Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 30

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 29 December 31 >

December 30 edit

Template:Dhanaulti District edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The template is not used and has no likelihood of being used. Certes (talk) 21:47, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Isn't there a speedy delete for stuff like this. Nigej (talk) 13:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I thought so, and there ought to be, but it doesn't seem to fall within any CSD. Please feel free to find one! Certes (talk) 15:09, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Delfont Mackintosh edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:07, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template completely duplicates Template:Theatres in London, as per WP:DEL-REASON #10. All nine article links in this template are listed in one row of the Theatres in London template. Epicgenius (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Having both in articles like Gielgud Theatre doesn't help navigation, it's is just confusing for our readers. One or the other, and Theatres in London seems preferable. Nigej (talk) 13:48, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Quran-audio edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:31, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template where it displays a link to Quran audio but it also states it's for the infobox, Template:Infobox surah, but there is no audio file as part of the template. Surah Infobox provides English translation of Quran chapters but no audio format. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment is this supposed to be an external link template? Per the documentation, it seems to suggest it should link to freequranmp3.com/ghamdi/###.mp3 -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:32, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, the |audio= parameter in {{Infobox surah}} provides an option to add audio, by way of linking to an uploaded file. Regarding {{Quran-audio}}: while freequranmp3.com implies to have no copyright ("© Nobody"), I highly doubt that all reciters listed on https://freequranmp3.com/ have given their permission for such copyright-free publication and that the website is violating their copyright. I'd thus vouch for delete per WP:ELNEVER#1. --HyperGaruda (talk) 08:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IstZahl edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 January 6. Izno (talk) 19:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AirTrain color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused rail template. FYI Gonnym. BLAIXX 16:30, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 16:49, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no longer used. – Epicgenius (talk) 20:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Translation/Preload edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 11:41, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As it is, the template is not used. Q28 (talk) 11:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is used as a preload template on about 60 pages. They are marked as historical so no objection to deletion but they should have the template removed from the forms if it is deleted. User:GKFXtalk 23:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Was only nominated for deletion because of a misunderstanding of its purpose. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Transportation geography graphical timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Transportation geography graphical timeline is never going to be linear especially with different modes and events overlap. Darrelljon (talk) 11:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Only used in Transport geography. Content seems unsuitable for that article anyway, since it primarily relates to technology. Template is also a mess, with much overlapping content. Maybe that aspect could be improved but not worth the effort IMO. Nigej (talk) 11:35, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Compatibility Table for HAZMAT Class 1 Materials edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:37, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above templates are tables that are each used in one article. As this is regular article content, it should be subst into their articles and deleted. Gonnym (talk) 10:20, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst/delete per nom. Single use article content. Nigej (talk) 10:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst/delete Having created one of the templates under consideration, I can't foresee a use for the tables across multiple articles. This seems pretty logical.--The Navigators (talk) 22:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree with proposal since the author, The Navigators, supports, and merging will likely simplify. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:41, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Party shading/Latvian Way edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:12, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Latvia political party shading templates. Gonnym (talk) 10:08, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Party shading/INC edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:14, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused India political party shading templates. Gonnym (talk) 10:03, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Greek Party shading key edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:16, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in one talk page. Should be subst there and deleted. --Gonnym (talk) 10:01, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Party shading/English Party (Greece) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:16, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Greece political party shading templates. Gonnym (talk) 09:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Party shading/Colombian conservatives edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:17, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Colombia political party shading templates. Gonnym (talk) 09:47, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Luigi topicon edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 04:58, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation. This template was created by an editor who ended up causing a ton of trouble (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CentralTime301/Archive and their user talk page history) and is now blocked for sockpuppetry that began around the time of this template's creation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:33, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused. and pointless too. Nigej (talk) 07:54, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 14:05, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DYK user expanded topicon large edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 04:58, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. Redundant to {{DYK user topicon}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:23, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Youth Lightning World Championship medallists edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:20, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used in one article. Article content that should be substed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 10:22, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Masters Lightning World Championship medallists edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. There is only one incoming link from non-talk space, a cross-namespace link from this article. This is article content in template space. It could be moved to an article, but there is not currently an appropriate article for it. The closest articles are probably World championships in sailing and List of World Championships medalists in sailing (centreboard classes). – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Map of Bushehr Province edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 04:57, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. There are better maps in use at Bushehr Province. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Better maps available. Nigej (talk) 08:11, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HazmatClass edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The template is no longer in use. oh! Q28 (talk) 02:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The Hazmat family of templates seems to have been made unused with the removal of the |EU_class= from {{Chembox}}. Gonnym (talk) 10:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Speedway race format - t5 r5 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not going to be used, okay? Q28 (talk) 02:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused for 13 years. Nigej (talk) 08:12, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Speedway race format - t4 r4+1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, the template is not used. Q28 (talk) 02:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused for 13 years. Nigej (talk) 08:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Missing articles in category edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 January 6. Izno (talk) 02:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SH edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now the template is no longer in use. Q28 (talk) 02:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete letters should be typed directly rather than using templates, as discussed at TfD / December 23 # Beta letter. User:GKFXtalk 14:08, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CanLeg1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, the template is no longer used, thank you. Q28 (talk) 02:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused. Presumably relates to Canadian Legislature. Nigej (talk) 08:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Colort/end edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:22, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The template is no longer in use, because it has been substed. Q28 (talk) 02:07, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't think this was subst at all, but rather just never used. It's not categorized, it has no documentation and it has no incoming links from the parent template. It also isn't part of a grouping of "begin and end" templates. In this case there is not even a need for a redirect. Gonnym (talk) 10:12, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:64TeamAnd32TeamX2RoundBracket edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But the template is not used. Q28 (talk) 02:04, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • DeIete as unused. I recently changed a number of articles to use alternatives. Nigej (talk) 07:33, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unused. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:03, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:64TeamAnd32TeamBracket-NoSeeds-Byes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A single template is not used. Q28 (talk) 02:04, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • DeIete as unused. I recently changed a number of articles to use alternatives. Nigej (talk) 07:34, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unused. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:03, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:32Team-2Round-NoSeeds-Byes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:20, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We understand that the template is not used. Q28 (talk) 02:03, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • DeIete as unused. I recently changed a number of articles to use alternatives. Nigej (talk) 07:34, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unused. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:03, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_30&oldid=1064172335"