Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 January 9

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 8 January 10 >

January 9 edit

Template:Campaignbox Peasants' revolt in Palestine edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Moved. (non-admin closure) Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 02:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:TFD#REASONS. The template has only valid 4 articles, is about an occurrence that already has a category of its own, and has multiple in-links at the main Peasants' revolt in Palestine article. Shalom11111 (talk) 08:59, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:43, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2016–17 Euroleague Regular season results edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged BladesGodric 16:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused and out-of-date; results are already in 2016–17 EuroLeague Regular Season Frietjes (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2017−18 Liga MX Aggregate table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 21. (non-admin closure) Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 02:28, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nimian States edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 21:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nikita ratings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

not used in Nikita or related articles Frietjes (talk) 21:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nigerien presidential election, 2004 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

duplicates the results table in the article Frietjes (talk) 21:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nicola Tribal Association edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by a subgroup of Template:Nlaka'pamux governments Frietjes (talk) 20:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ngayarta edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 20:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • A nice idea, but not something we're bothering with for other language families. Though if I were still active here, I'd be tempted to start! — kwami (talk) 21:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:New York gubernatorial election, 2014 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

duplicates the table in the article Frietjes (talk) 20:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:New York State Historic Sites edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 17. (non-admin closure) Winged BladesGodric 16:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:New Jersey Counties Labeled Map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused, articles are using Template:Counties of New Jersey image map instead Frietjes (talk) 20:53, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Netscapeversions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by navigation in Template:Netscape Frietjes (talk) 20:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unless this is for some purpose the navbox won't serve. (Not that I can think of a good one.) —PC-XT+ 06:51, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nevada/color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 20:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Neoplasms edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:24, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 20:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as above. Easily replaced by a category.--Tom (LT) (talk) 04:56, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - transcludes too many templates to be useful. PriceDL (talk) 05:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No need transclude so many templates! Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:17, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Neighbourhoods of Güzelyurt edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused, all red links Frietjes (talk) 20:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Navseasoncats2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 20:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox UK school edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 17. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Men's rights article probation (portions) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged BladesGodric 16:46, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

per the rationale provided by Noyster and Jc86035 in the Community article probation discussion. Frietjes (talk) 15:10, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; discretionary sanctions apply to Men's rights activism so the template is no longer useful. The category should be CSDable after the deletion of the template without putting it at CfD, though I don't think it belongs at TfD. Jc86035 (talk) 15:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • See here.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, superseded by DS. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The template is used to notify users that discretionary sanctions are in place. As such it's very useful. Some people here are arguing that the discretionary sanctions are enough by themselves, but notification is usually required before harsher actions are taken against disruptive users, and this template is part of the system of notification. Binksternet (talk) 16:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete as largely redundant to {{ds/talk notice}} though if there is another use or if this specialized template is easier for editors in general to understand, I suppose I'd look into options like wrapping... —PC-XT+ 01:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Knowledge Fund edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged BladesGodric 16:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other than 2 links there is no apparent purpose for this template. – S. Rich (talk) 07:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, the articles can be connected through standard in-article and see-also linking. Frietjes (talk) 13:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as basically an overstyled link, redundant to a simple link —PC-XT+ 01:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WebSlice-begin edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Web Slice technology is only supported in Internet Explorer 8 and 9, so no longer a need for these templates. WOSlinker (talk) 12:13, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, not useful for the majority of our viewers/editors. Frietjes (talk) 13:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (after removal from articles); no longer useful. Jc86035 (talk) 11:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Are they still considering using this in the future? I'd say delete if not, or if it can easily be restored to the pages... —PC-XT+ 01:29, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Languages of Tamil Nadu edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 17. (non-admin closure) Winged BladesGodric 16:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_January_9&oldid=1065802617"