Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 June 18

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< June 17 June 19 >

June 18 edit

Condense federal court infoboxes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox United States federal court. Primefac (talk) 23:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox U.S. district court, Template:Infobox U.S. court of appeals, Template:Infobox U.S. territorial court and Template:Infobox U.S. federal court.
I propose merging {{Infobox U.S. district court}}, {{Infobox U.S. court of appeals}}, {{Infobox U.S. territorial court}}, and {{Infobox U.S. federal court}} into {{Infobox United States federal court}}. There is little reason to have separate infoboxes for each of these, since many of the parameters are the same and the subjects of the associated articles are very similar. I have created a new template called Infobox United States federal court, which operates in much the same way as {{Infobox officeholder}}, in which the appropriate parameters will be available for use based on the type of court the editor enters in an initial parameter. E.g. in a parameter called court_type, an editor can enter district, which will permit the display of the parameter appeals_to. Ergo Sum 16:45, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support I created the territorial court and federal court templates because I thought that they were needed. I am not that skilled in coding, so the first solution that I thought of (which involved merging all of the infoboxes) was not a possibility. Ergo Sum (talk · contribs) obviously seems to know what he's doing, so I fully support the merger. – JocularJellyfish TalkContribs 15:31, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Per nominator and JocularJellyfish. Safiel (talk) 20:03, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support: per nominator, JocularJellyfish. So long as you can merge them all together correctly, I won't object, Ergo Sum. —Javert2113 (Siarad.|¤) 01:14, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nominator and JocularJellyfish. This will make things less tedious. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  04:14, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Adminstats/SewerCat edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete by 28bytes (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 14:05, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused, maybe G6 Hhkohh (talk) 13:08, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Adminstats/Auric edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete by 28bytes (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 14:05, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused, maybe G6 Hhkohh (talk) 12:17, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Adminstats/Mukti Subedi-Wiki edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete by 28bytes (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 14:05, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused, maybe G6 Hhkohh (talk) 12:13, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Adminstats/There'sNoTime edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete by 28bytes (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 14:05, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused, maybe G6 Hhkohh (talk) 12:05, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Adminstats/Wiki-Coffee edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete by 28bytes (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 14:05, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused, maybe G6 Hhkohh (talk) 11:50, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Adminstats/Src1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete by 28bytes (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 14:05, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused, maybe G6 Hhkohh (talk) 11:45, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Akhil Pasreja edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, there is a draft article with the same title, so I imagine this was either a mistake or a test (not clear-cut, otherwise I'd have tagged for G2). ƒirefly ( t · c · who? ) 10:29, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Non-admin Adminstats edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Of the accounts to whom these pages relate, only Bearian, Nixeagle, and Indubitably have ever held the userrights necessary to populate adminstats, other than a handful who had the rights but are now sitebanned and one which is an admin's alt which was only given the rights as a test. None currently hold those userrights. And of those three, only Bearian has been in any way meaningfully active in about the last five years. Therefore I am speedy deleting all of these pages under criterion G6 per the previous discussion, except for Template:Adminstats/Bearian on which I am deferring to Bearian's wishes (@Bearian: please tag the page with {{db-user}} or some equivalent if you wish to delete it, otherwise just disregard this whole thing.) Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 11:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused, maybe G6 Hhkohh (talk) 07:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_June_18&oldid=849349950"