. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:43, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I'm pretty sure this isn't a test, but regardless it's unused, and should be deleted for that reason. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AGPL edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:50, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A copy of AGPL from Commons. This remains unused and is superseded by Template:GPL which covers Version 2 and later versions of the Free Software Foundation including Version 3 which this template was created for. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AN3 report edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 02:50, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a legitimate template used by Twinkle. Just a copy of a section on Wikipedia edit-warring noticeboard. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:32, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep What makes you think that? I'm pretty sure this is, in fact, used by Twinkle. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    It's an unused template. If anybody edits the template, the header changes to "User:[] reported by WikiCleanerMan" as in the case from when I edited it to add the Tfd notice. Aside from that, why should this be used when there is a way for you to create a new report on the edit-warring noticeboard? It could have been used by Twinkle, but what for? It just copies the sections of the reports from the edit-warring noticeboard. Templates using Twinkle are used often on Wikipedia. This doesn't fall into that category. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    This template is meant to be substituted to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, so it being unused is irrelevant and being a copy of the format of that noticeboard is deliberate. And it would be entirely reasonable for Twinkle to subst a template that isn't used by any other process. You still aren't providing any valid evidence for your claim that it isn't legitimate. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:20, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Meant to be. But isn't going to be. Subst wouldn't be an option when the ability to create a new report is available on the noticeboard mainspace. It's illegitimate because it from what I found, no Twinkle function could be used with this template. For warning users, it's AN3, not this. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @WikiCleanerMan: If you go to a given user or user talk page and select "ARV" from the "TW" dropdown, and then "Edit warring (WP:AN3)" from "Select report type", there's an AN3 report form. Judging from this line of code, everything you put into that box is then put into {{subst:AN3 report}} to be posted. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 05:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep because it does indeed appear to be used by Twinkle (per Pppery & Tamzin). Tol | talk | contribs 23:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Simpsons (season 33) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:51, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a template Gonnym (talk) 12:34, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nav book tool edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 July 6. Izno (talk) 02:52, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_June_28&oldid=1032206665"