Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 8

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 7 December 9 >

December 8 edit

Template:Afghanistan national football team results edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused following page merges, see Afghanistan national football team results. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 23:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ATC code C02 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 16. ✗plicit 01:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Chile winners in the Big Four pageants edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 16. ✗plicit 01:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Canada winners in the Big Four pageants edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 16. ✗plicit 01:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lists of music by Ferruccio Busoni edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

redundant navigation to Template:Ferruccio Busoni. the nice thing about using the footer/navbox for navigation is that it leaves more room for right-floating content like images, infoboxes, etc. Frietjes (talk) 21:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sorell LGA InteractiveMap and related Australia LGA map templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. These map templates have been replaced in relevant articles by calls to map data stored in individual subpages. For example, {{Sorell LGA InteractiveMap}} has been replaced in Sorell Council by a call to Wikipedia:Map data/Australian LGAs/Tasmania/Sorell. As such, these LGA map templates are no longer used and have no prospect of future use. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jonesey95, I think you forgot to add Template:Circular Head LGA InteractiveMap, Template:George Town LGA InteractiveMap, and Template:Meander Valley LGA InteractiveMap to the batch when you merged the nominations. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:30, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strange. Something went wrong with my text sorting. Fixed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Unrelated to the nom but to the example given, shouldn't pages like Wikipedia:Map data/Australian LGAs/Tasmania/Sorell be changed in the content model to json (after moving the doc to the /doc)? Is there any issue which would prevent doing that? Gonnym (talk) 10:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Waterbodies of Connecticut edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to have been replaced by better templates, including {{Coastal waterbodies of Connecticut}} and {{Connecticut River}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Weeks of Ordinary Time edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiBlame edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. Does not appear to be a subst only template either. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FAC2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia talk:Featured article review#Worth giving a periodic check?, this is unused and has been obsolete for years. Hog Farm Talk 16:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Just like the templates associated with Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 November 24#Category:Wikipedia featured article review candidates (closed) and Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 December 1#Category:Wikipedia featured article removal candidates, this is another template that is no longer needed, since Template:Article history was developed in 2008. See Taming talk page clutter and User:Maralia/FA templates (Maralia helped enormously in the effort when User:Gimmetrow and I built the Article milestones on Every Single FA). This particular one was created in 2005 by an editor who didn't really understand how the FAC templates should work, before we had frequent multiple nominations, and was trying to set up a second FAC nomination for the same article; it has never been widely used. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox time zone/old edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:56, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is no longer in use!! Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 11:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 15:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The information is in the revision history. Gonnym (talk) 09:44, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:STV Election box candidate2 with custom party edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 16. ✗plicit 01:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:State establishment decade-only century category edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:56, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused category navigation template. Gonnym (talk) 14:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SeismicStructNavTemplate edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused faux-navigation template. Gonnym (talk) 14:43, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Reversi diagram edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused other than in 1 sandbox and 1 talk page and duplicates the in use Template:Reversi. Gonnym (talk) 14:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mancala 2x5 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above Mancala templates are all unused. The holes were replaced with a single Template:Mancala hole. Gonnym (talk) 14:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Good idea. I tidied up the merge target template and added some documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bowling-Stepladder edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused tournament bracket template. Gonnym (talk) 13:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Republic of China presidential elections edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Izno (talk) 23:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template was created today, but all the information it contains is already in either Template:Chinese elections (1912–49) or Template:Taiwanese elections. In general, I believe we treat the pre-1949 ROC government as a different entity from the modern government of Taiwan, and I don't see the value of a unified template which is on all the same articles as the above two templates.  — Amakuru (talk) 11:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Amakuru: The elections during 1949 and 1991 were not included in either template, and was created as they were indirect election which is a situation similar to Germany presidential elections. Two separate templates were created for German case. Cypp0847 (talk) 12:27, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • For reference: Template:German elections, Template:German presidential elections. Cypp0847 (talk) 13:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete All links are already on the two templates. We don't need a third and any election article that isn't featured on either one should be added. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The elections during 1949 and 1991 were not included in either template as mentioned just above, and it is seemingly that indirect elections not adding to election template is a consensus on the Template:Taiwanese elections, as demonstrated in the aforementioned German example. Cypp0847 (talk) 17:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 12:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cleanup list sort edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Unsorted list. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unclear usage ("sorted" how?) Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:51, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:34, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as redundant to {{Alphabetize}} or {{MOSLOW}}, depending on the situation. Both of those templates probably need better names, BTW. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment if the list is unorganized, any sort of systematic sorting could be intended, and thus suitable. Add a parameter to indicate what kind of sort is desired will fix the ambiguity problem, but it should be workable without one, since the cleanup editor can decide on a sort method (such as datesort) -- 22:29, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Probably keep and rename to {{unsorted list}}, and then merge in the other couple of templates. We don't fundamentally care how a list is sorted, but it is valid to call out that a list is indeed unsorted. --Izno (talk) 05:45, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unused and merge the other two per Izno. Gonnym (talk) 11:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting and tagging the other two templates for merge since the prevailing consensus currently seems to be to merge all of these into one "unsorted list" template.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There are two motions emerging here; one for outright deletion and one for merging the three separate templates into one motion. In order to make that clearer, I have added in the other two templates to this nom.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 11:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_8&oldid=1060836456"