Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 June 20

June 20 edit

Template:Infobox California legislation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 1. Primefac (talk) 02:49, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Splatoon edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 23:54, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Navigates an insufficient number of topics to need its own navbox. Izno (talk) 16:36, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I was about to nominate this template for deletion myself when I spotted the navbox. Pokajanje (talk) 02:07, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - only two directly related articles, and two tangential ones. Not enough to warrant it. Sergecross73 msg me 02:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and per Sergecross73. Only two valid links, which isn't enough to warrant a navbox. --woodensuperman 11:57, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and Sergecross73. Dreamy Jazz talk | contribs 12:38, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RFLargestMetros edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 23:54, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Links two articles. Not useful navigation. --woodensuperman 10:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:APN News & Media edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 23:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, the company is no longer named APN News & Media, it has rebranded to HT&E. But while a simple page move and rename would ordinarily be in order, the company has also sold most of the assets listed in the template (it no longer owns Australian newspapers or any New Zealand assets). With those removed, the template would only be left with the "Australian radio" section, which calls "Template:Australian Radio Network" anyway. Therefore, there's no longer any purpose for this template. -- Whats new?(talk) 06:44, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Under these circumstances the template is now wholly redundant, because once all the changes are applied it will just be a wrapper for another navbox with no other purpose. Bearcat (talk) 16:04, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, no longer useful. Frietjes (talk) 16:03, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete due to company changes. --Shortride (talk) 03:31, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

WWII British AFVs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 1. Primefac (talk) 02:48, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Linguistics Facebook edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete for now, will userfy if requested. Primefac (talk) 23:53, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of the scope of the Template namespace. Most of the links direct to a page in the User namespace or on Facebook. Delete or move to User:Учхљёная/Template:Linguistics Facebook per WP:USERFY. Nardog (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).