Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 January 20

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 19 January 21 >

January 20 edit

Template:Triglia F.C. edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NENAN's "rule of five", this has not enough links.

Apart from the head article Triglia F.C., two only other navigable (i.e blue) link is to a subsection of that page: Triglia F.C.#History. There is also an external link.

That makes the navbox pointless: a link to the head article would be just as helpful to the reader, and a lot less bulky. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as clutter. The second article can be accessed from the main article easily enough. J947 (c), at 23:21, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:O.F. Ierapetra F.C. edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NENAN's "rule of five", this has not enough links.

Apart from the head article O.F. Ierapetra F.C., two only other navigable (i.e blue) link is to a subsection of that page: O.F. Ierapetra F.C.#History. There is also an external link.

That makes the navbox pointless: a link to the head article would be just as helpful to the reader, and a lot less bulky BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:07, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as clutter. The second article can be accessed from the main article easily enough. J947 (c), at 23:20, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Panarkadikos F.C. edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:45, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NENAN's "rule of five", this has not enough links.

Apart from the head article Panarkadikos F.C., two only other navigable (i.e blue) link is to a subsection of that page: Panarkadikos F.C.#History. There is also an external link.

That makes the navbox pointless: a link to the head article would be just as helpful to the reader, and a lot less bulky. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as clutter. J947 (c), at 23:21, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Thesprotos F.C. edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:46, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NENAN's "rule of five", this has not enough links.

Apart from the head article Thesprotos F.C., two only other navigable (i.e blue) link is to a subsection of that page: Thesprotos F.C.#History. There is also an external link.

That makes the navbox pointless: a link to the head article would be just as helpful to the reader, and a lot less bulky. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:57, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom and horrid white text on bright yellow colour scheme. This is a navbox for one, eponymous article. There's no need for this.   Thank you to nom for bringing this forward. --Doug Mehus T·C 21:16, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as clutter. The second article can be accessed from the main article easily enough. J947 (c), at 23:16, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Eurovision Asia Song Contest edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:47, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to navigate, no links to articles that are actually about the Eurovision Asia Song Contest, only tangentially-related topics. dummelaksen (talk) 15:45, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. We can revisit this if the contest eventually takes place. Grk1011 (talk) 16:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom; useless. J947 (c), at 23:20, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PATHServices edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:48, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template is redudant to the {{PATH (rail system)}} navbox, which already includes the same 6 links. All the articles using this nominated template also include the navbox. –Dream out loud (talk) 10:57, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I think it's a remnant from before the full navbox was created. It's unneeded now. oknazevad (talk) 16:25, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Redundant relic. Cards84664 (talk) 21:26, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fostiras F.C. edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 10:41, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN: not enough links.

Apart from the head article Fostiras F.C. and a section of it (Fostiras F.C.#History), there only 2 navigable (blue) links: Category:Fostiras F.C. players and Tavros Stadium. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom and horrid white text on bright yellow colour scheme. This is a navbox for a mere two articles. There's no need for this.   Thank you to nom for bringing this forward. --Doug Mehus T·C 21:18, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GAS Ialysos 1948 F.C. edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 10:40, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN: not enough links.

The only navigable (blue) links are to the head article GAS Ialysos 1948 F.C., to Category:GAS Ialysos 1948 F.C. players and to a section of the head article: GAS Ialysos 1948 F.C.#History . BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:07, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, though the yellow on red McDonald's colour scheme is a slight improvement. This is a navbox for a mere two articles. There's no need for this.   Thank you to nom for bringing this forward. --Doug Mehus T·C 21:19, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Faktaruta militärperson edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 10:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Four reasons: 1) it's a BLP infobox, not a template. It's not even a stub. 2) I can find nothing to indicate their notability 3) The creator's username seems to indicate they are writing about themselves. 4) Parts of it aren't even in English. The title's Swedish for 'military person facts box", and it appears to have originally been entirely in Swedish. - Sumanuil (talk) 04:31, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete - serves no purpose, would appear to be a user just getting a bit confused while creating their user page. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 14:57, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:R from meme edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 February 2. Primefac (talk) 03:03, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_January_20&oldid=938743805"