Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 December 24

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 23 December 25 >

December 24 edit

Template:IRC NQNS edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 January 1. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Eric Tessmer edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:10, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As none of the listed albums have articles, this navbox provides no navigational benefit. WP:NENAN. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:49, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, insufficient navigational benefit. Frietjes (talk) 21:24, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep This is an album listing. 5 albums so far. Album articles will be created. Lightburst (talk) 02:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Only link is to the subject themselves. A NAVBOX without links serves no purpose....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:15, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Guy King edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:10, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Guy King Has an article for only one album. The Navbox offers no improvement over current navigational options. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:19, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, insufficient navigational benefit. Frietjes (talk) 21:25, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep 4 albums for this artist. Album articles will be created. Lightburst (talk) 02:48, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CD lines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:11, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Czech Republic rail templates. Gonnym (talk) 16:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Battlestar Galactica vehicles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:10, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only two articles remaining, no need for a template. TTN (talk) 15:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, insufficient navigational benefit. Frietjes (talk) 21:25, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Andrew Heywood edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:10, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused citation(?) template. Gonnym (talk) 15:47, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, appear to have been created by mistake. Frietjes (talk) 21:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFR color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Alishan Forest Railway templates. Probably replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Alishan Forest Railway. Gonnym (talk) 15:39, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2019 CEBL season by team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:15, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as all team are red links. Navigates to nothing. Gonnym (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per above. I do not believe those pages are likely to be created either. BLAIXX 16:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, insufficient navigational benefit. Frietjes (talk) 21:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete A NAVBOX without links serves no purpose....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:19, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2010 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:15, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; replaced on pages by {{2010 FIFA World Cup qualification}}. Gonnym (talk) 15:30, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 16:08, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:What Is This? edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:58, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly navigates anything ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 00:20, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_December_24&oldid=933490952"