Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 May 6

May 6 edit

Module:DisplayLuaTableContents edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Userfied. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 03:17, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to Module:Dump {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 23:57, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pppery: This module dates back to the first days of Scribunto and I haven't used it much since, and it doesn't seem to have any substantive use at the moment anywhere outside of archives. However, I'm reluctant to have code put out of sight in the admin-only bin, not just in this case but as an overall rule. Would it be possible for us to agree to simply move the page to Module:User:Wnt/Sandbox/DisplayLuaTableContents, under my existing sandboxes? Someday I mean to refresh my Lua writing but something always seems to come up. (usually bad, nowadays...) Wnt (talk) 01:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but to Module:Sandbox/Wnt/DisplayLuaTableContents as that is the convention for test lua modules. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 01:36, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. My Module:User:Wnt/Sandbox predates this standard, so I should probably move it. ;) OK, I've moved it and the other sandbox subpages (now Module:Sandbox/Wnt etc). Probably broke some old code in the box but if it matters I can figure it out someday. I'll move this TfD item the same way if it's OK, but because this discussion is open I thought I should ask first.
That is fine with me. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 02:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK then -- I just moved this. Barring any third party objection I think this is resolved. Wnt (talk) 02:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Definition list 2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:06, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Used only on one article and doesn't do anything that can't be done just as well by basic Wikitext without any template. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 23:48, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Description doesn't do anything that can't be done just as well by basic Wikitext without any template is however untrue: the margin of the <dd> is 0 in this template. Which I generally don't support as it is inconsistent with user expectation. --Izno (talk) 13:49, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox dot-in company edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:17, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unclear intent. MB 20:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete -- Looks like an aborted article in template space. It might even reasonably be a test article and CSDable as such, but I won't mark it up since it would be an edge case. --Izno (talk) 13:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).