Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 10

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 9 December 11 >

December 10 edit

Template:Sunderland AFC graphical timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused graph timeline for the football team. Not needed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hot Place graphical timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 17. Izno (talk) 23:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cambrian Series 2 graphical timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 17. Izno (talk) 23:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UAAP color cell edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete UAAP color cell as redundant to Module:College color. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:UAAP color cell with Template:NCAA color cell and Template:NCAA secondary color cell.
{{UAAP color cell}} and {{NCAA color cell}} use {{#invoke:College color|header1}} and are used for college color cells. The UAAP color template also has an |alt= parameter which changes the header1 function to {{#invoke:College color|header2}}. Template:NCAA secondary color cell is used for its header2. Additionally, UAAP has redirect names in the template, which if needed, should be migrated over to Module:College color/data. {{UAAP color cell}} usages should be split into those two templates. The merged template name should be Template:College color cell and Template:College secondary color cell to match the module and to keep it more neutral. Gonnym (talk) 20:26, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I don't really have a strong opinion on this one, but it is shorter to type {{UAAP color cell|DLS}} vs. {{NCAA color cell|De La Salle Green Archers}} we could make "DLS" an alias for "De La Salle Green Archers" but I don't know if there are other schools that could claim DLS as an abbreviation (or ADU, ADM, FEU, NUI, UEA, ...) this would certainly be problematic for "NU" (Northwestern University). in any event, the best way to replace these is to use the "College" series like this. Frietjes (talk) 15:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • delete the UAAP template, upon further inspection it looks like most of the transclusions were from a few templates, and mostly for UST, so we should replace these and delete the template. Frietjes (talk) 16:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UAAP color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete UAAP color as redundant to Module:College color. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:UAAP color with Template:NCAA color.
Both templates use {{#invoke:College color|color}} and are used for college colors. The UAAP color template has redirect names in the template, which if needed, should be migrated over to Module:College color/data. The merged template name should be Template:College color to match the module and to keep it more neutral. Gonnym (talk) 20:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I don't really have a strong opinion on this one, but it is shorter to type {{UAAP color|DLS}} vs. {{NCAA color|De La Salle Green Archers}} we could make "DLS" an alias for "De La Salle Green Archers" but I don't know if there are other schools that could claim DLS as an abbreviation (or ADU, ADM, FEU, NUI, UEA, ...) this would certainly be problematic for "NU" (Northwestern University). Frietjes (talk) 15:25, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • delete the UAAP template, upon further inspection it looks like most of the transclusions were from a few templates, and mostly for UST, so we should replace these and delete the template. Frietjes (talk) 16:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Upsetting edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Not usable per the guideline at Wikipedia:No disclaimers. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:42, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Danish Minister list top edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Danish government table templates. Gonnym (talk) 17:33, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:B03, B05, B06 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Merged history with Template:Antianemic preparations (noting that the other templates are Template:Blood substitutes and perfusion solutions and Template:Other hematological agents) Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Completely unnecessary and unconventional way of providing attribution. Histmerge into one of the templates it was split into and delete. Gonnym (talk) 17:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SS Seasons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a template but an article but also List of Summer Series seasons already exists. Gonnym (talk) 17:24, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:STE color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and already converted to Module:Adjacent stations/STE. Gonnym (talk) 17:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CZ-ZL edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:14, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Not a subdivision template for the Czech Republic despite being categorized as such. It contains nothing but the flag of the city of Zlín and a link to the article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CSSoutline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:14, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and the page comes off as blank. Nothing much of use here. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:48, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused (it comes across as blank because it's a template that renders given text in a certain format, and the template itself has no text to render). * Pppery * it has begun... 20:55, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CDU/CSU presidential candidates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 17. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:14, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020 Summer Paralympics men's sitting volleyball group A standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template is unused as Sitting volleyball at the 2020 Summer Paralympics – Men's tournament#Pool A uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 12:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020 Summer Paralympics men's sitting volleyball game B1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above are all unused as Sitting volleyball at the 2020 Summer Paralympics – Men's tournament#Pool B uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 11:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Type your message edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used since 2011. Q28 (talk) 10:45, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:55, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. We have enough variants of this template already. No need to keep the ones that haven't been used in a decade. — voidxor 21:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment what are the other variants of the inputbox template? -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 13:35, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Userbox/TFiOS and similar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 17. ✗plicit 12:10, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Userbox/User tries kind/alt1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MIG resulting in the template not being used, but lacking an administrator to delete. Q28 (talk) 10:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, as there is a transclusion. I may change my !vote if Pppery can explain the purpose of that page and the custom module that it invokes. It appears to be some sort of maintenance list but I want to confirm that before supporting deletion. — voidxor 20:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Ignore User:Pppery/noinclude list when determining whether a page is unused. It, due to various technical esoterica, counts as transcluding all pages at TfD and the transclusion will disappear as soon as it's no longer at TfD. (The function of the page is a maintenance list of pages at TfD that aren't properly tagged) While I'm here, Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:55, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete. Changing my vote now that I have an explanation and am confident that it's not going to cause trouble. — voidxor 21:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Userbox/User tries kind edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 12:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MIG resulting in the template not being used, but lacking an administrator to delete. Q28 (talk) 10:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, as there are two transclusions. In one, Pppery needs to explain the purpose of that page and the custom module that it invokes. The other I had fixed a year ago but was reverted four days ago; Eliskuya2 may have thought that I had vandalized his page. That happens occasionally, but my edit summaries have improved since. Also, the nom needs to be less overzealous and actually check that these have no transclusions. — voidxor 20:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    You should ignore User:Pppery/noinclude list when determining whether a page is unused. It, due to various technical esoterica, counts as transcluding all pages at TfD and the transclusion will disappear as soon as it's no longer at TfD. While I'm here, Keep per voidxor. I believe that Q28 thought it was unused because they were reading off an old database report that hadn't been updated since the user reverted your migration. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:55, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Pings don't work unless you post an entirely new comment, so reping Eliskuya2 * Pppery * it has begun... 21:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Space 2019/POTD/July 21 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 09:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used. Looks like it was created in error. Q28 (talk) 09:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Val/delimitnum edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 09:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A leftover of the old Template:Val which needed sub-templates. Template:Val#Arguments explains that the template handles this with |fmt= available to change it. Usages should be replaced with Val directly. Gonnym (talk) 09:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Val/+- edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 09:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub-templates of Template:Val (other than a talk page usage or two). Gonnym (talk) 09:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rndgaps edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 09:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. {{Val|{{Round}}}} does the same thing:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Orders of magnitude (length) imagemap human-scale edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 09:22, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Used only at List of examples of lengths should be subst and deleted Gonnym (talk) 08:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UNC-TV DTV edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 09:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are no articles to use this template because PBS North Carolina covers all the relevant transmitters. Created by a blocked user. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 08:16, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Meredith Corporation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 06:44, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Company was recently sold into Dotdash with the television stations sold to Gray Television. The entries are on Template:IAC and Template:Gray TV. CrazyC83 (talk) 06:41, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Soviet King/Wdefcon edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 06:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to have been created in the wrong namespace. Category:Wdefcon templates are typically created in User space as User subpages. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:24, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:VimbLatestVersion edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 06:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. No documentation, so no indication of what article this might have been useful in. Many software version templates have been replaced by local information, since they are typically useful in only one article. This hasn't had any edits in two years, so it appears to be abandoned. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hbrshva and three other unused Niqqud templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. See this November 15 TFD for details. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:48, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should probably nominate the complete set then (Category:Niqqud templates) as they are all only used at User:Gilgamesh~enwiki/Naming conventions (Hebrew). Gonnym (talk) 06:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I checked one at random, {{Hbrseggol}}, and it has a transclusion in an unrelated User page. I'd like to hear the opinion of Gilgamesh~enwiki about whether these templates should simply be substed and then nominated for deletion as a batch (or we can have a TFD and then subst and delete them if that is the consensus outcome). – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:50, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonnym: I completely forgot that page existed.
@Jonesey95: As the originator of these templates, I do not contest any consensus made here. - Gilgamesh (talk) 01:18, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the unused templates (AKA the ones nominated here) per nom, regardless of whether the used ones should be substed and deleted. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:55, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ICD-11 MMS and related templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICD-10 Chapter I: Certain infectious and parasitic diseases for the reason that these templates, which were used only with those pages, are no longer useful and should be deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:39, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_10&oldid=1060835950"